不同缝合方法对关节手术切口的影响

Haixian Lin, Shu-min Shi, Yijie Huang
{"title":"不同缝合方法对关节手术切口的影响","authors":"Haixian Lin, Shu-min Shi, Yijie Huang","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-4756.2020.04.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo investigate the effects of different suture methods on the surgical incisions of joint. \n \n \nMethods \nA total of 120 patients who underwent traumatic joint surgery in Fujian Provincial People’s Hospital from August 2016 to February 2019 were selected, and they were divided into three groups according to the incision suture method, with 40 cases in each group. Group A was sutured with ordinary silk thread, group B with titanium-nickel suture line, and group C with skin stapler. The surgical incision exudation, pain, suture firmness, and scarring were compared among the three groups. \n \n \nResults \nAll 170 patients exuded, but all the incisions healed in one stage. The number of exudates in group A, group B, and group C were 7 cases (17.5%, 7/40), 4 cases (10.0%, 4/40), and 10 cases (25.0%, 10/40) 3 to 5 days after surgery. The postoperative exudate in group B was better. Group B and group C in terms of postoperative pain had a slight ascendant than group A. The firmness of group A was better than that of group B and group C. Postoperative scar scores of group A, group B and group C were (7.1 ± 0.2), (3.7 ± 0.1), and (3.9 ± 0.2) points. The postoperative scar scores in group C and group B were less than those in group A. \n \n \nConclusions \nThe infiltration time of titanium-nickel suture incision is short, the ordinary silk suture incision is firm and reliable, and the scar of skin stapler incision is lighter. And the better appropriate material choice should be made according to the incision location mouth and the requirements of the patients. \n \n \nKey words: \nTitanium-nickel suture; Skin stapler; Ordinary silk thread","PeriodicalId":9667,"journal":{"name":"Central Plains Medical Journal","volume":"80 4 1","pages":"30-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of different suture methods on surgical incisions of joint\",\"authors\":\"Haixian Lin, Shu-min Shi, Yijie Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-4756.2020.04.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo investigate the effects of different suture methods on the surgical incisions of joint. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nA total of 120 patients who underwent traumatic joint surgery in Fujian Provincial People’s Hospital from August 2016 to February 2019 were selected, and they were divided into three groups according to the incision suture method, with 40 cases in each group. Group A was sutured with ordinary silk thread, group B with titanium-nickel suture line, and group C with skin stapler. The surgical incision exudation, pain, suture firmness, and scarring were compared among the three groups. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nAll 170 patients exuded, but all the incisions healed in one stage. The number of exudates in group A, group B, and group C were 7 cases (17.5%, 7/40), 4 cases (10.0%, 4/40), and 10 cases (25.0%, 10/40) 3 to 5 days after surgery. The postoperative exudate in group B was better. Group B and group C in terms of postoperative pain had a slight ascendant than group A. The firmness of group A was better than that of group B and group C. Postoperative scar scores of group A, group B and group C were (7.1 ± 0.2), (3.7 ± 0.1), and (3.9 ± 0.2) points. The postoperative scar scores in group C and group B were less than those in group A. \\n \\n \\nConclusions \\nThe infiltration time of titanium-nickel suture incision is short, the ordinary silk suture incision is firm and reliable, and the scar of skin stapler incision is lighter. And the better appropriate material choice should be made according to the incision location mouth and the requirements of the patients. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nTitanium-nickel suture; Skin stapler; Ordinary silk thread\",\"PeriodicalId\":9667,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Central Plains Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"80 4 1\",\"pages\":\"30-31\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Central Plains Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-4756.2020.04.009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central Plains Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-4756.2020.04.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨不同缝合方法对关节手术切口的影响。方法选取2016年8月至2019年2月福建省人民医院外伤性关节手术患者120例,按切口缝合方式分为3组,每组40例。A组采用普通丝线缝合,B组采用钛镍缝线缝合,C组采用皮钉缝合。比较三组患者手术切口渗出、疼痛、缝合牢固性、瘢痕形成情况。结果170例患者均有渗出,切口均一期愈合。术后3 ~ 5 d, A组、B组、C组有7例(17.5%,7/40),4例(10.0%,4/40),10例(25.0%,10/40)。B组术后渗出液较好。B、C组术后疼痛程度较a组略有上升,a组的硬度优于B、C组。a、B、C组术后疤痕评分分别为(7.1±0.2)分、(3.7±0.1)分、(3.9±0.2)分。结论钛镍缝合切口浸润时间短,普通丝缝合切口牢固可靠,皮肤吻合器切口瘢痕较轻。根据切口位置、切口口和患者的要求,选择合适的材料。关键词:钛镍缝合;皮肤订书机;普通丝线
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of different suture methods on surgical incisions of joint
Objective To investigate the effects of different suture methods on the surgical incisions of joint. Methods A total of 120 patients who underwent traumatic joint surgery in Fujian Provincial People’s Hospital from August 2016 to February 2019 were selected, and they were divided into three groups according to the incision suture method, with 40 cases in each group. Group A was sutured with ordinary silk thread, group B with titanium-nickel suture line, and group C with skin stapler. The surgical incision exudation, pain, suture firmness, and scarring were compared among the three groups. Results All 170 patients exuded, but all the incisions healed in one stage. The number of exudates in group A, group B, and group C were 7 cases (17.5%, 7/40), 4 cases (10.0%, 4/40), and 10 cases (25.0%, 10/40) 3 to 5 days after surgery. The postoperative exudate in group B was better. Group B and group C in terms of postoperative pain had a slight ascendant than group A. The firmness of group A was better than that of group B and group C. Postoperative scar scores of group A, group B and group C were (7.1 ± 0.2), (3.7 ± 0.1), and (3.9 ± 0.2) points. The postoperative scar scores in group C and group B were less than those in group A. Conclusions The infiltration time of titanium-nickel suture incision is short, the ordinary silk suture incision is firm and reliable, and the scar of skin stapler incision is lighter. And the better appropriate material choice should be made according to the incision location mouth and the requirements of the patients. Key words: Titanium-nickel suture; Skin stapler; Ordinary silk thread
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信