预防肿瘤患者发热性中性粒细胞减少:真实世界的数据

Q4 Medicine
K. V. Sapozhnikov, Irina V. Sorokina, A. Gusev, N. Sableva, Valeriia D. Sokolova, D. Tolkacheva, A. Berezina
{"title":"预防肿瘤患者发热性中性粒细胞减少:真实世界的数据","authors":"K. V. Sapozhnikov, Irina V. Sorokina, A. Gusev, N. Sableva, Valeriia D. Sokolova, D. Tolkacheva, A. Berezina","doi":"10.26442/18151434.2023.1.202138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim. To assess the effect of febrile neutropenia (FN) prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF) in real-world cancer patients. \nMaterials and methods. We conducted a statistical analysis of anonymized medical records collected in the Webiomed platform. Before analysis, the cards were validated by clinical experts. Electronic records were extracted according to two principles: mentioning D70 in the diagnosis or mentioning a chemotherapy regimen associated with a high risk of FN (20%), requiring the primary prevention of neutropenia. Thus, we obtained two datasets comprising 47.085 (590 patients) and 30.523 (398 patients) records, respectively. \nResults. Based on the analysis results, the most common risk factors for FN development were highly hematologically toxic chemotherapy regimens and elderly age about 50% in the adult population. In both datasets, the number of female patients prevailed (63.7% in dataset 1, 91.2% in dataset 2), so the most common was breast cancer. Less common were cervical cancer, digestive cancer, and lung cancer. Despite the indications for primary prevention of FN, for safety and importance of achieving the planned dose intensity, it was administered in 18.3% of patients in dataset 1 and 2.3% in dataset 2. No FN or G-CSF-related adverse events were reported in patients who received adequate primary prevention. \nConclusion. Some issues related to G-CSF administration in cancer patients were identified. We identified the insufficient provision of patients with primary prevention of FN, which negatively affects survival rates and reduces adherence to antitumor therapy. Real-world data demonstrate the efficacy and safety of FN prevention and planned dose intensity maintance in cytotoxic therapy regimens.","PeriodicalId":16401,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Modern Oncology","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevention of febrile neutropenia in oncological patients: real-world data\",\"authors\":\"K. V. Sapozhnikov, Irina V. Sorokina, A. Gusev, N. Sableva, Valeriia D. Sokolova, D. Tolkacheva, A. Berezina\",\"doi\":\"10.26442/18151434.2023.1.202138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim. To assess the effect of febrile neutropenia (FN) prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF) in real-world cancer patients. \\nMaterials and methods. We conducted a statistical analysis of anonymized medical records collected in the Webiomed platform. Before analysis, the cards were validated by clinical experts. Electronic records were extracted according to two principles: mentioning D70 in the diagnosis or mentioning a chemotherapy regimen associated with a high risk of FN (20%), requiring the primary prevention of neutropenia. Thus, we obtained two datasets comprising 47.085 (590 patients) and 30.523 (398 patients) records, respectively. \\nResults. Based on the analysis results, the most common risk factors for FN development were highly hematologically toxic chemotherapy regimens and elderly age about 50% in the adult population. In both datasets, the number of female patients prevailed (63.7% in dataset 1, 91.2% in dataset 2), so the most common was breast cancer. Less common were cervical cancer, digestive cancer, and lung cancer. Despite the indications for primary prevention of FN, for safety and importance of achieving the planned dose intensity, it was administered in 18.3% of patients in dataset 1 and 2.3% in dataset 2. No FN or G-CSF-related adverse events were reported in patients who received adequate primary prevention. \\nConclusion. Some issues related to G-CSF administration in cancer patients were identified. We identified the insufficient provision of patients with primary prevention of FN, which negatively affects survival rates and reduces adherence to antitumor therapy. Real-world data demonstrate the efficacy and safety of FN prevention and planned dose intensity maintance in cytotoxic therapy regimens.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Modern Oncology\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Modern Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26442/18151434.2023.1.202138\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Modern Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26442/18151434.2023.1.202138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

的目标。评估粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)在现实世界癌症患者中预防发热性中性粒细胞减少症(FN)的效果。材料和方法。我们对在Webiomed平台上收集的匿名病历进行了统计分析。在分析之前,这些卡片由临床专家进行验证。电子病历的提取依据两个原则:在诊断中提及D70或提及与FN高风险相关的化疗方案(20%),需要对中性粒细胞减少症进行一级预防。因此,我们获得了两个数据集,分别包含47.085(590例)和30.523(398例)条记录。结果。根据分析结果,FN发生最常见的危险因素是高血液学毒性的化疗方案和成年人群中约50%的老年人。在这两个数据集中,女性患者占多数(数据集1为63.7%,数据集2为91.2%),因此最常见的是乳腺癌。不太常见的是宫颈癌、消化道癌和肺癌。尽管FN有一级预防适应症,但考虑到安全性和实现计划剂量强度的重要性,数据集1中18.3%的患者和数据集2中2.3%的患者使用了该药物。在接受充分一级预防的患者中,未报告FN或g - csf相关不良事件。结论。确定了与癌症患者G-CSF给药有关的一些问题。我们发现对FN初级预防的患者提供不足,这对生存率产生负面影响,并降低了抗肿瘤治疗的依从性。实际数据证明了细胞毒性治疗方案中FN预防和计划剂量强度维持的有效性和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prevention of febrile neutropenia in oncological patients: real-world data
Aim. To assess the effect of febrile neutropenia (FN) prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF) in real-world cancer patients. Materials and methods. We conducted a statistical analysis of anonymized medical records collected in the Webiomed platform. Before analysis, the cards were validated by clinical experts. Electronic records were extracted according to two principles: mentioning D70 in the diagnosis or mentioning a chemotherapy regimen associated with a high risk of FN (20%), requiring the primary prevention of neutropenia. Thus, we obtained two datasets comprising 47.085 (590 patients) and 30.523 (398 patients) records, respectively. Results. Based on the analysis results, the most common risk factors for FN development were highly hematologically toxic chemotherapy regimens and elderly age about 50% in the adult population. In both datasets, the number of female patients prevailed (63.7% in dataset 1, 91.2% in dataset 2), so the most common was breast cancer. Less common were cervical cancer, digestive cancer, and lung cancer. Despite the indications for primary prevention of FN, for safety and importance of achieving the planned dose intensity, it was administered in 18.3% of patients in dataset 1 and 2.3% in dataset 2. No FN or G-CSF-related adverse events were reported in patients who received adequate primary prevention. Conclusion. Some issues related to G-CSF administration in cancer patients were identified. We identified the insufficient provision of patients with primary prevention of FN, which negatively affects survival rates and reduces adherence to antitumor therapy. Real-world data demonstrate the efficacy and safety of FN prevention and planned dose intensity maintance in cytotoxic therapy regimens.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Modern Oncology
Journal of Modern Oncology Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信