{"title":"寻找我们的道路:给基督教大学的教训","authors":"L. Schreiner","doi":"10.1080/15363759.2022.2043665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the midst of the ongoing challenges of a pandemic and the financial ramifications of uncertain enrollments, more and more Christian colleges and universities are making short-sighted decisions that prioritize the university’s bottom line over the well-being of students, staff, and faculty. In this volume of the journal, all four articles offer a glimpse into a different way of moving toward the future, but do so by critiquing current practice and encouraging leaders to ground their decisions in foundational elements of the Christian faith. In each article, Christian principles provide a foundation for practical suggestions to address contemporary issues. In their article “The Possible Infusion of Ubuntu and Padeia Values into Neoliberal Tendencies in Higher Education Institutions,” South African authors Johannes L. van der Walt and Izak J. Oosthuizen apply a problem-historical method to their critique of the neoliberal tendencies currently on full display in higher education, particularly in the United States. Neoliberalism is a view of the world in which economic and business principles are valued above all others and are applied indiscriminately to all aspects of life, including education. One consequence of neoliberalism is that education becomes a commodity rather than a common good; as a result, the financial viability of educational programs becomes more important than the communities served or the contribution to society. The authors note that care and compassion have been replaced by self-centered individualism, competition, achievement, and performance. Emphasizing market forces also causes social inequities to be overlooked. As a way of moving forward, they suggest keeping the best principles of neoliberalism, such as stewardship of resources, but infusing principles of ubuntu and padeia into the decisionmaking processes of higher education. The concept of ubuntu developed in sub-Saharan African communities as a guiding ethical principle for being in relationship with one another. Sometimes translated as “I am because we are,” the concept involves a belief in a universal bond that connects all humanity. The authors note that the values incorporated in ubuntu include “human dignity, humanism, empathy, respect, interactive dependency, collective responsibility, peace, friendliness, forgiveness, sharing, a sense of connectedness, altruism, understanding, respect for individual differences, knowledge of self and others, goodness, generosity, and benevolence” (p. 350). When applied to Christian higher education, the principle of ubuntu encourages a shift from individual good to communal good, from competition to collaboration, from exploitation to inclusion, and from economic capital to social capital available to all. The concept of padeia from Greek philosophy, which focuses on the education of the whole person in order to meaningfully serve their community, would lead Christian colleges and universities to not only be good stewards of their resources, but to develop their students as whole persons called to serve Christ in the world. Such institutions would be equally committed to their faculty and staff, as well as the communities they serve, prioritizing flourishing communities and people over a flourishing bottom line.","PeriodicalId":54039,"journal":{"name":"Christian Higher Education","volume":"29 1","pages":"335 - 337"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Finding Our Way: Lessons for Christian Universities\",\"authors\":\"L. Schreiner\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15363759.2022.2043665\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the midst of the ongoing challenges of a pandemic and the financial ramifications of uncertain enrollments, more and more Christian colleges and universities are making short-sighted decisions that prioritize the university’s bottom line over the well-being of students, staff, and faculty. In this volume of the journal, all four articles offer a glimpse into a different way of moving toward the future, but do so by critiquing current practice and encouraging leaders to ground their decisions in foundational elements of the Christian faith. In each article, Christian principles provide a foundation for practical suggestions to address contemporary issues. In their article “The Possible Infusion of Ubuntu and Padeia Values into Neoliberal Tendencies in Higher Education Institutions,” South African authors Johannes L. van der Walt and Izak J. Oosthuizen apply a problem-historical method to their critique of the neoliberal tendencies currently on full display in higher education, particularly in the United States. Neoliberalism is a view of the world in which economic and business principles are valued above all others and are applied indiscriminately to all aspects of life, including education. One consequence of neoliberalism is that education becomes a commodity rather than a common good; as a result, the financial viability of educational programs becomes more important than the communities served or the contribution to society. The authors note that care and compassion have been replaced by self-centered individualism, competition, achievement, and performance. Emphasizing market forces also causes social inequities to be overlooked. As a way of moving forward, they suggest keeping the best principles of neoliberalism, such as stewardship of resources, but infusing principles of ubuntu and padeia into the decisionmaking processes of higher education. The concept of ubuntu developed in sub-Saharan African communities as a guiding ethical principle for being in relationship with one another. Sometimes translated as “I am because we are,” the concept involves a belief in a universal bond that connects all humanity. The