再论配置边界元法:二维问题的完美代码

N. Dumont
{"title":"再论配置边界元法:二维问题的完美代码","authors":"N. Dumont","doi":"10.2495/CMEM-V6-N6-965-975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper reviews the collocation boundary element method (BEM) exactly as it has been originally proposed on the basis of a weighted residuals statement that leads to Somigliana’s identity, but with two subtle conceptual improvements for a generally curved boundary: (a) the interpolation function for normal fluxes or traction forces (for potential or elasticity problems) must be redefined and (b) only Gauss-Legendre quadrature turns out to be required if the numerical integration issues are mathematically adequately stated. A simple, unified code is proposed – as presently shown for 2D problems – to arrive at arbitrarily high computational accuracy of the constituent matrices as well as of results at internal points independently from how convoluted a problem’s topology may be (but given the representation limitations of a discretization mesh). In fact, the higher the effect of a quasi-singularity may be, as for an internal point infinitely close to the boundary, the more accurate a result is achievable with just a few number of quadrature points. A collateral, but not less relevant, outcome of the proposed developments is that regularization methods, special quadrature schemes and so many methods that intend to conceptually deviate from the originally stated BEM as an attempt to offer numerical improvements are actually unnecessary (they are in most cases just misleading). Moreover, the inaccurate, albeit popular constant element is actually not simpler to deal with than high-order elements. Owing to space restrictions, most of the detailed developments as well as the hopefully very convincing numerical results deal with potential problems, although the more general problem of elasticity is adequately posed and assessed.","PeriodicalId":22520,"journal":{"name":"THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL METHODS AND EXPERIMENTAL MEASUREMENTS","volume":"157 1","pages":"965-975"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The collocation boundary element method revisited: perfect code for 2D problems\",\"authors\":\"N. Dumont\",\"doi\":\"10.2495/CMEM-V6-N6-965-975\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper reviews the collocation boundary element method (BEM) exactly as it has been originally proposed on the basis of a weighted residuals statement that leads to Somigliana’s identity, but with two subtle conceptual improvements for a generally curved boundary: (a) the interpolation function for normal fluxes or traction forces (for potential or elasticity problems) must be redefined and (b) only Gauss-Legendre quadrature turns out to be required if the numerical integration issues are mathematically adequately stated. A simple, unified code is proposed – as presently shown for 2D problems – to arrive at arbitrarily high computational accuracy of the constituent matrices as well as of results at internal points independently from how convoluted a problem’s topology may be (but given the representation limitations of a discretization mesh). In fact, the higher the effect of a quasi-singularity may be, as for an internal point infinitely close to the boundary, the more accurate a result is achievable with just a few number of quadrature points. A collateral, but not less relevant, outcome of the proposed developments is that regularization methods, special quadrature schemes and so many methods that intend to conceptually deviate from the originally stated BEM as an attempt to offer numerical improvements are actually unnecessary (they are in most cases just misleading). Moreover, the inaccurate, albeit popular constant element is actually not simpler to deal with than high-order elements. Owing to space restrictions, most of the detailed developments as well as the hopefully very convincing numerical results deal with potential problems, although the more general problem of elasticity is adequately posed and assessed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22520,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL METHODS AND EXPERIMENTAL MEASUREMENTS\",\"volume\":\"157 1\",\"pages\":\"965-975\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL METHODS AND EXPERIMENTAL MEASUREMENTS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2495/CMEM-V6-N6-965-975\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL METHODS AND EXPERIMENTAL MEASUREMENTS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2495/CMEM-V6-N6-965-975","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

本文回顾了搭配边界元法(BEM),它最初是在一个加权残差陈述的基础上提出的,导致了Somigliana的身份,但对一般弯曲的边界进行了两个微妙的概念改进:(a)法向通量或牵引力(势能或弹性问题)的插值函数必须重新定义;(b)如果数值积分问题在数学上得到充分说明,则只需要高斯-勒让德正交。一个简单的,统一的代码被提出-目前显示为二维问题-达到任意高的计算精度的组成矩阵,以及结果在内部点独立于如何复杂的问题的拓扑结构可能(但考虑到一个离散网格的表示限制)。事实上,对于无限靠近边界的内点,准奇点的效果越高,用少量的正交点就能得到越精确的结果。所提出的发展的附带但同样相关的结果是,正则化方法、特殊正交方案和许多试图在概念上偏离最初陈述的BEM以试图提供数值改进的方法实际上是不必要的(它们在大多数情况下只是误导)。此外,不准确的常量元素虽然很流行,但实际上并不比高阶元素更容易处理。由于篇幅限制,大多数详细的发展以及希望非常令人信服的数值结果都涉及潜在的问题,尽管更普遍的弹性问题得到了充分的提出和评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The collocation boundary element method revisited: perfect code for 2D problems
The paper reviews the collocation boundary element method (BEM) exactly as it has been originally proposed on the basis of a weighted residuals statement that leads to Somigliana’s identity, but with two subtle conceptual improvements for a generally curved boundary: (a) the interpolation function for normal fluxes or traction forces (for potential or elasticity problems) must be redefined and (b) only Gauss-Legendre quadrature turns out to be required if the numerical integration issues are mathematically adequately stated. A simple, unified code is proposed – as presently shown for 2D problems – to arrive at arbitrarily high computational accuracy of the constituent matrices as well as of results at internal points independently from how convoluted a problem’s topology may be (but given the representation limitations of a discretization mesh). In fact, the higher the effect of a quasi-singularity may be, as for an internal point infinitely close to the boundary, the more accurate a result is achievable with just a few number of quadrature points. A collateral, but not less relevant, outcome of the proposed developments is that regularization methods, special quadrature schemes and so many methods that intend to conceptually deviate from the originally stated BEM as an attempt to offer numerical improvements are actually unnecessary (they are in most cases just misleading). Moreover, the inaccurate, albeit popular constant element is actually not simpler to deal with than high-order elements. Owing to space restrictions, most of the detailed developments as well as the hopefully very convincing numerical results deal with potential problems, although the more general problem of elasticity is adequately posed and assessed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信