荷兰语np语素句法一致与索引一致

F. V. Eynde
{"title":"荷兰语np语素句法一致与索引一致","authors":"F. V. Eynde","doi":"10.1163/9789004334441_010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For the treatment of agreement in Dutch NPs I adopt a distinction, familiar from HPSG, between morphosyntactic agreement and index agreement. In order to determine their respective roles, I make another distinction, proposed in Van Eynde (2003), between marked and unmarked nominals. Employing these distinctions, I will demonstrate that the combination of prenominal adjectives and determiners with unmarked nominals is subject to morphosyntactic agreement, whereas the combination of these prenominals with marked nominals is subject to index agreement.","PeriodicalId":82998,"journal":{"name":"The Clinician","volume":"193 1","pages":"111-127"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Morpho-Syntactic Agreement and Index Agreement in Dutch NPs\",\"authors\":\"F. V. Eynde\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/9789004334441_010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For the treatment of agreement in Dutch NPs I adopt a distinction, familiar from HPSG, between morphosyntactic agreement and index agreement. In order to determine their respective roles, I make another distinction, proposed in Van Eynde (2003), between marked and unmarked nominals. Employing these distinctions, I will demonstrate that the combination of prenominal adjectives and determiners with unmarked nominals is subject to morphosyntactic agreement, whereas the combination of these prenominals with marked nominals is subject to index agreement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":82998,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Clinician\",\"volume\":\"193 1\",\"pages\":\"111-127\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Clinician\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004334441_010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Clinician","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004334441_010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

对于荷兰NPs中一致性的处理,我采用了一种与HPSG相似的区分,即形态句法一致性和索引一致性。为了确定它们各自的作用,我在Van Eynde(2003)中提出了另一种区分,即标记和未标记的名词。利用这些区别,我将证明,前名形容词和限定词与未标记的名词的组合服从形态句法的一致性,而这些前名形容词和有标记的名词的组合服从索引的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Morpho-Syntactic Agreement and Index Agreement in Dutch NPs
For the treatment of agreement in Dutch NPs I adopt a distinction, familiar from HPSG, between morphosyntactic agreement and index agreement. In order to determine their respective roles, I make another distinction, proposed in Van Eynde (2003), between marked and unmarked nominals. Employing these distinctions, I will demonstrate that the combination of prenominal adjectives and determiners with unmarked nominals is subject to morphosyntactic agreement, whereas the combination of these prenominals with marked nominals is subject to index agreement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信