{"title":"写下去?","authors":"U. Enke","doi":"10.25162/medhist-2017-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Are marginal notes marginal? Backed by a book from the private library of Emil von Behring the paper reflects whether annotations are peripheral sources or whether they can give some hints concerning biographical details. Behrings traces of reading are exposed and discussed by using the example of Otto Roths Arzneimittel der heutigen Medicin (1877). The marginal notes demonstrate Behrings intensive work on hypnotics, sedativs, and analgetics which were possibly used for the therapy of others or himself. The findings will be compared to other sources of Behrings personal papers.","PeriodicalId":40892,"journal":{"name":"Medizinhistorisches Journal","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Randnotizen als Lebensspuren?\",\"authors\":\"U. Enke\",\"doi\":\"10.25162/medhist-2017-0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Are marginal notes marginal? Backed by a book from the private library of Emil von Behring the paper reflects whether annotations are peripheral sources or whether they can give some hints concerning biographical details. Behrings traces of reading are exposed and discussed by using the example of Otto Roths Arzneimittel der heutigen Medicin (1877). The marginal notes demonstrate Behrings intensive work on hypnotics, sedativs, and analgetics which were possibly used for the therapy of others or himself. The findings will be compared to other sources of Behrings personal papers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medizinhistorisches Journal\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medizinhistorisches Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25162/medhist-2017-0002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medizinhistorisches Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25162/medhist-2017-0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
旁注是旁注吗?这篇论文以埃米尔·冯·贝林私人图书馆的一本书为依据,反映了注释是外围来源,还是可以提供一些关于传记细节的提示。贝林的阅读痕迹是通过使用奥托·罗斯(Otto Roth)的Arzneimittel der heutigen Medicin(1877)的例子来暴露和讨论的。书的旁注表明,贝林在催眠药、镇静剂和镇痛药方面做了大量工作,这些药物可能用于治疗他人或他自己。这些发现将与贝林个人文件的其他来源进行比较。
Are marginal notes marginal? Backed by a book from the private library of Emil von Behring the paper reflects whether annotations are peripheral sources or whether they can give some hints concerning biographical details. Behrings traces of reading are exposed and discussed by using the example of Otto Roths Arzneimittel der heutigen Medicin (1877). The marginal notes demonstrate Behrings intensive work on hypnotics, sedativs, and analgetics which were possibly used for the therapy of others or himself. The findings will be compared to other sources of Behrings personal papers.