Dušan Aleksić, Ivana Stamenković
{"title":"МИГРАНТСКА И ИЗБЕГЛИЧКА КРИЗА: КОМПАРАТИВНИ ПРИКАЗ ИЗВЕШТАВАЊА ДНЕВНИХ ЛИСТОВА БЛИЦ, ПОЛИТИКА И КУРИР","authors":"Dušan Aleksić, Ivana Stamenković","doi":"10.22190/teme171213051a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Intensive migrations during the last years of the 20th century and in the beginning of the 21st century are an important part of modern societies which are becoming multicultural. While information, ideas and people cross countries’ borders all the time, and term „nation“ is becoming outdated in new communication universe, the foundations of identity are becoming weak, unstable and subject to change. In crisis, media reporting about groups which are not culturally close to the native population significantly influences the public opinion creating, since direct contacts with such groups are limited and rare. Besides, the question arises to what extent such reporting is subject to the ethical codes.    In this paper, media reporting about recent European migrant and refugee crisis was analyzed. The paper is primarily focused on media representation of migrants and refugees which was analyzed through several aspects: frequency of texts about migrants and refugees, the analysis of genres, titles, visual presentation, respect of journalistic ethics as well as examination of rhetorical, stylistic and manipulative means that were used. All texts about migrant and refugee crisis published over a period of two weeks on three informative web-portals – „Blic“, „Kurir“ and „Politika“ were analyzed. The first analyzed week was from June 1st to September 7th, 2015, while the second week was from March 1st to March 7th, 2017. The goal of this comparative analysis of media texts was to determine possible differences in the way migrants and refugees are portrayed in media texts. The main goal was to determine diferences between three informative portals in terms of emphasis certain aspects of migrant and refugee crisis as well as in terms of emphasis certain characteristics of this social group.","PeriodicalId":85157,"journal":{"name":"Migracijske teme","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Migracijske teme","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22190/teme171213051a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

20世纪最后几年和21世纪初的密集移民是现代社会多元文化发展的重要组成部分。信息、思想和人无时无刻不在跨越国界,“国家”一词在新的传播宇宙中变得过时,身份的基础变得脆弱、不稳定和易变。在危机中,媒体对文化上与土著人口不接近的群体的报道对舆论的形成产生了重大影响,因为与这些群体的直接接触是有限和罕见的。此外,出现了这样的报告在多大程度上受道德准则的约束的问题。本文对近期欧洲移民和难民危机的媒体报道进行了分析。本文主要关注移民和难民的媒体代表性,通过几个方面进行分析:关于移民和难民的文本频率,对体裁,标题,视觉呈现的分析,对新闻伦理的尊重,以及对所使用的修辞,风格和操纵手段的检查。研究人员分析了“公共”、“Kurir”和“Politika”这三个资讯门户网站在两周内发表的所有有关移民和难民危机的文章。第一个分析周为2015年6月1日至9月7日,第二个分析周为2017年3月1日至3月7日。对媒体文本进行比较分析的目的是确定媒体文本中描绘移民和难民的方式可能存在的差异。主要目标是确定三个信息门户网站在强调移民和难民危机的某些方面以及强调这一社会群体的某些特征方面的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
МИГРАНТСКА И ИЗБЕГЛИЧКА КРИЗА: КОМПАРАТИВНИ ПРИКАЗ ИЗВЕШТАВАЊА ДНЕВНИХ ЛИСТОВА БЛИЦ, ПОЛИТИКА И КУРИР
Intensive migrations during the last years of the 20th century and in the beginning of the 21st century are an important part of modern societies which are becoming multicultural. While information, ideas and people cross countries’ borders all the time, and term „nation“ is becoming outdated in new communication universe, the foundations of identity are becoming weak, unstable and subject to change. In crisis, media reporting about groups which are not culturally close to the native population significantly influences the public opinion creating, since direct contacts with such groups are limited and rare. Besides, the question arises to what extent such reporting is subject to the ethical codes.    In this paper, media reporting about recent European migrant and refugee crisis was analyzed. The paper is primarily focused on media representation of migrants and refugees which was analyzed through several aspects: frequency of texts about migrants and refugees, the analysis of genres, titles, visual presentation, respect of journalistic ethics as well as examination of rhetorical, stylistic and manipulative means that were used. All texts about migrant and refugee crisis published over a period of two weeks on three informative web-portals – „Blic“, „Kurir“ and „Politika“ were analyzed. The first analyzed week was from June 1st to September 7th, 2015, while the second week was from March 1st to March 7th, 2017. The goal of this comparative analysis of media texts was to determine possible differences in the way migrants and refugees are portrayed in media texts. The main goal was to determine diferences between three informative portals in terms of emphasis certain aspects of migrant and refugee crisis as well as in terms of emphasis certain characteristics of this social group.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信