不同心理理论水平青少年的社会能力

IF 0.5 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
E. Lebedeva
{"title":"不同心理理论水平青少年的社会能力","authors":"E. Lebedeva","doi":"10.31857/s020595920024342-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this study was to explore the role of theory of mind - the ability to attribute mental states to other people to explain their behavior - in the development of social competence and prosocial behavior in adolescence. It is assumed that there is a difference in the manifestation of prosocial behavior and social competence in adolescents with different levels of theory of mind. Participants were 95 adolescents aged 12–15 years (M=13.8; SD=9.5; 46 girls). We used “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” test to assess the social-perceptual component of theory of mind (assessment of the recognition of mental states by facial expressions) and the task of understanding higher-order false beliefs to assess the socio-cognitive component. We assessed the adolescent’s prosocial behavior during a group game of puzzles and calculated the ratio of the number of prosocial acts to time in seconds. Teachers assessed the social behavior of adolescents using a specially designed questionnaire. We also used a sociometric method to study the popularity of adolescents in the group. The results obtained testify to the different contribution of the socio-perceptual and socio-cognitive components of theory of mind to the development of social competence of adolescents. Adolescents who better understand the mental states of others and predict their behavior are more likely to act prosocially, are more persuasive and successful in mastering the school curriculum. Teachers are rated those who better recognize mental states by facial expressions as more helpful and popular among their peers. Adolescents with low level of theory of mind are rejected by their peers.","PeriodicalId":51778,"journal":{"name":"Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social Competence in Adolescents with Different Level of Theory of Mind\",\"authors\":\"E. Lebedeva\",\"doi\":\"10.31857/s020595920024342-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this study was to explore the role of theory of mind - the ability to attribute mental states to other people to explain their behavior - in the development of social competence and prosocial behavior in adolescence. It is assumed that there is a difference in the manifestation of prosocial behavior and social competence in adolescents with different levels of theory of mind. Participants were 95 adolescents aged 12–15 years (M=13.8; SD=9.5; 46 girls). We used “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” test to assess the social-perceptual component of theory of mind (assessment of the recognition of mental states by facial expressions) and the task of understanding higher-order false beliefs to assess the socio-cognitive component. We assessed the adolescent’s prosocial behavior during a group game of puzzles and calculated the ratio of the number of prosocial acts to time in seconds. Teachers assessed the social behavior of adolescents using a specially designed questionnaire. We also used a sociometric method to study the popularity of adolescents in the group. The results obtained testify to the different contribution of the socio-perceptual and socio-cognitive components of theory of mind to the development of social competence of adolescents. Adolescents who better understand the mental states of others and predict their behavior are more likely to act prosocially, are more persuasive and successful in mastering the school curriculum. Teachers are rated those who better recognize mental states by facial expressions as more helpful and popular among their peers. Adolescents with low level of theory of mind are rejected by their peers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51778,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31857/s020595920024342-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31857/s020595920024342-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是探讨心理理论在青少年社会能力和亲社会行为发展中的作用。心理理论是一种将心理状态归因于他人以解释其行为的能力。假设不同心理理论水平的青少年在亲社会行为和社会能力的表现上存在差异。参与者为95名12-15岁的青少年(M=13.8;SD = 9.5;46个女孩)。我们使用“通过眼睛读心”测试来评估心理理论的社会感知部分(通过面部表情评估对心理状态的识别),并使用理解高阶错误信念的任务来评估社会认知部分。我们在一组拼图游戏中评估了青少年的亲社会行为,并以秒为单位计算了亲社会行为的数量与时间的比率。教师们用一份特别设计的问卷来评估青少年的社会行为。我们还使用社会计量学方法来研究青少年在该组中的受欢迎程度。研究结果证实了心理理论的社会知觉和社会认知成分对青少年社会能力发展的不同贡献。更好地理解他人心理状态并预测他人行为的青少年更有可能采取亲社会行为,更有说服力,在掌握学校课程方面也更成功。老师们认为,那些能通过面部表情更好地识别心理状态的人更乐于助人,在同龄人中更受欢迎。心理理论水平低的青少年容易被同龄人排斥。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Social Competence in Adolescents with Different Level of Theory of Mind
The aim of this study was to explore the role of theory of mind - the ability to attribute mental states to other people to explain their behavior - in the development of social competence and prosocial behavior in adolescence. It is assumed that there is a difference in the manifestation of prosocial behavior and social competence in adolescents with different levels of theory of mind. Participants were 95 adolescents aged 12–15 years (M=13.8; SD=9.5; 46 girls). We used “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” test to assess the social-perceptual component of theory of mind (assessment of the recognition of mental states by facial expressions) and the task of understanding higher-order false beliefs to assess the socio-cognitive component. We assessed the adolescent’s prosocial behavior during a group game of puzzles and calculated the ratio of the number of prosocial acts to time in seconds. Teachers assessed the social behavior of adolescents using a specially designed questionnaire. We also used a sociometric method to study the popularity of adolescents in the group. The results obtained testify to the different contribution of the socio-perceptual and socio-cognitive components of theory of mind to the development of social competence of adolescents. Adolescents who better understand the mental states of others and predict their behavior are more likely to act prosocially, are more persuasive and successful in mastering the school curriculum. Teachers are rated those who better recognize mental states by facial expressions as more helpful and popular among their peers. Adolescents with low level of theory of mind are rejected by their peers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal
Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
60.00%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Psikhologicheskii zhurnal is a publication of the Russian Academy of Sciences and the RAS Institute of Psychology. This determines its contents, academical style, and the form of papers published in it. The journal publishes the papers on the fundamental problems of psychology, its methodological, theoretical, and experimental foundations, and also the results of the investigations connected with the applied problems of social and scientific life. The discussions published on the page of the journal contribute to the revelation of general tendencies in the development of psychology and its approximation to practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信