转基因大豆品种对白双花的干扰及阈值水平

L. Galon, Alessandro Konzen, M. Bagnara, L. Brunetto, I. Aspiazú, Antônio Marcos Loureiro Da Silva, Daiane Brandler, Hugo Von Linsingen Piazzetta, A. L. Radünz, G. F. Perin
{"title":"转基因大豆品种对白双花的干扰及阈值水平","authors":"L. Galon, Alessandro Konzen, M. Bagnara, L. Brunetto, I. Aspiazú, Antônio Marcos Loureiro Da Silva, Daiane Brandler, Hugo Von Linsingen Piazzetta, A. L. Radünz, G. F. Perin","doi":"10.48162/rev.39.086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis study aimed to assess the interference and threshold level (TL) of Sida rhombifolia, the arrowleaf sida, competing with different soybean cultivars. The treatments comprised different soybean cultivars (NS 6909, NA 5909, DM 5958, Brasmax ELITE, Brasmax LANÇA, and SYN 13561) and densities of arrowleaf sida plants per square meter (m-2) (0, 2, 3, 4, 9, 15, 16, 23, 22, and 58; 0, 2, 3, 3, 6, 6, 10, 11, 18, and 47; 0, 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11, 13, 15, and 24; 0, 1, 4, 6, 12, 18, 19, 31, 44, and 50; 0, 4, 5, 6, 9, 13, 17, 20, 20, and 47; 0, 2, 3, 5, 9, 11, 15, 18, 29, and 30, respectively) for each cultivar. Cultivars NS 6909, NA 5909, and Brasmax Lança were more competitive than DM 5958, Brasmax Elite, and SYN 13561. The TL values varied from 0.55 to 0.95 plants m-2 for cultivars NS 6909, NA 5909, and Brasmax Lança, which exhibited greater competitiveness with arrowleaf sida. The lowest values of TL varied from 0.26 to 0.61 plants m-2 for cultivars DM 5958, Brasmax Elite, and SYN 13561, which had less competitiveness with weed.\nHighlights\n\nThe rectangular hyperbola model adequately estimates the grain yield losses of soybean cultivars.\nThe density of arrowleaf sida plants was the variable that best fitted the rectangular hyperbola model.\n Soybean cultivars NS 6909 IPRO, NA 5909 RG, and Brasmax Lança IPRO are the most competitive in the presence of arrowleaf sida.\nThe levels of economic damage decrease with the increase in grain yield, in the soybean price, with the reduction in the cost of controlling arrowleaf sida and the herbicide efficiency.\n\n ","PeriodicalId":21210,"journal":{"name":"Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias UNCuyo","volume":"156 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interference and threshold level of Sida rhombifolia in transgenic soybean cultivars\",\"authors\":\"L. Galon, Alessandro Konzen, M. Bagnara, L. Brunetto, I. Aspiazú, Antônio Marcos Loureiro Da Silva, Daiane Brandler, Hugo Von Linsingen Piazzetta, A. L. Radünz, G. F. Perin\",\"doi\":\"10.48162/rev.39.086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nThis study aimed to assess the interference and threshold level (TL) of Sida rhombifolia, the arrowleaf sida, competing with different soybean cultivars. The treatments comprised different soybean cultivars (NS 6909, NA 5909, DM 5958, Brasmax ELITE, Brasmax LANÇA, and SYN 13561) and densities of arrowleaf sida plants per square meter (m-2) (0, 2, 3, 4, 9, 15, 16, 23, 22, and 58; 0, 2, 3, 3, 6, 6, 10, 11, 18, and 47; 0, 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11, 13, 15, and 24; 0, 1, 4, 6, 12, 18, 19, 31, 44, and 50; 0, 4, 5, 6, 9, 13, 17, 20, 20, and 47; 0, 2, 3, 5, 9, 11, 15, 18, 29, and 30, respectively) for each cultivar. Cultivars NS 6909, NA 5909, and Brasmax Lança were more competitive than DM 5958, Brasmax Elite, and SYN 13561. The TL values varied from 0.55 to 0.95 plants m-2 for cultivars NS 6909, NA 5909, and Brasmax Lança, which exhibited greater competitiveness with arrowleaf sida. The lowest values of TL varied from 0.26 to 0.61 plants m-2 for cultivars DM 5958, Brasmax Elite, and SYN 13561, which had less competitiveness with weed.