我们就不能好好相处吗?公民科学家与算法互动

Marisa Ponti, Laure Kloetzer, Grant Miller, F. Ostermann, S. Schade
{"title":"我们就不能好好相处吗?公民科学家与算法互动","authors":"Marisa Ponti, Laure Kloetzer, Grant Miller, F. Ostermann, S. Schade","doi":"10.15346/hc.v8i2.128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"  \nResponding to the continued and accelerating rise of Machine Learning (ML) in citizen science, we organized a discussion panel at the 3rd European Citizen Science 2020 Conference to initiate a dialogue on how citizen scientists interact and collaborate with algorithms. This brief summarizes a presentation about two Zooniverse projects which illustrated the impact that new developments in ML are having on citizen science projects which involve visual inspection of large datasets. We also share the results of a poll to elicit opinions and ideas from the audience on two statements, one positive and one critical of using ML in CS. The discussion with the participants raised several issues that we grouped into four main themes: a) democracy and participation; b) skill-biased technological change; c) data ownership vs public domain/digital commons, and d) transparency. All these issues warrant further research for those who are concerned about ML in citizen science. \n ","PeriodicalId":92785,"journal":{"name":"Human computation (Fairfax, Va.)","volume":"27 1","pages":"5-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can't we all just get along? Citizen scientists interacting with algorithms\",\"authors\":\"Marisa Ponti, Laure Kloetzer, Grant Miller, F. Ostermann, S. Schade\",\"doi\":\"10.15346/hc.v8i2.128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"  \\nResponding to the continued and accelerating rise of Machine Learning (ML) in citizen science, we organized a discussion panel at the 3rd European Citizen Science 2020 Conference to initiate a dialogue on how citizen scientists interact and collaborate with algorithms. This brief summarizes a presentation about two Zooniverse projects which illustrated the impact that new developments in ML are having on citizen science projects which involve visual inspection of large datasets. We also share the results of a poll to elicit opinions and ideas from the audience on two statements, one positive and one critical of using ML in CS. The discussion with the participants raised several issues that we grouped into four main themes: a) democracy and participation; b) skill-biased technological change; c) data ownership vs public domain/digital commons, and d) transparency. All these issues warrant further research for those who are concerned about ML in citizen science. \\n \",\"PeriodicalId\":92785,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human computation (Fairfax, Va.)\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"5-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human computation (Fairfax, Va.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15346/hc.v8i2.128\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human computation (Fairfax, Va.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15346/hc.v8i2.128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

为了应对公民科学中机器学习(ML)的持续和加速增长,我们在第三届欧洲公民科学2020会议上组织了一个讨论小组,就公民科学家如何与算法互动和协作展开对话。本摘要总结了关于两个Zooniverse项目的介绍,这些项目说明了ML的新发展对涉及大型数据集视觉检查的公民科学项目的影响。我们还分享了一项民意调查的结果,以征求观众对CS中使用ML的两种说法的意见和想法,一种是积极的,一种是批评的。与参与者的讨论提出了几个问题,我们将其分为四个主题:a)民主与参与;B)技能偏向的技术变革;C)数据所有权vs公共领域/数字共享,d)透明度。所有这些问题都值得那些关注公民科学中的ML的人进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can't we all just get along? Citizen scientists interacting with algorithms
  Responding to the continued and accelerating rise of Machine Learning (ML) in citizen science, we organized a discussion panel at the 3rd European Citizen Science 2020 Conference to initiate a dialogue on how citizen scientists interact and collaborate with algorithms. This brief summarizes a presentation about two Zooniverse projects which illustrated the impact that new developments in ML are having on citizen science projects which involve visual inspection of large datasets. We also share the results of a poll to elicit opinions and ideas from the audience on two statements, one positive and one critical of using ML in CS. The discussion with the participants raised several issues that we grouped into four main themes: a) democracy and participation; b) skill-biased technological change; c) data ownership vs public domain/digital commons, and d) transparency. All these issues warrant further research for those who are concerned about ML in citizen science.  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信