博尔赫斯论可能的世界

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Nahum Brown
{"title":"博尔赫斯论可能的世界","authors":"Nahum Brown","doi":"10.1353/mos.2020.0026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This essay analyzes the philosophical import of Jorge Luis Borges's story \"The Garden of Forking Paths.\" Borges's story contains rich insights into the nature of possible worlds, contradiction, and infinity. In contrast to Leibniz, who claims that non-contradiction separates infinite possible worlds, Borges's vision of modal reality does not adhere to non-contradiction.","PeriodicalId":44769,"journal":{"name":"Mosaic-An Interdisciplinary Critical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Borges on Possible Worlds\",\"authors\":\"Nahum Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/mos.2020.0026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This essay analyzes the philosophical import of Jorge Luis Borges's story \\\"The Garden of Forking Paths.\\\" Borges's story contains rich insights into the nature of possible worlds, contradiction, and infinity. In contrast to Leibniz, who claims that non-contradiction separates infinite possible worlds, Borges's vision of modal reality does not adhere to non-contradiction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44769,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mosaic-An Interdisciplinary Critical Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mosaic-An Interdisciplinary Critical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/mos.2020.0026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mosaic-An Interdisciplinary Critical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/mos.2020.0026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文分析了博尔赫斯小说《分路花园》的哲学意义。博尔赫斯的故事包含了对可能世界、矛盾和无限本质的丰富见解。与莱布尼茨声称非矛盾性分离了无限可能世界的观点相反,博尔赫斯对模态现实的看法并不坚持非矛盾性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Borges on Possible Worlds
Abstract:This essay analyzes the philosophical import of Jorge Luis Borges's story "The Garden of Forking Paths." Borges's story contains rich insights into the nature of possible worlds, contradiction, and infinity. In contrast to Leibniz, who claims that non-contradiction separates infinite possible worlds, Borges's vision of modal reality does not adhere to non-contradiction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信