遗忘追逐终止:棘手的情况

M. Calautti, Andreas Pieris
{"title":"遗忘追逐终止:棘手的情况","authors":"M. Calautti, Andreas Pieris","doi":"10.4230/LIPICS.ICDT.2019.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The chase procedure is one of the most fundamental algorithmic tools in database theory. A key algorithmic task is uniform chase termination, i.e., given a set of tuple-generating dependencies (tgds), is it the case that the chase under this set of tgds terminates, for every input database? In view of the fact that this problem is undecidable, no matter which version of the chase we consider, it is natural to ask whether well-behaved classes of tgds, introduced in different contexts such as ontological reasoning, make our problem decidable. In this work, we consider a prominent decidability paradigm for tgds, called stickiness. We show that for sticky sets of tgds, uniform chase termination is decidable if we focus on the (semi-)oblivious chase, and we pinpoint its exact complexity: PSPACE-complete in general, and NLOGSPACE-complete for predicates of bounded arity. These complexity results are obtained via graph-based syntactic characterizations of chase termination that are of independent interest. 2012 ACM Subject Classification Theory of Computation→Database query languages (principles), database constraints theory, logic and databases","PeriodicalId":90482,"journal":{"name":"Database theory-- ICDT : International Conference ... proceedings. International Conference on Database Theory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Oblivious Chase Termination: The Sticky Case\",\"authors\":\"M. Calautti, Andreas Pieris\",\"doi\":\"10.4230/LIPICS.ICDT.2019.17\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The chase procedure is one of the most fundamental algorithmic tools in database theory. A key algorithmic task is uniform chase termination, i.e., given a set of tuple-generating dependencies (tgds), is it the case that the chase under this set of tgds terminates, for every input database? In view of the fact that this problem is undecidable, no matter which version of the chase we consider, it is natural to ask whether well-behaved classes of tgds, introduced in different contexts such as ontological reasoning, make our problem decidable. In this work, we consider a prominent decidability paradigm for tgds, called stickiness. We show that for sticky sets of tgds, uniform chase termination is decidable if we focus on the (semi-)oblivious chase, and we pinpoint its exact complexity: PSPACE-complete in general, and NLOGSPACE-complete for predicates of bounded arity. These complexity results are obtained via graph-based syntactic characterizations of chase termination that are of independent interest. 2012 ACM Subject Classification Theory of Computation→Database query languages (principles), database constraints theory, logic and databases\",\"PeriodicalId\":90482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Database theory-- ICDT : International Conference ... proceedings. International Conference on Database Theory\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Database theory-- ICDT : International Conference ... proceedings. International Conference on Database Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPICS.ICDT.2019.17\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Database theory-- ICDT : International Conference ... proceedings. International Conference on Database Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPICS.ICDT.2019.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

追逐程序是数据库理论中最基本的算法工具之一。一个关键的算法任务是统一的追逐终止,即,给定一组元组生成依赖项(tgds),是否在这组tgds下的追逐终止,对于每个输入数据库?鉴于这个问题是不可判定的,无论我们考虑哪一种版本的追逐,我们都很自然地要问,在不同的背景下(如本体论推理)引入的行为良好的tgds类是否使我们的问题是可判定的。在这项工作中,我们考虑了tgds的一个突出的可决性范式,称为粘性。我们表明,对于tgds的粘性集,如果我们关注(半)遗忘追逐,则均匀追逐终止是可确定的,并且我们确定了其确切的复杂性:一般情况下为PSPACE-complete,对于有界性的谓词为NLOGSPACE-complete。这些复杂性结果是通过基于图的语法特征来获得的,这些特征是独立的。2012 ACM学科分类:计算理论→数据库查询语言(原理)、数据库约束理论、逻辑学与数据库
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Oblivious Chase Termination: The Sticky Case
The chase procedure is one of the most fundamental algorithmic tools in database theory. A key algorithmic task is uniform chase termination, i.e., given a set of tuple-generating dependencies (tgds), is it the case that the chase under this set of tgds terminates, for every input database? In view of the fact that this problem is undecidable, no matter which version of the chase we consider, it is natural to ask whether well-behaved classes of tgds, introduced in different contexts such as ontological reasoning, make our problem decidable. In this work, we consider a prominent decidability paradigm for tgds, called stickiness. We show that for sticky sets of tgds, uniform chase termination is decidable if we focus on the (semi-)oblivious chase, and we pinpoint its exact complexity: PSPACE-complete in general, and NLOGSPACE-complete for predicates of bounded arity. These complexity results are obtained via graph-based syntactic characterizations of chase termination that are of independent interest. 2012 ACM Subject Classification Theory of Computation→Database query languages (principles), database constraints theory, logic and databases
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信