{"title":"脊髓麻醉中的镇静作用:右美托咪定与咪达唑仑输注的比较。","authors":"K. Savant, H. Patel, V. Patel","doi":"10.7439/IJBAR.V8I5.4183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To study the effects of intravenous dexmedetomidine infusion and compare it with intravenous midazolam infusion during spinal anaesthesia (S/A) with regards to effect on psychomotor performance, memory and any side effect. Materials Methods: A prospective randomized double blind study was conducted on 60 patients of ASA I to III, scheduled for lower abdominal or lower limb surgery under S/A. All patients were randomly divided into two groups of 30 each; randomization was done by computer generated random numbers. In Group D, dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg and In Group M, midazolam 0.04 mg/kg basal infusion for 10 min then S/A was given with hyperbaric bupivacaine (0.5%). After achieving required level of S/A; position given and then infusion of inj. Dexmedetomidine 0.5µg/kg/hr in group D and Inj. Midazolam 0.04mg/kg/hr by infusion started. Both psychomotor and memory test were performed before study drug infusion and after 1 and 4 hour of stoppage of infusion. Results: Thus, in both the groups, psychomotor performance was not significantly changed as compared to baseline at 1 hour and 4 hour after stoppage of infusion. There was significantly decreased in recall of picture, after 1 hour of study drug infusion in both the groups (anterograde amnesia); which was regained at 1 hour after stoppage of infusion. The mean time required to achieved sedation score (RSS) of 3 were statistically significant shorter in group D as compared to in group M (P 0.05). Conclusion: Thus, we conclude that, Dexmedetomidine provide rapid onset of arousable sedation without causing respiratory and cardiovascular depression. It provides anterograde amnesia with rapid recovery of psychomotor function.","PeriodicalId":13848,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Biomedical and Advance Research","volume":"147 1","pages":"228-232"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sedation during spinal anaesthesia : A comparison between Dexmedetomidine and midazolam infusion.\",\"authors\":\"K. Savant, H. Patel, V. Patel\",\"doi\":\"10.7439/IJBAR.V8I5.4183\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To study the effects of intravenous dexmedetomidine infusion and compare it with intravenous midazolam infusion during spinal anaesthesia (S/A) with regards to effect on psychomotor performance, memory and any side effect. Materials Methods: A prospective randomized double blind study was conducted on 60 patients of ASA I to III, scheduled for lower abdominal or lower limb surgery under S/A. All patients were randomly divided into two groups of 30 each; randomization was done by computer generated random numbers. In Group D, dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg and In Group M, midazolam 0.04 mg/kg basal infusion for 10 min then S/A was given with hyperbaric bupivacaine (0.5%). After achieving required level of S/A; position given and then infusion of inj. Dexmedetomidine 0.5µg/kg/hr in group D and Inj. Midazolam 0.04mg/kg/hr by infusion started. Both psychomotor and memory test were performed before study drug infusion and after 1 and 4 hour of stoppage of infusion. Results: Thus, in both the groups, psychomotor performance was not significantly changed as compared to baseline at 1 hour and 4 hour after stoppage of infusion. There was significantly decreased in recall of picture, after 1 hour of study drug infusion in both the groups (anterograde amnesia); which was regained at 1 hour after stoppage of infusion. The mean time required to achieved sedation score (RSS) of 3 were statistically significant shorter in group D as compared to in group M (P 0.05). Conclusion: Thus, we conclude that, Dexmedetomidine provide rapid onset of arousable sedation without causing respiratory and cardiovascular depression. It provides anterograde amnesia with rapid recovery of psychomotor function.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13848,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Biomedical and Advance Research\",\"volume\":\"147 1\",\"pages\":\"228-232\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Biomedical and Advance Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7439/IJBAR.V8I5.4183\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Biomedical and Advance Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7439/IJBAR.V8I5.4183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
目的:探讨右美托咪定与咪达唑仑在脊髓麻醉(S/A)过程中对精神运动表现、记忆的影响及不良反应。方法:采用前瞻性随机双盲研究,对60例ASA I ~ III级患者进行S/A下腹部或下肢手术。所有患者随机分为两组,每组30人;随机化是由计算机生成的随机数完成的。D组右美托咪定1 μg/kg, M组咪达唑仑0.04 mg/kg基础静脉滴注10 min后加0.5%布比卡因高压S/A。在达到要求的S/A水平后;给予体位,注射。右美托咪定0.5µg/kg/hr, D组和注射组。开始滴注咪达唑仑0.04mg/kg/hr。在研究药物输注前、停药1小时、停药4小时分别进行精神运动和记忆测试。结果:因此,两组在停止输注后1小时和4小时的精神运动表现与基线相比没有显著变化。研究药物输注1小时后,两组患者对图片的回忆能力均显著下降(顺行性遗忘);停药后1小时恢复。D组达到镇静评分(RSS) 3分的平均所需时间较M组短,差异有统计学意义(p0.05)。结论:右美托咪定提供快速起效的可唤醒镇静,而不引起呼吸和心血管抑制。它提供了顺行性健忘症与快速恢复精神运动功能。
Sedation during spinal anaesthesia : A comparison between Dexmedetomidine and midazolam infusion.
Objective: To study the effects of intravenous dexmedetomidine infusion and compare it with intravenous midazolam infusion during spinal anaesthesia (S/A) with regards to effect on psychomotor performance, memory and any side effect. Materials Methods: A prospective randomized double blind study was conducted on 60 patients of ASA I to III, scheduled for lower abdominal or lower limb surgery under S/A. All patients were randomly divided into two groups of 30 each; randomization was done by computer generated random numbers. In Group D, dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg and In Group M, midazolam 0.04 mg/kg basal infusion for 10 min then S/A was given with hyperbaric bupivacaine (0.5%). After achieving required level of S/A; position given and then infusion of inj. Dexmedetomidine 0.5µg/kg/hr in group D and Inj. Midazolam 0.04mg/kg/hr by infusion started. Both psychomotor and memory test were performed before study drug infusion and after 1 and 4 hour of stoppage of infusion. Results: Thus, in both the groups, psychomotor performance was not significantly changed as compared to baseline at 1 hour and 4 hour after stoppage of infusion. There was significantly decreased in recall of picture, after 1 hour of study drug infusion in both the groups (anterograde amnesia); which was regained at 1 hour after stoppage of infusion. The mean time required to achieved sedation score (RSS) of 3 were statistically significant shorter in group D as compared to in group M (P 0.05). Conclusion: Thus, we conclude that, Dexmedetomidine provide rapid onset of arousable sedation without causing respiratory and cardiovascular depression. It provides anterograde amnesia with rapid recovery of psychomotor function.