[使用视觉模拟量表评估剖宫产术后疼痛综合征的严重程度,取决于麻醉方法。]

E. Nedashkovsky, S. Sedykh, E. Zakurdaev
{"title":"[使用视觉模拟量表评估剖宫产术后疼痛综合征的严重程度,取决于麻醉方法。]","authors":"E. Nedashkovsky, S. Sedykh, E. Zakurdaev","doi":"10.18821/0201-7563-2016-61-5-372-376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"THE AIM\nTo compare efficiency of various techniques of anesthesia after Cesarean section on degree ofpain expression in randomized clinical trial.\n\n\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\n120 puerperas aged from 21 till 33 years who were undergone to Caesarean section were studied. Patients were divided into four equal groups by number of observations. In groups 1st and 2nd patients were performed local anesthesia with continuous and bolus anesthetic. In group 3rd were performed bilateral blockade of the cross-space belly. In the 4th groups was used multimodal analgesia system. Each patient during the postoperative period was estimated the severity ofpain on a visual analog scale at rest and movement at 3, 6, 12, 24 and 48 hours.\n\n\nRESULTS\nIntensity ofpain after surgery in patients of all groups decreased and reached lows of 48 hours after a Cesarean section. At the same time the 2nd group ofpatients (6,1 ? 1,4) had pain significantly less than that ofpuerperas from the 3rd and the 4th groups (13,2 J 2,4 and 18,0 ? 2,7). Meanwhile, indices offemale patients pain severity from the 1st and 2nd groups of the study were not statistically different. When studying distribution ofpatients on degree ofpostoperative pain it is established that atpuerperas of the 1st and 2nd group pains prevailed weak (47% and 67%) and moderately expressed (50% and 33%). In the 3rd group expression of a pain syndrome in all cases was moderate. In the fourth group the pain syndrome was considerably more expressed (the moderated - 53%; the strong - 4 7%).\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nPain syndrome after Cesarean section using the localanalgesia with continuous or bolus is reduced by 28-35%, which was significantly more than the blockade of the cross-space stomach and systemic analgesia.","PeriodicalId":7795,"journal":{"name":"Anesteziologiia i reanimatologiia","volume":"6 1","pages":"372-376"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[USING A VISUAL ANALOGUE SCALE FOR ASSESSING THE SEVERITY OF PAIN SYNDROME AFTER CESAREAN SECTION, DEPENDING ON THE METHOD OF ANESTHESIA.]\",\"authors\":\"E. Nedashkovsky, S. Sedykh, E. Zakurdaev\",\"doi\":\"10.18821/0201-7563-2016-61-5-372-376\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"THE AIM\\nTo compare efficiency of various techniques of anesthesia after Cesarean section on degree ofpain expression in randomized clinical trial.\\n\\n\\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\\n120 puerperas aged from 21 till 33 years who were undergone to Caesarean section were studied. Patients were divided into four equal groups by number of observations. In groups 1st and 2nd patients were performed local anesthesia with continuous and bolus anesthetic. In group 3rd were performed bilateral blockade of the cross-space belly. In the 4th groups was used multimodal analgesia system. Each patient during the postoperative period was estimated the severity ofpain on a visual analog scale at rest and movement at 3, 6, 12, 24 and 48 hours.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nIntensity ofpain after surgery in patients of all groups decreased and reached lows of 48 hours after a Cesarean section. At the same time the 2nd group ofpatients (6,1 ? 1,4) had pain significantly less than that ofpuerperas from the 3rd and the 4th groups (13,2 J 2,4 and 18,0 ? 2,7). Meanwhile, indices offemale patients pain severity from the 1st and 2nd groups of the study were not statistically different. When studying distribution ofpatients on degree ofpostoperative pain it is established that atpuerperas of the 1st and 2nd group pains prevailed weak (47% and 67%) and moderately expressed (50% and 33%). In the 3rd group expression of a pain syndrome in all cases was moderate. In the fourth group the pain syndrome was considerably more expressed (the moderated - 53%; the strong - 4 7%).\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSION\\nPain syndrome after Cesarean section using the localanalgesia with continuous or bolus is reduced by 28-35%, which was significantly more than the blockade of the cross-space stomach and systemic analgesia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anesteziologiia i reanimatologiia\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"372-376\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anesteziologiia i reanimatologiia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18821/0201-7563-2016-61-5-372-376\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesteziologiia i reanimatologiia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18821/0201-7563-2016-61-5-372-376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的通过随机临床试验,比较剖宫产术后不同麻醉方式对疼痛表达程度的影响。材料与方法对120例21 ~ 33岁剖宫产产妇进行分析。按观察次数将患者分为四组。第一组和第二组分别行局麻、连续麻和大剂量麻。第三组行双侧跨间隙腹部阻滞。第四组采用多模态镇痛系统。每位患者术后3、6、12、24和48小时静息和运动时用视觉模拟量表评估疼痛严重程度。结果各组患者术后疼痛强度均有所降低,并在剖宫产术后48小时达到最低。与此同时,第二组患者(6例,1例)1,4)疼痛明显小于第3组和第4组(13,2,2和18,0 ?2、7)。同时,第一组和第二组女性患者疼痛严重程度指标比较,差异无统计学意义。通过对患者术后疼痛程度分布的研究,发现第一组和第二组疼痛以弱痛(47%和67%)和中度痛(50%和33%)为主。第三组疼痛综合征的表达均为中度。在第四组中,疼痛综合征的表达明显增加(缓和组- 53%;强者- 4.7%)。结论剖宫产术后局部连续或小丸镇痛可减少28-35%的疼痛综合征,明显优于跨间隙胃阻滞和全身镇痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[USING A VISUAL ANALOGUE SCALE FOR ASSESSING THE SEVERITY OF PAIN SYNDROME AFTER CESAREAN SECTION, DEPENDING ON THE METHOD OF ANESTHESIA.]
THE AIM To compare efficiency of various techniques of anesthesia after Cesarean section on degree ofpain expression in randomized clinical trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS 120 puerperas aged from 21 till 33 years who were undergone to Caesarean section were studied. Patients were divided into four equal groups by number of observations. In groups 1st and 2nd patients were performed local anesthesia with continuous and bolus anesthetic. In group 3rd were performed bilateral blockade of the cross-space belly. In the 4th groups was used multimodal analgesia system. Each patient during the postoperative period was estimated the severity ofpain on a visual analog scale at rest and movement at 3, 6, 12, 24 and 48 hours. RESULTS Intensity ofpain after surgery in patients of all groups decreased and reached lows of 48 hours after a Cesarean section. At the same time the 2nd group ofpatients (6,1 ? 1,4) had pain significantly less than that ofpuerperas from the 3rd and the 4th groups (13,2 J 2,4 and 18,0 ? 2,7). Meanwhile, indices offemale patients pain severity from the 1st and 2nd groups of the study were not statistically different. When studying distribution ofpatients on degree ofpostoperative pain it is established that atpuerperas of the 1st and 2nd group pains prevailed weak (47% and 67%) and moderately expressed (50% and 33%). In the 3rd group expression of a pain syndrome in all cases was moderate. In the fourth group the pain syndrome was considerably more expressed (the moderated - 53%; the strong - 4 7%). CONCLUSION Pain syndrome after Cesarean section using the localanalgesia with continuous or bolus is reduced by 28-35%, which was significantly more than the blockade of the cross-space stomach and systemic analgesia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信