CMA的第一个道德准则:医学道德还是借来的意识形态?

IF 0.7 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Naylor Cd
{"title":"CMA的第一个道德准则:医学道德还是借来的意识形态?","authors":"Naylor Cd","doi":"10.3138/JCS.17.4.20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1868, the Canadian Medical Association adopted its inaugural Code of Ethics. The Code was borrowed almost verbatim from the American Medical Association. This discussion focuses first on the context out of which the AMA/CMA Code arose; for like the AMA, the CMA was seeking to eliminate ’irregular’ practitioners and establish not only a clear-cut monopoly in provision of medical services, but also a well-defined professional identity for its members. The Code’s content is then analyzed to highlight a variety of paternalistic and monopolistic features conducive to the profession’s collective success. Finally, the points of contrast between the AMA and CMA Codes are documented, and explanations advanced for the alterations.","PeriodicalId":45057,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF CANADIAN STUDIES-REVUE D ETUDES CANADIENNES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"1983-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The CMA's first code of ethics: medical morality or borrowed ideology?\",\"authors\":\"Naylor Cd\",\"doi\":\"10.3138/JCS.17.4.20\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 1868, the Canadian Medical Association adopted its inaugural Code of Ethics. The Code was borrowed almost verbatim from the American Medical Association. This discussion focuses first on the context out of which the AMA/CMA Code arose; for like the AMA, the CMA was seeking to eliminate ’irregular’ practitioners and establish not only a clear-cut monopoly in provision of medical services, but also a well-defined professional identity for its members. The Code’s content is then analyzed to highlight a variety of paternalistic and monopolistic features conducive to the profession’s collective success. Finally, the points of contrast between the AMA and CMA Codes are documented, and explanations advanced for the alterations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF CANADIAN STUDIES-REVUE D ETUDES CANADIENNES\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"1983-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF CANADIAN STUDIES-REVUE D ETUDES CANADIENNES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3138/JCS.17.4.20\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF CANADIAN STUDIES-REVUE D ETUDES CANADIENNES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/JCS.17.4.20","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

1868年,加拿大医学协会通过了第一部《道德准则》。该法典几乎是逐字照搬自美国医学协会。本讨论首先侧重于AMA/CMA规范产生的背景;因为与美国医疗协会一样,美国医疗协会也在寻求消除"非正规"从业人员,不仅在提供医疗服务方面确立明确的垄断地位,而且为其成员确立明确的职业身份。然后分析该准则的内容,以突出有利于该行业集体成功的各种家长式和垄断特征。最后,AMA和CMA规范之间的对比点被记录下来,并对这些变化提出了解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The CMA's first code of ethics: medical morality or borrowed ideology?
In 1868, the Canadian Medical Association adopted its inaugural Code of Ethics. The Code was borrowed almost verbatim from the American Medical Association. This discussion focuses first on the context out of which the AMA/CMA Code arose; for like the AMA, the CMA was seeking to eliminate ’irregular’ practitioners and establish not only a clear-cut monopoly in provision of medical services, but also a well-defined professional identity for its members. The Code’s content is then analyzed to highlight a variety of paternalistic and monopolistic features conducive to the profession’s collective success. Finally, the points of contrast between the AMA and CMA Codes are documented, and explanations advanced for the alterations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信