失业、抑郁症的症状、性别联系

Q4 Medicine
H. Burr
{"title":"失业、抑郁症的症状、性别联系","authors":"H. Burr","doi":"10.17147/asu-1-273034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Precarious work and depressive symptoms: gender-related associations Introduction: Longitudinal studies indicate that men are at greater risk than women of developing symptoms of depression as a result of precarious work. A South Korean study suggests that household position may explain this difference. The question arises as to whether these risk differences could be explained by the position in the household (i.e. living alone without a partner or living with a partner). Methods: The analysis was based on a cohort of 2,009 employees from the “Mental Health at Work Study” (S-MGA) (Rose et al. 2017). Five indicators of precarious work were used: subjective job insecurity, marginal employment, temporary employment, low wages (net hourly wage <60 % of the median) and episodes of unemployment in the past – also summarised in an index of precarious work. Possible associations between precarious work during the period 2012–2017 and depressive symptoms in 2017 were examined by logistic regression analysis – stratified by gender and position in the household (i.e. living alone without a partner or living with a partner) in 2012 and adjusted for depressive symptoms, age, occupational status and partnership status in 2012. Results: Position in the household had no significant interactions with the indicators of precarious work or an index of precarious work among either women or men. Conclusion: It is still unclear why, in many studies, the risks of developing depressive symptoms from precarious work are higher in men than in women. Keywords: precarious work – depressive symptoms – gender differences – longitudinal study","PeriodicalId":53639,"journal":{"name":"Arbeitsmedizin Sozialmedizin Umweltmedizin","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prekäre Beschäftigung und depressive Symptomatik – geschlechtsabhängige Assoziationen\",\"authors\":\"H. Burr\",\"doi\":\"10.17147/asu-1-273034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Precarious work and depressive symptoms: gender-related associations Introduction: Longitudinal studies indicate that men are at greater risk than women of developing symptoms of depression as a result of precarious work. A South Korean study suggests that household position may explain this difference. The question arises as to whether these risk differences could be explained by the position in the household (i.e. living alone without a partner or living with a partner). Methods: The analysis was based on a cohort of 2,009 employees from the “Mental Health at Work Study” (S-MGA) (Rose et al. 2017). Five indicators of precarious work were used: subjective job insecurity, marginal employment, temporary employment, low wages (net hourly wage <60 % of the median) and episodes of unemployment in the past – also summarised in an index of precarious work. Possible associations between precarious work during the period 2012–2017 and depressive symptoms in 2017 were examined by logistic regression analysis – stratified by gender and position in the household (i.e. living alone without a partner or living with a partner) in 2012 and adjusted for depressive symptoms, age, occupational status and partnership status in 2012. Results: Position in the household had no significant interactions with the indicators of precarious work or an index of precarious work among either women or men. Conclusion: It is still unclear why, in many studies, the risks of developing depressive symptoms from precarious work are higher in men than in women. Keywords: precarious work – depressive symptoms – gender differences – longitudinal study\",\"PeriodicalId\":53639,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arbeitsmedizin Sozialmedizin Umweltmedizin\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arbeitsmedizin Sozialmedizin Umweltmedizin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17147/asu-1-273034\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arbeitsmedizin Sozialmedizin Umweltmedizin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17147/asu-1-273034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

纵向研究表明,由于工作不稳定,男性比女性更容易出现抑郁症状。韩国的一项研究表明,家庭地位可以解释这种差异。问题是,这些风险差异是否可以用家庭中的地位来解释(即没有伴侣独自生活或与伴侣一起生活)。方法:分析基于来自“工作心理健康研究”(S-MGA)的2009名员工队列(Rose et al. 2017)。使用了不稳定工作的五个指标:主观工作不安全感、边际就业、临时就业、低工资(净小时工资<中位数的60%)和过去的失业事件——也总结为不稳定工作指数。通过logistic回归分析检验了2012 - 2017年期间不稳定工作与2017年抑郁症状之间可能存在的关联——根据2012年的性别和家庭地位(即没有伴侣独自生活或与伴侣共同生活)分层,并根据2012年的抑郁症状、年龄、职业状况和伴侣状况进行调整。结果:家庭中的职位与不稳定工作指标或女性或男性的不稳定工作指标没有显著的相互作用。结论:在许多研究中,男性因不稳定工作而出现抑郁症状的风险高于女性的原因尚不清楚。关键词:不稳定工作抑郁症状性别差异纵向研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prekäre Beschäftigung und depressive Symptomatik – geschlechtsabhängige Assoziationen
Precarious work and depressive symptoms: gender-related associations Introduction: Longitudinal studies indicate that men are at greater risk than women of developing symptoms of depression as a result of precarious work. A South Korean study suggests that household position may explain this difference. The question arises as to whether these risk differences could be explained by the position in the household (i.e. living alone without a partner or living with a partner). Methods: The analysis was based on a cohort of 2,009 employees from the “Mental Health at Work Study” (S-MGA) (Rose et al. 2017). Five indicators of precarious work were used: subjective job insecurity, marginal employment, temporary employment, low wages (net hourly wage <60 % of the median) and episodes of unemployment in the past – also summarised in an index of precarious work. Possible associations between precarious work during the period 2012–2017 and depressive symptoms in 2017 were examined by logistic regression analysis – stratified by gender and position in the household (i.e. living alone without a partner or living with a partner) in 2012 and adjusted for depressive symptoms, age, occupational status and partnership status in 2012. Results: Position in the household had no significant interactions with the indicators of precarious work or an index of precarious work among either women or men. Conclusion: It is still unclear why, in many studies, the risks of developing depressive symptoms from precarious work are higher in men than in women. Keywords: precarious work – depressive symptoms – gender differences – longitudinal study
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Arbeitsmedizin Sozialmedizin Umweltmedizin
Arbeitsmedizin Sozialmedizin Umweltmedizin Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信