Esrat Zahan, Md Zakir Hossain, A. Rahman, Waheeda Nargirs
{"title":"麻黄碱在剖宫产脊柱麻醉期间低血压治疗中的作用","authors":"Esrat Zahan, Md Zakir Hossain, A. Rahman, Waheeda Nargirs","doi":"10.3329/jbsa.v31i2.66493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section remains a common scenarioin our clinical practice. Certain risk factors play a role in altering the incidence of hypotension. Ephedrinehas been the drug of choice for more than 30 years in the treatment of spinal anesthesia induced maternalhypotension. It has a good safety record, ready availability, and familiarity to most anesthesiologists.\nAims: To determine the efficacy and safety of prophylactic bolus dose of 0.5 mg/kg intravenous ephedrinefor the prevention of hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery.\nMethods: It was designed a randomized, double-blinded study. Patients were randomly allocated intotwo groups: ephedrine group (n=30) and control group (n=30). Intravenous preload of 15 mL/kg lactatedRinger’s solution was given. Shortly after the spinal injection, ephedrine0.5 mg/kg or saline was injectedintravenous for 60 sec.\nResults: The mean of highestand lowest heart rate in the ephedrine group was higher than those ofcontrol group (p<0.05). There were significant lower incidences of hypotension and nauseaand vomitingin the ephedrine group compared with the control group 11(36.7%) vs. 24(80.0%); 6(20.0%) vs. 17 (56.7%),respectively) (p<0.05). The first rescue ephedrine time in the ephedrine group was significantly longer(14.9±7.1 min vs. 7.9±5.4 min) than that of the control group (p<0.05). Neonatal outcome were similarbetween the study groups.\nConclusion: The above findings suggest, the prophylactic bolus dose of 0.5 mg/kg intravenous ephedrinegiven at the time of intrathecal block after a crystalloidfluid preload, plus rescue boluses reduce theincidence of hypotension.\nJBSA 2018; 31(2): 88-94","PeriodicalId":17242,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Bangladesh Society of Anaesthesiologists","volume":"213 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role of Ephedrine for Management of Hypotension During Spinal Anaesthesia for Caesarean Delivery\",\"authors\":\"Esrat Zahan, Md Zakir Hossain, A. Rahman, Waheeda Nargirs\",\"doi\":\"10.3329/jbsa.v31i2.66493\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section remains a common scenarioin our clinical practice. Certain risk factors play a role in altering the incidence of hypotension. Ephedrinehas been the drug of choice for more than 30 years in the treatment of spinal anesthesia induced maternalhypotension. It has a good safety record, ready availability, and familiarity to most anesthesiologists.\\nAims: To determine the efficacy and safety of prophylactic bolus dose of 0.5 mg/kg intravenous ephedrinefor the prevention of hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery.\\nMethods: It was designed a randomized, double-blinded study. Patients were randomly allocated intotwo groups: ephedrine group (n=30) and control group (n=30). Intravenous preload of 15 mL/kg lactatedRinger’s solution was given. Shortly after the spinal injection, ephedrine0.5 mg/kg or saline was injectedintravenous for 60 sec.\\nResults: The mean of highestand lowest heart rate in the ephedrine group was higher than those ofcontrol group (p<0.05). There were significant lower incidences of hypotension and nauseaand vomitingin the ephedrine group compared with the control group 11(36.7%) vs. 24(80.0%); 6(20.0%) vs. 17 (56.7%),respectively) (p<0.05). The first rescue ephedrine time in the ephedrine group was significantly longer(14.9±7.1 min vs. 7.9±5.4 min) than that of the control group (p<0.05). Neonatal outcome were similarbetween the study groups.\\nConclusion: The above findings suggest, the prophylactic bolus dose of 0.5 mg/kg intravenous ephedrinegiven at the time of intrathecal block after a crystalloidfluid preload, plus rescue boluses reduce theincidence of hypotension.\\nJBSA 2018; 31(2): 88-94\",\"PeriodicalId\":17242,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Bangladesh Society of Anaesthesiologists\",\"volume\":\"213 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Bangladesh Society of Anaesthesiologists\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3329/jbsa.v31i2.66493\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Bangladesh Society of Anaesthesiologists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/jbsa.v31i2.66493","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Role of Ephedrine for Management of Hypotension During Spinal Anaesthesia for Caesarean Delivery
Background: Hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section remains a common scenarioin our clinical practice. Certain risk factors play a role in altering the incidence of hypotension. Ephedrinehas been the drug of choice for more than 30 years in the treatment of spinal anesthesia induced maternalhypotension. It has a good safety record, ready availability, and familiarity to most anesthesiologists.
Aims: To determine the efficacy and safety of prophylactic bolus dose of 0.5 mg/kg intravenous ephedrinefor the prevention of hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery.
Methods: It was designed a randomized, double-blinded study. Patients were randomly allocated intotwo groups: ephedrine group (n=30) and control group (n=30). Intravenous preload of 15 mL/kg lactatedRinger’s solution was given. Shortly after the spinal injection, ephedrine0.5 mg/kg or saline was injectedintravenous for 60 sec.
Results: The mean of highestand lowest heart rate in the ephedrine group was higher than those ofcontrol group (p<0.05). There were significant lower incidences of hypotension and nauseaand vomitingin the ephedrine group compared with the control group 11(36.7%) vs. 24(80.0%); 6(20.0%) vs. 17 (56.7%),respectively) (p<0.05). The first rescue ephedrine time in the ephedrine group was significantly longer(14.9±7.1 min vs. 7.9±5.4 min) than that of the control group (p<0.05). Neonatal outcome were similarbetween the study groups.
Conclusion: The above findings suggest, the prophylactic bolus dose of 0.5 mg/kg intravenous ephedrinegiven at the time of intrathecal block after a crystalloidfluid preload, plus rescue boluses reduce theincidence of hypotension.
JBSA 2018; 31(2): 88-94