职业压力调查中的概念和方法问题。在洛克比空难现场负责尸体打捞工作的警察案例研究

IF 2 2区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Mike Walker
{"title":"职业压力调查中的概念和方法问题。在洛克比空难现场负责尸体打捞工作的警察案例研究","authors":"Mike Walker","doi":"10.1080/10439463.1997.9964761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents data from a case study of the 25 police officers comprising the Victim Recovery and Identification Team (VRIT) of the Metropolitan Police Service who were deployed at the site of the Lockerbie air crash in 1988. The purpose in presenting this case study is to review some of the conceptual and methodological issues identified in recent literature on stress amongst police officers. It looks at the distinction between stress and post‐traumatic stress and finds the distinction blurred. It considers the problems associated with gaining access to personally and professionally sensitive issues within the cultural context of police work and concludes that qualitative methods of research add an important dimension which is often missed by survey techniques. The implications are that we are more likely to under‐estimate rather than over‐estimate the incidence of stress amongst police officers.","PeriodicalId":47763,"journal":{"name":"Policing & Society","volume":"110 1","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conceptual and methodological issues in the investigation of occupational stress. A case study of police officers deployed on body recovery at the site of the Lockerbie air crash\",\"authors\":\"Mike Walker\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10439463.1997.9964761\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents data from a case study of the 25 police officers comprising the Victim Recovery and Identification Team (VRIT) of the Metropolitan Police Service who were deployed at the site of the Lockerbie air crash in 1988. The purpose in presenting this case study is to review some of the conceptual and methodological issues identified in recent literature on stress amongst police officers. It looks at the distinction between stress and post‐traumatic stress and finds the distinction blurred. It considers the problems associated with gaining access to personally and professionally sensitive issues within the cultural context of police work and concludes that qualitative methods of research add an important dimension which is often missed by survey techniques. The implications are that we are more likely to under‐estimate rather than over‐estimate the incidence of stress amongst police officers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Policing & Society\",\"volume\":\"110 1\",\"pages\":\"1-17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Policing & Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.1997.9964761\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policing & Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.1997.9964761","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

摘要

本文提供的数据来自对1988年部署在洛克比空难现场的伦敦警察厅受害者复原和鉴定队的25名警察的个案研究。在提出这个案例研究的目的是审查一些概念和方法上的问题,在最近的文献中确定的压力警察。它着眼于压力和创伤后压力之间的区别,并发现这种区别是模糊的。它考虑了在警察工作的文化背景下与获得个人和专业敏感问题有关的问题,并得出结论认为定性研究方法增加了调查技术经常错过的重要方面。这意味着我们更有可能低估而不是高估警察的压力发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Conceptual and methodological issues in the investigation of occupational stress. A case study of police officers deployed on body recovery at the site of the Lockerbie air crash
This paper presents data from a case study of the 25 police officers comprising the Victim Recovery and Identification Team (VRIT) of the Metropolitan Police Service who were deployed at the site of the Lockerbie air crash in 1988. The purpose in presenting this case study is to review some of the conceptual and methodological issues identified in recent literature on stress amongst police officers. It looks at the distinction between stress and post‐traumatic stress and finds the distinction blurred. It considers the problems associated with gaining access to personally and professionally sensitive issues within the cultural context of police work and concludes that qualitative methods of research add an important dimension which is often missed by survey techniques. The implications are that we are more likely to under‐estimate rather than over‐estimate the incidence of stress amongst police officers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Policing & Society
Policing & Society CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: Policing & Society is widely acknowledged as the leading international academic journal specialising in the study of policing institutions and their practices. It is concerned with all aspects of how policing articulates and animates the social contexts in which it is located. This includes: • Social scientific investigations of police policy and activity • Legal and political analyses of police powers and governance • Management oriented research on aspects of police organisation Space is also devoted to the relationship between what the police do and the policing decisions and functions of communities, private sector organisations and other state agencies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信