中草药与非中草药牙膏齿面磨耗性的比较评价。

Vaibhav Tandon, Diya Kumari, Syed Amaan Ali
{"title":"中草药与非中草药牙膏齿面磨耗性的比较评价。","authors":"Vaibhav Tandon, Diya Kumari, Syed Amaan Ali","doi":"10.21276//ujds.2023.9.2.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Abrasion is the mechanical wearing of dental hard tissue and commonly affects cervical tooth structure. The main predisposing factors for abrasion are the tooth brushing method and the type of toothpaste used. Toothpaste is an important component in the etiology of abrasion. Most toothpaste contains abrasive agents for cleaning, maintaining, and improving tooth health. There are two types of toothpaste commercially available; synthetic and herbal formulations. Synthetic toothpastes typically contain abrasive agents, such as calcium phosphate, calcium carbonate, silica or hydrated silica for removing debris and stains. High amounts of abrasives in toothpastes may damage hard and soft tissues and dental restorations, leading to gingival recession, cervical abrasion and dentinal hypersensitivity. The purpose of this study is to investigate the abrasive effect of herbal toothpastes compared with non-herbal toothpaste. \n  \nMethods: 300 patients were randomly selected those who fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Subjects participating in this study were equally divided into 2 groups. Group A:  Herbal toothpaste, Group B:  Non Herbal tooth gel. The presence and type of cervical defects in each person will be diagnosing using the tooth wear index (TWI). \n  \nResults: Statistically significant difference was observed in value of enamel abrasion amongst Group A and B (p<0.05). Statistical analysis used in this study was one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) \n  \nConclusions: The least enamel abrasion was observed in non herbal tooth gel when compared with herbal toothpaste. \n ","PeriodicalId":100856,"journal":{"name":"King Saud University Journal of Dental Sciences","volume":"140 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative evaluation of Tooth Surface Abrasiveness of Herbal and Non-herbal Toothpaste.\",\"authors\":\"Vaibhav Tandon, Diya Kumari, Syed Amaan Ali\",\"doi\":\"10.21276//ujds.2023.9.2.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Abrasion is the mechanical wearing of dental hard tissue and commonly affects cervical tooth structure. The main predisposing factors for abrasion are the tooth brushing method and the type of toothpaste used. Toothpaste is an important component in the etiology of abrasion. Most toothpaste contains abrasive agents for cleaning, maintaining, and improving tooth health. There are two types of toothpaste commercially available; synthetic and herbal formulations. Synthetic toothpastes typically contain abrasive agents, such as calcium phosphate, calcium carbonate, silica or hydrated silica for removing debris and stains. High amounts of abrasives in toothpastes may damage hard and soft tissues and dental restorations, leading to gingival recession, cervical abrasion and dentinal hypersensitivity. The purpose of this study is to investigate the abrasive effect of herbal toothpastes compared with non-herbal toothpaste. \\n  \\nMethods: 300 patients were randomly selected those who fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Subjects participating in this study were equally divided into 2 groups. Group A:  Herbal toothpaste, Group B:  Non Herbal tooth gel. The presence and type of cervical defects in each person will be diagnosing using the tooth wear index (TWI). \\n  \\nResults: Statistically significant difference was observed in value of enamel abrasion amongst Group A and B (p<0.05). Statistical analysis used in this study was one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) \\n  \\nConclusions: The least enamel abrasion was observed in non herbal tooth gel when compared with herbal toothpaste. \\n \",\"PeriodicalId\":100856,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"King Saud University Journal of Dental Sciences\",\"volume\":\"140 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"King Saud University Journal of Dental Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21276//ujds.2023.9.2.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"King Saud University Journal of Dental Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21276//ujds.2023.9.2.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:磨蚀是牙齿硬组织的机械磨损,通常影响颈椎牙齿结构。造成牙齿磨损的主要因素是刷牙方法和使用的牙膏种类。牙膏是造成磨损的一个重要因素。大多数牙膏含有研磨剂,用于清洁、保养和改善牙齿健康。市面上有两种牙膏;合成和草药配方。合成牙膏通常含有研磨剂,如磷酸钙、碳酸钙、二氧化硅或水合二氧化硅,用于去除碎屑和污渍。牙膏中含有大量的磨料,可能会损害软硬组织和牙齿修复体,导致牙龈萎缩、颈椎磨损和牙本质过敏。本研究的目的是比较草药牙膏与非草药牙膏的磨蚀效果。方法:随机选取符合入选标准的患者300例。参与本研究的受试者平均分为两组。A组:草药牙膏,B组:非草药牙齿凝胶。每个人的颈椎缺陷的存在和类型将使用牙齿磨损指数(TWI)进行诊断。结果:A组与B组牙釉质磨损值比较,差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)。本研究采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)进行统计分析。结论:与草药牙膏相比,非草药牙凝胶的牙釉质磨损最小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative evaluation of Tooth Surface Abrasiveness of Herbal and Non-herbal Toothpaste.
Background: Abrasion is the mechanical wearing of dental hard tissue and commonly affects cervical tooth structure. The main predisposing factors for abrasion are the tooth brushing method and the type of toothpaste used. Toothpaste is an important component in the etiology of abrasion. Most toothpaste contains abrasive agents for cleaning, maintaining, and improving tooth health. There are two types of toothpaste commercially available; synthetic and herbal formulations. Synthetic toothpastes typically contain abrasive agents, such as calcium phosphate, calcium carbonate, silica or hydrated silica for removing debris and stains. High amounts of abrasives in toothpastes may damage hard and soft tissues and dental restorations, leading to gingival recession, cervical abrasion and dentinal hypersensitivity. The purpose of this study is to investigate the abrasive effect of herbal toothpastes compared with non-herbal toothpaste.   Methods: 300 patients were randomly selected those who fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Subjects participating in this study were equally divided into 2 groups. Group A:  Herbal toothpaste, Group B:  Non Herbal tooth gel. The presence and type of cervical defects in each person will be diagnosing using the tooth wear index (TWI).   Results: Statistically significant difference was observed in value of enamel abrasion amongst Group A and B (p<0.05). Statistical analysis used in this study was one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)   Conclusions: The least enamel abrasion was observed in non herbal tooth gel when compared with herbal toothpaste.  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信