{"title":"加蓬式员工横向和纵向个人主义和集体主义量表的心理测量特征","authors":"Nadie Judicaëlle Pambo, D. Truchot, D. Ansel","doi":"10.1080/17542863.2017.1389965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism (HV-IC) scale is one of the most used to assess individualism and collectivism (IC), but its factorial structure is more discussed. In the context of this debate, this paper presents two studies that establish the psychometric properties of a French version of the HV-IC scale among Gabonese employees. In study 1, a principal component factor analyses (N = 344) conducted with statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS) software indicated that the four-factor replicated well with fewer items than the initial version (reduced from 32 to 21 items). In study 2, a confirmatory factor analyses (N = 293) using Amos software provided satisfactory goodness of fit after minor modifications in the covariances between errors: X² (181) = 305.30, p = .000; goodness of fit index (GFI) = .91; comparative fit index (CFI) = .90; and root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = .05 (confidence interval [.04, .06]). The findings indicated that the Gabonese version of the HV-IC scale is a valid, reliable measure with a solid theoretical base. This study offers African French researchers a valid measurement tool and, consequently, a new methodological approach with which to build a better understanding of the cultural orientation of employees at work. Our results contribute to the debate about the cross-cultural validation of the scale.","PeriodicalId":38926,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Culture and Mental Health","volume":"27 1","pages":"351 - 361"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric properties of the Gabonese version of the horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism scale among employees\",\"authors\":\"Nadie Judicaëlle Pambo, D. Truchot, D. Ansel\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17542863.2017.1389965\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism (HV-IC) scale is one of the most used to assess individualism and collectivism (IC), but its factorial structure is more discussed. In the context of this debate, this paper presents two studies that establish the psychometric properties of a French version of the HV-IC scale among Gabonese employees. In study 1, a principal component factor analyses (N = 344) conducted with statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS) software indicated that the four-factor replicated well with fewer items than the initial version (reduced from 32 to 21 items). In study 2, a confirmatory factor analyses (N = 293) using Amos software provided satisfactory goodness of fit after minor modifications in the covariances between errors: X² (181) = 305.30, p = .000; goodness of fit index (GFI) = .91; comparative fit index (CFI) = .90; and root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = .05 (confidence interval [.04, .06]). The findings indicated that the Gabonese version of the HV-IC scale is a valid, reliable measure with a solid theoretical base. This study offers African French researchers a valid measurement tool and, consequently, a new methodological approach with which to build a better understanding of the cultural orientation of employees at work. Our results contribute to the debate about the cross-cultural validation of the scale.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Culture and Mental Health\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"351 - 361\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Culture and Mental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17542863.2017.1389965\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Culture and Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17542863.2017.1389965","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Psychometric properties of the Gabonese version of the horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism scale among employees
ABSTRACT The horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism (HV-IC) scale is one of the most used to assess individualism and collectivism (IC), but its factorial structure is more discussed. In the context of this debate, this paper presents two studies that establish the psychometric properties of a French version of the HV-IC scale among Gabonese employees. In study 1, a principal component factor analyses (N = 344) conducted with statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS) software indicated that the four-factor replicated well with fewer items than the initial version (reduced from 32 to 21 items). In study 2, a confirmatory factor analyses (N = 293) using Amos software provided satisfactory goodness of fit after minor modifications in the covariances between errors: X² (181) = 305.30, p = .000; goodness of fit index (GFI) = .91; comparative fit index (CFI) = .90; and root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = .05 (confidence interval [.04, .06]). The findings indicated that the Gabonese version of the HV-IC scale is a valid, reliable measure with a solid theoretical base. This study offers African French researchers a valid measurement tool and, consequently, a new methodological approach with which to build a better understanding of the cultural orientation of employees at work. Our results contribute to the debate about the cross-cultural validation of the scale.
期刊介绍:
This title has ceased (2018). This important peer-review journal provides an innovative forum, both international and multidisciplinary, for addressing cross-cultural issues and mental health. Culture as it comes to bear on mental health is a rapidly expanding area of inquiry and research within psychiatry and psychology, and other related fields such as social work, with important implications for practice in the global context. The journal is an essential resource for health care professionals working in the field of cross-cultural mental health.Readership includes psychiatrists, psychologists, medical anthropologists, medical sociologists, psychiatric nurses and social workers, general practitioners and other mental health professionals interested in the area. The International Journal of Culture and Mental Health publishes original empirical research, review papers and theoretical articles in the fields of cross-cultural psychiatry and psychology. Contributions from the fields of medical anthropology and medical sociology are particularly welcome. A continuing dialogue between members of various disciplines in various fields is encouraged. The aim of the journal is to encourage its readers to think about various issues which have clouded cross-cultural development of ideas. The journal lays special emphasis on developing further links between medical anthropology, medical sociology, clinical psychiatry and psychology, and implications of the findings on service provisions. The journal is published four times a year. The style of reference is Harvard. All research articles in this journal, including those in special issues, special sections or supplements, have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymized refereeing by at least two independent referees.