\\nHighlights\\n\\nThe rectangular hyperbola model adequately estimates the grain yield losses of soybean cultivars.\\nThe density of arrowleaf sida plants was the variable that best fitted the rectangular hyperbola model.\\n Soybean cultivars NS 6909 IPRO, NA 5909 RG, and Brasmax Lança IPRO are the most competitive in the presence of arrowleaf sida.\\nThe levels of economic damage decrease with the increase in grain yield, in the soybean price, with the reduction in the cost of controlling arrowleaf sida and the herbicide efficiency.\\n\\n \",\"PeriodicalId\":21210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias UNCuyo\",\"volume\":\"156 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias UNCuyo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.48162/rev.39.086\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias UNCuyo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48162/rev.39.086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究旨在评价箭叶双叶豆与不同大豆品种竞争的干扰和阈值水平(TL)。不同大豆品种(NS 6909、NA 5909、DM 5958、Brasmax ELITE、Brasmax LANÇA和SYN 13561)和箭叶叶豆密度(0、2、3、4、9、15、16、23、22和58)/ m2;0、2、3、3、6、6、10、11、18、47;0、3、4、7、8、10、11、13、15、24;0、1、4、6、12、18、19、31、44、50;0、4、5、6、9、13、17、20、20、47;分别为0、2、3、5、9、11、15、18、29和30)。品种NS 6909、NA 5909和Brasmax lanpada比DM 5958、Brasmax Elite和SYN 13561更具竞争力。品种NS 6909、NA 5909和Brasmax lana的TL值在0.55 ~ 0.95株m-2之间,表现出较强的竞争优势。DM 5958、Brasmax Elite和SYN 13561的TL最低值为0.26 ~ 0.61株m-2,与杂草竞争能力较弱。利用矩形双曲线模型可以很好地估计大豆品种的产量损失。箭头叶的密度是最适合矩形双曲线模型的变量。大豆品种NS 6909 IPRO、NA 5909 RG和Brasmax lana IPRO在箭叶病存在时最具竞争力。随着粮食产量的增加、大豆价格的上涨、防治黄叶枯病成本的降低和除草剂使用效率的降低,黄叶枯病的经济危害程度也随之降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interference and threshold level of Sida rhombifolia in transgenic soybean cultivars
This study aimed to assess the interference and threshold level (TL) of Sida rhombifolia, the arrowleaf sida, competing with different soybean cultivars. The treatments comprised different soybean cultivars (NS 6909, NA 5909, DM 5958, Brasmax ELITE, Brasmax LANÇA, and SYN 13561) and densities of arrowleaf sida plants per square meter (m-2) (0, 2, 3, 4, 9, 15, 16, 23, 22, and 58; 0, 2, 3, 3, 6, 6, 10, 11, 18, and 47; 0, 3, 4, 7, 8, 10, 11, 13, 15, and 24; 0, 1, 4, 6, 12, 18, 19, 31, 44, and 50; 0, 4, 5, 6, 9, 13, 17, 20, 20, and 47; 0, 2, 3, 5, 9, 11, 15, 18, 29, and 30, respectively) for each cultivar. Cultivars NS 6909, NA 5909, and Brasmax Lança were more competitive than DM 5958, Brasmax Elite, and SYN 13561. The TL values varied from 0.55 to 0.95 plants m-2 for cultivars NS 6909, NA 5909, and Brasmax Lança, which exhibited greater competitiveness with arrowleaf sida. The lowest values of TL varied from 0.26 to 0.61 plants m-2 for cultivars DM 5958, Brasmax Elite, and SYN 13561, which had less competitiveness with weed. Highlights The rectangular hyperbola model adequately estimates the grain yield losses of soybean cultivars. The density of arrowleaf sida plants was the variable that best fitted the rectangular hyperbola model.  Soybean cultivars NS 6909 IPRO, NA 5909 RG, and Brasmax Lança IPRO are the most competitive in the presence of arrowleaf sida. The levels of economic damage decrease with the increase in grain yield, in the soybean price, with the reduction in the cost of controlling arrowleaf sida and the herbicide efficiency.  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信