临床试验设计的上置信限策略

IF 0.6 Q4 STATISTICS & PROBABILITY
A. Dzhoha, I. Rozora
{"title":"临床试验设计的上置信限策略","authors":"A. Dzhoha, I. Rozora","doi":"10.17713/ajs.v52isi.1751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The multi-armed bandit problem is a classic example of the exploration-exploitation trade-off well suited to model sequential resource allocation under uncertainty. One of its typical motivating applications is the adaptive designs in clinical trials which modify the trial's course in accordance with the pre-specified objective by utilizing results accumulating in the trial. Since the response to a procedure in clinical trials is not immediate, the multi-armed bandit policies require adaptation to delays to retain their theoretical guarantees. In this work, we show the importance of such adaptation by evaluating policies using the publicly available datasetThe International Stroke Trial of a randomized trial of aspirin and subcutaneous heparin among 19,435 patients with acute ischaemic stroke. In addition to adapted policies, we analyze the Upper Confidence Bound policy with the beta feedback to mitigate delays when the certainty evidence of successful treatment is available in a relatively short-term period after the procedure.","PeriodicalId":51761,"journal":{"name":"Austrian Journal of Statistics","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beta Upper Confidence Bound Policy for the Design of Clinical Trials\",\"authors\":\"A. Dzhoha, I. Rozora\",\"doi\":\"10.17713/ajs.v52isi.1751\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The multi-armed bandit problem is a classic example of the exploration-exploitation trade-off well suited to model sequential resource allocation under uncertainty. One of its typical motivating applications is the adaptive designs in clinical trials which modify the trial's course in accordance with the pre-specified objective by utilizing results accumulating in the trial. Since the response to a procedure in clinical trials is not immediate, the multi-armed bandit policies require adaptation to delays to retain their theoretical guarantees. In this work, we show the importance of such adaptation by evaluating policies using the publicly available datasetThe International Stroke Trial of a randomized trial of aspirin and subcutaneous heparin among 19,435 patients with acute ischaemic stroke. In addition to adapted policies, we analyze the Upper Confidence Bound policy with the beta feedback to mitigate delays when the certainty evidence of successful treatment is available in a relatively short-term period after the procedure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51761,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Austrian Journal of Statistics\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Austrian Journal of Statistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17713/ajs.v52isi.1751\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Austrian Journal of Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17713/ajs.v52isi.1751","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多臂土匪问题是一个典型的勘探-开采权衡问题,适合于不确定条件下的时序资源分配模型。其典型的激励应用之一是临床试验中的适应性设计,即利用试验中积累的结果,根据预先规定的目标修改试验过程。由于对临床试验程序的反应不是立即的,因此多武装强盗政策需要适应延迟以保留其理论上的保证。在这项工作中,我们通过使用公开可用的数据评估政策来显示这种适应的重要性。国际卒中试验在19435名急性缺血性卒中患者中进行了阿司匹林和皮下肝素的随机试验。除了适应策略外,我们还使用beta反馈分析了上限置信度策略,以减轻在手术后相对较短的时间内获得成功治疗的确定性证据时的延迟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beta Upper Confidence Bound Policy for the Design of Clinical Trials
The multi-armed bandit problem is a classic example of the exploration-exploitation trade-off well suited to model sequential resource allocation under uncertainty. One of its typical motivating applications is the adaptive designs in clinical trials which modify the trial's course in accordance with the pre-specified objective by utilizing results accumulating in the trial. Since the response to a procedure in clinical trials is not immediate, the multi-armed bandit policies require adaptation to delays to retain their theoretical guarantees. In this work, we show the importance of such adaptation by evaluating policies using the publicly available datasetThe International Stroke Trial of a randomized trial of aspirin and subcutaneous heparin among 19,435 patients with acute ischaemic stroke. In addition to adapted policies, we analyze the Upper Confidence Bound policy with the beta feedback to mitigate delays when the certainty evidence of successful treatment is available in a relatively short-term period after the procedure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Austrian Journal of Statistics
Austrian Journal of Statistics STATISTICS & PROBABILITY-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Austrian Journal of Statistics is an open-access journal (without any fees) with a long history and is published approximately quarterly by the Austrian Statistical Society. Its general objective is to promote and extend the use of statistical methods in all kind of theoretical and applied disciplines. The Austrian Journal of Statistics is indexed in many data bases, such as Scopus (by Elsevier), Web of Science - ESCI by Clarivate Analytics (formely Thompson & Reuters), DOAJ, Scimago, and many more. The current estimated impact factor (via Publish or Perish) is 0.775, see HERE, or even more indices HERE. Austrian Journal of Statistics ISNN number is 1026597X Original papers and review articles in English will be published in the Austrian Journal of Statistics if judged consistently with these general aims. All papers will be refereed. Special topics sections will appear from time to time. Each section will have as a theme a specialized area of statistical application, theory, or methodology. Technical notes or problems for considerations under Shorter Communications are also invited. A special section is reserved for book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信