authors note that the values incorporated in ubuntu include “human dignity, humanism, empathy, respect, interactive dependency, collective responsibility, peace, friendliness, forgiveness, sharing, a sense of connectedness, altruism, understanding, respect for individual differences, knowledge of self and others, goodness, generosity, and benevolence” (p. 350). When applied to Christian higher education, the principle of ubuntu encourages a shift from individual good to communal good, from competition to collaboration, from exploitation to inclusion, and from economic capital to social capital available to all. The concept of padeia from Greek philosophy, which focuses on the education of the whole person in order to meaningfully serve their community, would lead Christian colleges and universities to not only be good stewards of their resources, but to develop their students as whole persons called to serve Christ in the world. Such institutions would be equally committed to their faculty and staff, as well as the communities they serve, prioritizing flourishing communities and people over a flourishing bottom line.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54039,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Christian Higher Education\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"335 - 337\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Christian Higher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15363759.2022.2043665\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Christian Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15363759.2022.2043665","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在疫情的持续挑战和不确定的入学人数带来的财务后果中,越来越多的基督教学院和大学做出了短视的决定,将大学的底线置于学生、教职员工的福祉之上。在这本杂志中,所有四篇文章都提供了一种通往未来的不同方式,但通过批评当前的做法并鼓励领导人在基督教信仰的基本要素中做出决定来实现这一点。在每篇文章中,基督教原则为解决当代问题提供了实际建议的基础。南非作家Johannes L. van der Walt和Izak J. Oosthuizen在他们的文章《乌班图和帕迪亚价值观可能注入高等教育机构的新自由主义倾向》中,运用了问题历史的方法来批判目前在高等教育中充分展示的新自由主义倾向,特别是在美国。新自由主义是一种世界观,在这种世界观中,经济和商业原则高于一切,并被不加区分地应用于生活的各个方面,包括教育。新自由主义的一个后果是,教育变成了一种商品,而不是一种公共利益;因此,教育项目的财务可行性变得比所服务的社区或对社会的贡献更重要。作者指出,关心和同情已经被以自我为中心的个人主义、竞争、成就和表现所取代。强调市场力量也会导致社会不平等被忽视。作为一种前进的方式,他们建议保留新自由主义的最佳原则,例如资源管理,但将ubuntu和padeia原则注入高等教育的决策过程。乌班图的概念是在撒哈拉以南非洲社区发展起来的,作为相互关系的指导道德原则。有时被翻译为“我在,因为我们在”,这个概念涉及到一种信念,即一种将全人类联系在一起的普遍纽带。作者指出,ubuntu包含的价值观包括“人类尊严、人道主义、同理心、尊重、相互依赖、集体责任、和平、友好、宽恕、分享、联系感、利他主义、理解、尊重个体差异、自我和他人的知识、善良、慷慨和仁慈”(第350页)。当应用于基督教高等教育时,乌班图原则鼓励从个人利益到公共利益的转变,从竞争到合作,从剥削到包容,从经济资本到所有人都可以使用的社会资本。来自希腊哲学的padeia的概念,注重全人的教育,以便有意义地服务于他们的社区,这将导致基督教学院和大学不仅是他们资源的好管家,而且要发展他们的学生作为一个完整的人,呼召在世界上服事基督。这样的机构将同样致力于他们的教职员工,以及他们所服务的社区,优先考虑繁荣的社区和人民,而不是繁荣的底线。
Finding Our Way: Lessons for Christian Universities
In the midst of the ongoing challenges of a pandemic and the financial ramifications of uncertain enrollments, more and more Christian colleges and universities are making short-sighted decisions that prioritize the university’s bottom line over the well-being of students, staff, and faculty. In this volume of the journal, all four articles offer a glimpse into a different way of moving toward the future, but do so by critiquing current practice and encouraging leaders to ground their decisions in foundational elements of the Christian faith. In each article, Christian principles provide a foundation for practical suggestions to address contemporary issues. In their article “The Possible Infusion of Ubuntu and Padeia Values into Neoliberal Tendencies in Higher Education Institutions,” South African authors Johannes L. van der Walt and Izak J. Oosthuizen apply a problem-historical method to their critique of the neoliberal tendencies currently on full display in higher education, particularly in the United States. Neoliberalism is a view of the world in which economic and business principles are valued above all others and are applied indiscriminately to all aspects of life, including education. One consequence of neoliberalism is that education becomes a commodity rather than a common good; as a result, the financial viability of educational programs becomes more important than the communities served or the contribution to society. The authors note that care and compassion have been replaced by self-centered individualism, competition, achievement, and performance. Emphasizing market forces also causes social inequities to be overlooked. As a way of moving forward, they suggest keeping the best principles of neoliberalism, such as stewardship of resources, but infusing principles of ubuntu and padeia into the decisionmaking processes of higher education. The concept of ubuntu developed in sub-Saharan African communities as a guiding ethical principle for being in relationship with one another. Sometimes translated as “I am because we are,” the concept involves a belief in a universal bond that connects all humanity. The authors note that the values incorporated in ubuntu include “human dignity, humanism, empathy, respect, interactive dependency, collective responsibility, peace, friendliness, forgiveness, sharing, a sense of connectedness, altruism, understanding, respect for individual differences, knowledge of self and others, goodness, generosity, and benevolence” (p. 350). When applied to Christian higher education, the principle of ubuntu encourages a shift from individual good to communal good, from competition to collaboration, from exploitation to inclusion, and from economic capital to social capital available to all. The concept of padeia from Greek philosophy, which focuses on the education of the whole person in order to meaningfully serve their community, would lead Christian colleges and universities to not only be good stewards of their resources, but to develop their students as whole persons called to serve Christ in the world. Such institutions would be equally committed to their faculty and staff, as well as the communities they serve, prioritizing flourishing communities and people over a flourishing bottom line.