图片-文字干扰的输入、决定和反应因素

S. Lupker, A. Katz
{"title":"图片-文字干扰的输入、决定和反应因素","authors":"S. Lupker, A. Katz","doi":"10.1037/0278-7393.7.4.269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two variations of the picture-word analogue of the Stroop task were examined in an effort to gain a better understanding of the processes involved in responding to picture-word stimuli. Four stages in this process were outlined and then evaluated as potential sources of the interference in these types of tasks. In Experiment 1 subjects were required to respond yes or no (vocally or manually) to whether the picture was that of a dog. In Experiment 2 subjects were asked to respond by naming the picture's semantic category. Taken together, the results of these experiments indicate that (a) input factors contribute very little to the interference observed, (b) in certain situations some of the interference is due to an interaction of the semantic information from the word and the picture during a decision process, and (c) the response selection and output processes account for most of the interference but only in situations in which the word's name is potentially a response. Implications of these results for the study of automatic semantic processing of words are discussed. As Quillian (1968) pointed out over 12 years ago, an individual's storehouse of information about any well-known concept is virtually limitless; yet of this information","PeriodicalId":76919,"journal":{"name":"Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory","volume":"141 1","pages":"269-282"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1981-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"90","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Input, Decision, and Response Factors in Picture-Word Interference\",\"authors\":\"S. Lupker, A. Katz\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/0278-7393.7.4.269\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Two variations of the picture-word analogue of the Stroop task were examined in an effort to gain a better understanding of the processes involved in responding to picture-word stimuli. Four stages in this process were outlined and then evaluated as potential sources of the interference in these types of tasks. In Experiment 1 subjects were required to respond yes or no (vocally or manually) to whether the picture was that of a dog. In Experiment 2 subjects were asked to respond by naming the picture's semantic category. Taken together, the results of these experiments indicate that (a) input factors contribute very little to the interference observed, (b) in certain situations some of the interference is due to an interaction of the semantic information from the word and the picture during a decision process, and (c) the response selection and output processes account for most of the interference but only in situations in which the word's name is potentially a response. Implications of these results for the study of automatic semantic processing of words are discussed. As Quillian (1968) pointed out over 12 years ago, an individual's storehouse of information about any well-known concept is virtually limitless; yet of this information\",\"PeriodicalId\":76919,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory\",\"volume\":\"141 1\",\"pages\":\"269-282\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1981-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"90\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.7.4.269\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.7.4.269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 90

摘要

为了更好地理解对图片-单词刺激的反应过程,研究人员对Stroop任务的两种图片-单词模拟进行了研究。概述了这一过程的四个阶段,然后评估了这些类型任务中潜在的干扰源。在实验1中,受试者被要求对图片是否是狗的回答是或否(口头或手动)。在实验2中,受试者被要求说出图片的语义类别。综上所述,这些实验的结果表明:(a)输入因素对观察到的干扰贡献很小,(b)在某些情况下,一些干扰是由于在决策过程中来自单词和图片的语义信息的相互作用造成的,以及(c)响应选择和输出过程占了大部分干扰,但仅在单词名称可能是响应的情况下。本文还讨论了这些结果对词汇语义自动处理研究的启示。正如Quillian(1968)在12年前指出的那样,一个人关于任何已知概念的信息宝库实际上是无限的;然而这些信息
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Input, Decision, and Response Factors in Picture-Word Interference
Two variations of the picture-word analogue of the Stroop task were examined in an effort to gain a better understanding of the processes involved in responding to picture-word stimuli. Four stages in this process were outlined and then evaluated as potential sources of the interference in these types of tasks. In Experiment 1 subjects were required to respond yes or no (vocally or manually) to whether the picture was that of a dog. In Experiment 2 subjects were asked to respond by naming the picture's semantic category. Taken together, the results of these experiments indicate that (a) input factors contribute very little to the interference observed, (b) in certain situations some of the interference is due to an interaction of the semantic information from the word and the picture during a decision process, and (c) the response selection and output processes account for most of the interference but only in situations in which the word's name is potentially a response. Implications of these results for the study of automatic semantic processing of words are discussed. As Quillian (1968) pointed out over 12 years ago, an individual's storehouse of information about any well-known concept is virtually limitless; yet of this information
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信