罗马法令十二表法的版本

IF 0.3 4区社会学 Q2 HISTORY

Tijdschrift Voor Rechtsgeschiedenis-Revue D Histoire Du Droit-The Legal History Review Pub Date : 2017-06-22 DOI:10.1163/15718190-08512P03

B. Sirks

{"title":"罗马法令十二表法的版本","authors":"B. Sirks","doi":"10.1163/15718190-08512P03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Roman Statutes the Twelve Tables Law have undergone a considerable shift: a considerable part of the delicts (iniuria, arbores furtim caesae and furtum) has been moved from Table VIII to Table II. It is argued that this shift, which breaks with the accepted arrangement, is unwarranted. Further, some observations are made on the edition of several rules in the Twelve Tables.","PeriodicalId":43053,"journal":{"name":"Tijdschrift Voor Rechtsgeschiedenis-Revue D Histoire Du Droit-The Legal History Review","volume":"54 1","pages":"65-78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The edition of the Twelve Tables in Roman Statutes\",\"authors\":\"B. Sirks\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/15718190-08512P03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In Roman Statutes the Twelve Tables Law have undergone a considerable shift: a considerable part of the delicts (iniuria, arbores furtim caesae and furtum) has been moved from Table VIII to Table II. It is argued that this shift, which breaks with the accepted arrangement, is unwarranted. Further, some observations are made on the edition of several rules in the Twelve Tables.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43053,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tijdschrift Voor Rechtsgeschiedenis-Revue D Histoire Du Droit-The Legal History Review\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"65-78\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tijdschrift Voor Rechtsgeschiedenis-Revue D Histoire Du Droit-The Legal History Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718190-08512P03\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tijdschrift Voor Rechtsgeschiedenis-Revue D Histoire Du Droit-The Legal History Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718190-08512P03","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在罗马法规中，十二表法经历了相当大的变化:相当大一部分的不法行为(iniuria, arbores furtim caesae和furtum)已从表八移到表二。有人认为，这种违背公认安排的转变是没有根据的。此外，还对《十二表》中若干规则的修订提出了一些意见。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The edition of the Twelve Tables in Roman Statutes

In Roman Statutes the Twelve Tables Law have undergone a considerable shift: a considerable part of the delicts (iniuria, arbores furtim caesae and furtum) has been moved from Table VIII to Table II. It is argued that this shift, which breaks with the accepted arrangement, is unwarranted. Further, some observations are made on the edition of several rules in the Twelve Tables.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Tijdschrift Voor Rechtsgeschiedenis-Revue D Histoire Du Droit-The Legal History Review Multiple-

CiteScore

0.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Legal History Review, inspired by E.M. Meijers, is a peer-reviewed journal and was founded in 1918 by a number of Dutch jurists, who set out to stimulate scholarly interest in legal history in their own country and also to provide a centre for international cooperation in the subject. This has gradually through the years been achieved. The Review had already become one of the leading internationally known periodicals in the field before 1940. Since 1950 when it emerged under Belgo-Dutch editorship its position strengthened. Much attention is paid not only to the common foundations of the western legal tradition but also to the special, frequently divergent development of national law in the various countries belonging to, or influenced by it.