信任与未来和解:来自长期武装冲突的证据

Q2 Social Sciences
Andrés Casas-Casas, Nathalie Méndez, Juan Federico Pino Uribe
{"title":"信任与未来和解:来自长期武装冲突的证据","authors":"Andrés Casas-Casas, Nathalie Méndez, Juan Federico Pino Uribe","doi":"10.1177/1542316620945968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traditional approaches to international aid deal with post-conflict risks focusing on external safeguards for peacebuilding, leaving local social enhancers playing a subsidiary role. Trust has long been highlighted as a key factor that can positively affect sustainable peace efforts by reducing intergroup hostility. Surprisingly, most post-conflict studies deal with trust as a dependent variable. Using a cross-sectional multi-method field study in Colombia, we assess the impact of trust on prospective reconciliation in the midst of an ongoing peace process. We find that trust in ex-combatants and in government increases the likelihood of having positive attitudes towards future reconciliation and willingness to support not only the peace process but reconciliation activities after war. We offer evidence supporting the idea that rather than drawing exclusively on economic and military capabilities, investing in local governance infrastructures that promote prosocial behaviour and positive belief management in the pre-reconciliation face offers a complementary alternative to help societies exit civil wars while tackling barriers to peacebuilding efforts in the initial stages of a post-conflict.","PeriodicalId":39765,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Peacebuilding and Development","volume":"41 1","pages":"298 - 315"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trust and Prospective Reconciliation: Evidence From a Protracted Armed Conflict\",\"authors\":\"Andrés Casas-Casas, Nathalie Méndez, Juan Federico Pino Uribe\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1542316620945968\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Traditional approaches to international aid deal with post-conflict risks focusing on external safeguards for peacebuilding, leaving local social enhancers playing a subsidiary role. Trust has long been highlighted as a key factor that can positively affect sustainable peace efforts by reducing intergroup hostility. Surprisingly, most post-conflict studies deal with trust as a dependent variable. Using a cross-sectional multi-method field study in Colombia, we assess the impact of trust on prospective reconciliation in the midst of an ongoing peace process. We find that trust in ex-combatants and in government increases the likelihood of having positive attitudes towards future reconciliation and willingness to support not only the peace process but reconciliation activities after war. We offer evidence supporting the idea that rather than drawing exclusively on economic and military capabilities, investing in local governance infrastructures that promote prosocial behaviour and positive belief management in the pre-reconciliation face offers a complementary alternative to help societies exit civil wars while tackling barriers to peacebuilding efforts in the initial stages of a post-conflict.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39765,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Peacebuilding and Development\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"298 - 315\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Peacebuilding and Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1542316620945968\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Peacebuilding and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1542316620945968","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

处理冲突后风险的传统国际援助方法侧重于建设和平的外部保障,使当地社会促进者发挥辅助作用。长期以来,信任一直被强调为能够通过减少群体间敌意对可持续和平努力产生积极影响的关键因素。令人惊讶的是,大多数冲突后研究都把信任作为一个因变量来处理。通过在哥伦比亚进行的横断面多方法实地研究,我们评估了在正在进行的和平进程中信任对预期和解的影响。我们发现,对前战斗人员和政府的信任增加了对未来和解的积极态度和不仅支持和平进程而且支持战后和解活动的意愿的可能性。我们提供的证据支持这样一种观点,即投资于地方治理基础设施,促进和解前的亲社会行为和积极的信念管理,而不是仅仅依靠经济和军事能力,这是一种互补的选择,可以帮助社会摆脱内战,同时在冲突后的初始阶段解决建设和平努力的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Trust and Prospective Reconciliation: Evidence From a Protracted Armed Conflict
Traditional approaches to international aid deal with post-conflict risks focusing on external safeguards for peacebuilding, leaving local social enhancers playing a subsidiary role. Trust has long been highlighted as a key factor that can positively affect sustainable peace efforts by reducing intergroup hostility. Surprisingly, most post-conflict studies deal with trust as a dependent variable. Using a cross-sectional multi-method field study in Colombia, we assess the impact of trust on prospective reconciliation in the midst of an ongoing peace process. We find that trust in ex-combatants and in government increases the likelihood of having positive attitudes towards future reconciliation and willingness to support not only the peace process but reconciliation activities after war. We offer evidence supporting the idea that rather than drawing exclusively on economic and military capabilities, investing in local governance infrastructures that promote prosocial behaviour and positive belief management in the pre-reconciliation face offers a complementary alternative to help societies exit civil wars while tackling barriers to peacebuilding efforts in the initial stages of a post-conflict.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Peacebuilding and Development
Journal of Peacebuilding and Development Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: The Journal of Peacebuilding and Development (JPD) is a new publication for the sharing of critical thinking and constructive action at the intersections of conflict, development and peace. JPD"s authors and editorial staff represent global scholarship, practice and action aiming to develop theory-practice and North South dialogue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信