bomong Ntala Labuan Bajo Regency国际语言中心(ILC)评估

É. Elin, Rr. Hasti Robiasih
{"title":"bomong Ntala Labuan Bajo Regency国际语言中心(ILC)评估","authors":"É. Elin, Rr. Hasti Robiasih","doi":"10.36597/JELP.V3I1.4503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This should be in one paragraph between 250-300 words. It must focus on: aims of the study, methods, findings, conclusions, and implications. This research aims to evaluate English Language Course of International Language Centre (ILC) Bombong Ntala Labuan Bajo Program particularly speaking skills based on the context, input, process, and product. This is an evaluation research that applied Stufflebeam's CIPP model (2007). The data were collected through observation, interview and document analysis. The data were analyzed using Miles, H. and Saldana’s flow model of qualitative data research that included data collection, data reduction, data display, conclusion, and verification. The findings revealed that evaluation in terms of Context evaluation, background of program vision and mission was supported to the context. The goal of ILC Bombong Ntala Course failed to meet the background, vision and mission because it did not promote the platform that aims to promote the institution to reach out more scopes of customers. Instead, it provided foreign languages courses (English and Spanish) to promote citizens’ language literacies, not only limited to such foreign languages, but also to create more possibilities for people to learn, for example, English for entrepreneurship, and English for tourism. In terms of Input evaluation, two teachers were not graduated from English department and the curriculum and syllabus of ILC Bombong Ntala Course show did not employ any determined curricula. The next evaluation is Process. The result of evaluation showed the processes of teaching and learning at the ILC Bombong Ntala Course could not run well. The last Product was the product evaluation. This evaluation proved that the outcome of English course program was not good effective enough to improve the students’ speaking skills.","PeriodicalId":32887,"journal":{"name":"Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice","volume":"107 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of International Language Centre (ILC) Bombong Ntala Labuan Bajo Regency\",\"authors\":\"É. Elin, Rr. Hasti Robiasih\",\"doi\":\"10.36597/JELP.V3I1.4503\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This should be in one paragraph between 250-300 words. It must focus on: aims of the study, methods, findings, conclusions, and implications. This research aims to evaluate English Language Course of International Language Centre (ILC) Bombong Ntala Labuan Bajo Program particularly speaking skills based on the context, input, process, and product. This is an evaluation research that applied Stufflebeam's CIPP model (2007). The data were collected through observation, interview and document analysis. The data were analyzed using Miles, H. and Saldana’s flow model of qualitative data research that included data collection, data reduction, data display, conclusion, and verification. The findings revealed that evaluation in terms of Context evaluation, background of program vision and mission was supported to the context. The goal of ILC Bombong Ntala Course failed to meet the background, vision and mission because it did not promote the platform that aims to promote the institution to reach out more scopes of customers. Instead, it provided foreign languages courses (English and Spanish) to promote citizens’ language literacies, not only limited to such foreign languages, but also to create more possibilities for people to learn, for example, English for entrepreneurship, and English for tourism. In terms of Input evaluation, two teachers were not graduated from English department and the curriculum and syllabus of ILC Bombong Ntala Course show did not employ any determined curricula. The next evaluation is Process. The result of evaluation showed the processes of teaching and learning at the ILC Bombong Ntala Course could not run well. The last Product was the product evaluation. This evaluation proved that the outcome of English course program was not good effective enough to improve the students’ speaking skills.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32887,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice\",\"volume\":\"107 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36597/JELP.V3I1.4503\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36597/JELP.V3I1.4503","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这应该在一个250-300字的段落中。它必须集中于:研究的目的、方法、发现、结论和影响。本研究旨在评估国际语言中心(ILC) bomong Ntala Labuan Bajo课程的英语语言课程,特别是基于上下文,输入,过程和产品的口语技能。这是一项应用Stufflebeam的CIPP模型(2007)的评估研究。采用观察法、访谈法和文献分析法收集数据。使用Miles, H.和saldana的定性数据研究流程模型对数据进行分析,该模型包括数据收集,数据简化,数据显示,结论和验证。研究结果表明,在背景评价、项目愿景背景和使命方面的评价支持背景。ILC bomong Ntala课程的目标未能满足其背景、愿景和使命,因为它没有推广旨在促进机构接触更多客户范围的平台。相反,它提供了外语课程(英语和西班牙语),以提高公民的语言素养,不仅限于这些外语,而且还为人们学习创造了更多的可能性,例如,创业英语和旅游英语。在输入评估方面,有两位教师不是英语系毕业的,ILC bomong Ntala课程展示的课程和教学大纲没有采用任何确定的课程。下一个评价是过程。评估结果显示,国际语言中心邦邦恩塔拉课程的教学过程并不顺利。最后一个产品是产品评估。这个评价证明了英语课程项目的效果不够好,不足以提高学生的口语能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of International Language Centre (ILC) Bombong Ntala Labuan Bajo Regency
This should be in one paragraph between 250-300 words. It must focus on: aims of the study, methods, findings, conclusions, and implications. This research aims to evaluate English Language Course of International Language Centre (ILC) Bombong Ntala Labuan Bajo Program particularly speaking skills based on the context, input, process, and product. This is an evaluation research that applied Stufflebeam's CIPP model (2007). The data were collected through observation, interview and document analysis. The data were analyzed using Miles, H. and Saldana’s flow model of qualitative data research that included data collection, data reduction, data display, conclusion, and verification. The findings revealed that evaluation in terms of Context evaluation, background of program vision and mission was supported to the context. The goal of ILC Bombong Ntala Course failed to meet the background, vision and mission because it did not promote the platform that aims to promote the institution to reach out more scopes of customers. Instead, it provided foreign languages courses (English and Spanish) to promote citizens’ language literacies, not only limited to such foreign languages, but also to create more possibilities for people to learn, for example, English for entrepreneurship, and English for tourism. In terms of Input evaluation, two teachers were not graduated from English department and the curriculum and syllabus of ILC Bombong Ntala Course show did not employ any determined curricula. The next evaluation is Process. The result of evaluation showed the processes of teaching and learning at the ILC Bombong Ntala Course could not run well. The last Product was the product evaluation. This evaluation proved that the outcome of English course program was not good effective enough to improve the students’ speaking skills.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信