收入还是财富:2020年刺激计划对人们的幸福意味着什么?为什么它很重要?

Challenge (Atlanta, Ga.) Pub Date : 2021-05-04 DOI:10.1080/05775132.2021.1932138

Michael Madowitz, C. Weller

{"title":"收入还是财富:2020年刺激计划对人们的幸福意味着什么?为什么它很重要?","authors":"Michael Madowitz, C. Weller","doi":"10.1080/05775132.2021.1932138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The consensus view is that the economy benefits most when Americans spend their stimulus checks on goods and services. But what if they saved the money, as many did? These authors argue that the benefits to mental health due to a financial cushion can also lead to a stronger economy. Mental health is, arguably, a new Keynesian variable","PeriodicalId":88850,"journal":{"name":"Challenge (Atlanta, Ga.)","volume":"113 1","pages":"229 - 242"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Income or Wealth: What Did the 2020 Stimulus Mean for People’s Happiness and Why It Matters?\",\"authors\":\"Michael Madowitz, C. Weller\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/05775132.2021.1932138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The consensus view is that the economy benefits most when Americans spend their stimulus checks on goods and services. But what if they saved the money, as many did? These authors argue that the benefits to mental health due to a financial cushion can also lead to a stronger economy. Mental health is, arguably, a new Keynesian variable\",\"PeriodicalId\":88850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Challenge (Atlanta, Ga.)\",\"volume\":\"113 1\",\"pages\":\"229 - 242\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Challenge (Atlanta, Ga.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/05775132.2021.1932138\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Challenge (Atlanta, Ga.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/05775132.2021.1932138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

人们普遍认为，当美国人将刺激资金用于购买商品和服务时，经济受益最大。但如果他们像许多人那样把钱存起来呢?这些作者认为，财政缓冲对心理健康的好处也可以带来更强劲的经济。可以说，心理健康是一个新的凯恩斯变量

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Income or Wealth: What Did the 2020 Stimulus Mean for People’s Happiness and Why It Matters?

Abstract The consensus view is that the economy benefits most when Americans spend their stimulus checks on goods and services. But what if they saved the money, as many did? These authors argue that the benefits to mental health due to a financial cushion can also lead to a stronger economy. Mental health is, arguably, a new Keynesian variable

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Challenge (Atlanta, Ga.)

自引率

0.00%

发文量