违反社会许可和规范

IF 0.5 Q4 SOCIAL WORK
Tim Dare
{"title":"违反社会许可和规范","authors":"Tim Dare","doi":"10.11157/anzswj-vol34iss1id897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It has become increasingly common to refer to ‘social licence’ or ‘the social licence to operate’.  However there is a good deal of disagreement around social licence.  This short commentary focuses on one ambiguity.  Some accounts stipluate that practice for which social licence might be given or withheld must lie outside general norms.  I argue that this cannot be an adequate definition of social licence.  It faces conceptual difficulties and would excluding many apparently uncontroversial appeals to the notion.","PeriodicalId":44524,"journal":{"name":"Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work","volume":"122 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social licence and norm violation\",\"authors\":\"Tim Dare\",\"doi\":\"10.11157/anzswj-vol34iss1id897\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It has become increasingly common to refer to ‘social licence’ or ‘the social licence to operate’.  However there is a good deal of disagreement around social licence.  This short commentary focuses on one ambiguity.  Some accounts stipluate that practice for which social licence might be given or withheld must lie outside general norms.  I argue that this cannot be an adequate definition of social licence.  It faces conceptual difficulties and would excluding many apparently uncontroversial appeals to the notion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44524,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work\",\"volume\":\"122 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol34iss1id897\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL WORK\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol34iss1id897","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“社会许可证”或“社会经营许可证”已经变得越来越普遍。然而,围绕社会许可存在大量分歧。这篇简短的评论集中在一个模棱两可的地方。有些说法规定,可能给予或扣留社会许可的做法必须在一般规范之外。我认为,这不是社会许可的恰当定义。它面临着概念上的困难,并将排除许多显然对这一概念没有争议的诉求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Social licence and norm violation
It has become increasingly common to refer to ‘social licence’ or ‘the social licence to operate’.  However there is a good deal of disagreement around social licence.  This short commentary focuses on one ambiguity.  Some accounts stipluate that practice for which social licence might be given or withheld must lie outside general norms.  I argue that this cannot be an adequate definition of social licence.  It faces conceptual difficulties and would excluding many apparently uncontroversial appeals to the notion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
28.60%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信