M. Sleed, Elizabeth Li, Isabella Vainieri, N. Midgley
{"title":"5岁以下儿童及其照顾者心理动力学干预的证据基础:系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"M. Sleed, Elizabeth Li, Isabella Vainieri, N. Midgley","doi":"10.1080/15289168.2023.2223739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Experiences in the first years of life can shape a range of outcomes throughout the lifespan. Effective early interventions have the potential to offset negative outcomes associated with early adversity. A broad range of psychodynamic interventions are available to children under five and their caregivers but there is a lack of research synthesizing the current evidence for their effectiveness. This paper presents a systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence for the effectiveness of psychodynamic interventions for children under 5 years of age and their caregivers. Following a systematic search of 10 databases and screening for eligibility, 77 papers were included in the review. Most studies reported positive outcomes on a range of parent and infant domains. The meta-analyses of controlled studies found significant effects of psychodynamic interventions compared to control conditions on parental reflective functioning, maternal depression, infant behavior, and infant attachment. No significant differences between psychodynamic and control interventions were found for parental stress, and parent-infant interactions. Very few studies were rated as good quality and further high-quality research is needed.","PeriodicalId":38107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infant, Child, and Adolescent Psychotherapy","volume":"22 1","pages":"179 - 214"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Evidence-Base for Psychodynamic Interventions with Children Under 5 Years of Age and Their Caregivers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis\",\"authors\":\"M. Sleed, Elizabeth Li, Isabella Vainieri, N. Midgley\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15289168.2023.2223739\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Experiences in the first years of life can shape a range of outcomes throughout the lifespan. Effective early interventions have the potential to offset negative outcomes associated with early adversity. A broad range of psychodynamic interventions are available to children under five and their caregivers but there is a lack of research synthesizing the current evidence for their effectiveness. This paper presents a systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence for the effectiveness of psychodynamic interventions for children under 5 years of age and their caregivers. Following a systematic search of 10 databases and screening for eligibility, 77 papers were included in the review. Most studies reported positive outcomes on a range of parent and infant domains. The meta-analyses of controlled studies found significant effects of psychodynamic interventions compared to control conditions on parental reflective functioning, maternal depression, infant behavior, and infant attachment. No significant differences between psychodynamic and control interventions were found for parental stress, and parent-infant interactions. Very few studies were rated as good quality and further high-quality research is needed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38107,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Infant, Child, and Adolescent Psychotherapy\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"179 - 214\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Infant, Child, and Adolescent Psychotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15289168.2023.2223739\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infant, Child, and Adolescent Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15289168.2023.2223739","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Evidence-Base for Psychodynamic Interventions with Children Under 5 Years of Age and Their Caregivers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
ABSTRACT Experiences in the first years of life can shape a range of outcomes throughout the lifespan. Effective early interventions have the potential to offset negative outcomes associated with early adversity. A broad range of psychodynamic interventions are available to children under five and their caregivers but there is a lack of research synthesizing the current evidence for their effectiveness. This paper presents a systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence for the effectiveness of psychodynamic interventions for children under 5 years of age and their caregivers. Following a systematic search of 10 databases and screening for eligibility, 77 papers were included in the review. Most studies reported positive outcomes on a range of parent and infant domains. The meta-analyses of controlled studies found significant effects of psychodynamic interventions compared to control conditions on parental reflective functioning, maternal depression, infant behavior, and infant attachment. No significant differences between psychodynamic and control interventions were found for parental stress, and parent-infant interactions. Very few studies were rated as good quality and further high-quality research is needed.