当代冲突分析的跨文化方法1:需要揭开围绕非洲冲突的神话和现实

Alex Igho Ovie-DLeone
{"title":"当代冲突分析的跨文化方法1:需要揭开围绕非洲冲突的神话和现实","authors":"Alex Igho Ovie-DLeone","doi":"10.21599/ATJIR.87780","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is a fact that conflicts are still very prevalent in almost every human social organization. Some scholars say, since they are so endemic to the unique innate aggressive characters of human beings, nothing could really be done to permanently prevent their occurrence no matter how hard we may try. There is therefore a need to devise a workable formula to mitigate both their frequencies of occurrences, as well as, intensities of their destructiveness on the societal fabric. That such phenomena occur more in some regions than in others, is also a fact vividly highlighted by the glaring unique characters of each location. At the moment, there can be no notion of a generic analytical frame applicable uniformly to all social settings across the world. Such a view portends to also generate intensely raging controversies and fissions in the academia. The contention here pertains to what could constitute the real and remote causes of these phenomena generally in these highly prone areas. This dilemma is further aggravated by the usual sentimental attachments to primary cultural values and individual predilections/stereotypes often known to have grossly tainted most existing analytical frames. At the end of the day, hope for a consensual position becomes fleeting. But this readily also invokes a burning desire in one to harness a holistic picturesque frame these existing frames. The desire here is to move research further in a new direction devoid of such strictures of cultural/individual stereotypes and predilections. However, to tackle such a chore here, this paper seeks to critically assess some of the primary hypotheses of the existing theories with a view to synthesize such a multi-culturally robust and a non-generic analytical frame. This frame I have referred to elsewhere as the ASRI model. As it were, focus of these critiques is especially made applicable to the African context. The reason is that, Africa stands out as perhaps one unique region in the world where there has been a rather high frequency of conflict outbreaks in the recent time. And since Africans are also multicultural in character, no better place than in Africa should such a critical focus be premised on.","PeriodicalId":7411,"journal":{"name":"Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations","volume":"25 1","pages":"16-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Cross-Cultural Approach to Contemporary Confict Analysis I: Need to Demystify Myths and Realities Surrounding African Conflicts\",\"authors\":\"Alex Igho Ovie-DLeone\",\"doi\":\"10.21599/ATJIR.87780\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is a fact that conflicts are still very prevalent in almost every human social organization. Some scholars say, since they are so endemic to the unique innate aggressive characters of human beings, nothing could really be done to permanently prevent their occurrence no matter how hard we may try. There is therefore a need to devise a workable formula to mitigate both their frequencies of occurrences, as well as, intensities of their destructiveness on the societal fabric. That such phenomena occur more in some regions than in others, is also a fact vividly highlighted by the glaring unique characters of each location. At the moment, there can be no notion of a generic analytical frame applicable uniformly to all social settings across the world. Such a view portends to also generate intensely raging controversies and fissions in the academia. The contention here pertains to what could constitute the real and remote causes of these phenomena generally in these highly prone areas. This dilemma is further aggravated by the usual sentimental attachments to primary cultural values and individual predilections/stereotypes often known to have grossly tainted most existing analytical frames. At the end of the day, hope for a consensual position becomes fleeting. But this readily also invokes a burning desire in one to harness a holistic picturesque frame these existing frames. The desire here is to move research further in a new direction devoid of such strictures of cultural/individual stereotypes and predilections. However, to tackle such a chore here, this paper seeks to critically assess some of the primary hypotheses of the existing theories with a view to synthesize such a multi-culturally robust and a non-generic analytical frame. This frame I have referred to elsewhere as the ASRI model. As it were, focus of these critiques is especially made applicable to the African context. The reason is that, Africa stands out as perhaps one unique region in the world where there has been a rather high frequency of conflict outbreaks in the recent time. And since Africans are also multicultural in character, no better place than in Africa should such a critical focus be premised on.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"16-31\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21599/ATJIR.87780\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21599/ATJIR.87780","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

事实上,在几乎每一个人类社会组织中,冲突仍然非常普遍。一些学者说,既然它们是人类与生俱来的独特的攻击性特征所特有的,无论我们多么努力,都无法真正永久地阻止它们的发生。因此,有必要制定一个可行的方案,以减轻其发生的频率,以及其对社会结构的破坏性的强度。这种现象在某些地区比在其他地区发生得更多,这也是一个由每个地区鲜明的独特特征生动地突出的事实。目前,还不可能有一种通用的分析框架,可以统一适用于世界各地的所有社会环境。这种观点也预示着在学术界引发激烈的争论和分裂。这里的争论涉及到,在这些高度易发地区,什么可能构成这些现象的真实和遥远的原因。通常对主要文化价值和个人偏好/刻板印象的情感依恋,通常被认为严重污染了大多数现有的分析框架,使这种困境进一步恶化。在一天结束的时候,达成共识的希望变得转瞬即逝。但这也很容易唤起一种强烈的欲望,即利用现有的框架来驾驭一个整体的风景如画的框架。这里的愿望是将研究进一步推向一个新的方向,没有这种文化/个人刻板印象和偏好的限制。然而,为了解决这一难题,本文试图批判性地评估现有理论的一些主要假设,以综合这样一个多文化健全和非一般的分析框架。我在其他地方把这个框架称为ASRI模型。可以说,这些批评的重点特别适用于非洲的情况。其原因是,非洲可能是世界上一个独特的区域,在那里最近爆发冲突的频率相当高。由于非洲人的性格也是多元文化的,没有比非洲更好的地方应该以这样一个关键的焦点为前提。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Cross-Cultural Approach to Contemporary Confict Analysis I: Need to Demystify Myths and Realities Surrounding African Conflicts
It is a fact that conflicts are still very prevalent in almost every human social organization. Some scholars say, since they are so endemic to the unique innate aggressive characters of human beings, nothing could really be done to permanently prevent their occurrence no matter how hard we may try. There is therefore a need to devise a workable formula to mitigate both their frequencies of occurrences, as well as, intensities of their destructiveness on the societal fabric. That such phenomena occur more in some regions than in others, is also a fact vividly highlighted by the glaring unique characters of each location. At the moment, there can be no notion of a generic analytical frame applicable uniformly to all social settings across the world. Such a view portends to also generate intensely raging controversies and fissions in the academia. The contention here pertains to what could constitute the real and remote causes of these phenomena generally in these highly prone areas. This dilemma is further aggravated by the usual sentimental attachments to primary cultural values and individual predilections/stereotypes often known to have grossly tainted most existing analytical frames. At the end of the day, hope for a consensual position becomes fleeting. But this readily also invokes a burning desire in one to harness a holistic picturesque frame these existing frames. The desire here is to move research further in a new direction devoid of such strictures of cultural/individual stereotypes and predilections. However, to tackle such a chore here, this paper seeks to critically assess some of the primary hypotheses of the existing theories with a view to synthesize such a multi-culturally robust and a non-generic analytical frame. This frame I have referred to elsewhere as the ASRI model. As it were, focus of these critiques is especially made applicable to the African context. The reason is that, Africa stands out as perhaps one unique region in the world where there has been a rather high frequency of conflict outbreaks in the recent time. And since Africans are also multicultural in character, no better place than in Africa should such a critical focus be premised on.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信