{"title":"用Q方法论增强社会媒体研究:一些指导原则","authors":"Charmaine du Plessis","doi":"10.34190/jbrm.17.3.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper proposes that social media studies could be\n complemented with Q methodology when a topic that plays out in\n social media is complex, controversial or sensitive to allow for\n deep‑seated, integrated online and off‑line perspectives. Although\n the Fourth Industrial Revolution brought researchers more\n opportunities and advantages to study topics that were previously\n inaccessible, using technologies for research does not come without\n challenges. This is especially the case with social media studies\n comprising large datasets and where it is not always possible to\n identify fake profiles, bots, spam or manipulated information\n without having access to advanced data analysis software. Another\n point is that views expressed in social media do not always\n represent offline perspectives. However, while Q methodology has,\n over the years, adapted its techniques to accommodate new\n technologies, more can be done to embrace a web 2.0 environment. Why\n and how social media studies could be augmented with Q methodology\n to reveal individuals’ perspectives and attitudes about topics will\n be examined and potential difficulties will be highlighted. Not yet\n a mainstream method, Q methodology combines the strengths of two\n robust qualitative and quantitative methods sequentially to reveal\n and isolate the subjective perspectives of groups of participants.\n This methodology could, therefore, be useful when a social media\n study puts forward novel ideas and findings that should be supported\n by offline views. In this regard, the paper provides some guidelines\n by referring to the five phases of a Q study and describing how a\n social media study could not only benefit from but also apply Q\n methodology to augment results. Supplementing social media research\n with Q methodology could be empowering and provide opportunities for\n further research and debate.","PeriodicalId":38532,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Augmenting Social Media Research with Q Methodology: Some\\n Guiding Principles\",\"authors\":\"Charmaine du Plessis\",\"doi\":\"10.34190/jbrm.17.3.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper proposes that social media studies could be\\n complemented with Q methodology when a topic that plays out in\\n social media is complex, controversial or sensitive to allow for\\n deep‑seated, integrated online and off‑line perspectives. Although\\n the Fourth Industrial Revolution brought researchers more\\n opportunities and advantages to study topics that were previously\\n inaccessible, using technologies for research does not come without\\n challenges. This is especially the case with social media studies\\n comprising large datasets and where it is not always possible to\\n identify fake profiles, bots, spam or manipulated information\\n without having access to advanced data analysis software. Another\\n point is that views expressed in social media do not always\\n represent offline perspectives. However, while Q methodology has,\\n over the years, adapted its techniques to accommodate new\\n technologies, more can be done to embrace a web 2.0 environment. Why\\n and how social media studies could be augmented with Q methodology\\n to reveal individuals’ perspectives and attitudes about topics will\\n be examined and potential difficulties will be highlighted. Not yet\\n a mainstream method, Q methodology combines the strengths of two\\n robust qualitative and quantitative methods sequentially to reveal\\n and isolate the subjective perspectives of groups of participants.\\n This methodology could, therefore, be useful when a social media\\n study puts forward novel ideas and findings that should be supported\\n by offline views. In this regard, the paper provides some guidelines\\n by referring to the five phases of a Q study and describing how a\\n social media study could not only benefit from but also apply Q\\n methodology to augment results. Supplementing social media research\\n with Q methodology could be empowering and provide opportunities for\\n further research and debate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38532,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34190/jbrm.17.3.005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Business, Management and Accounting\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34190/jbrm.17.3.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
Augmenting Social Media Research with Q Methodology: Some
Guiding Principles
This paper proposes that social media studies could be
complemented with Q methodology when a topic that plays out in
social media is complex, controversial or sensitive to allow for
deep‑seated, integrated online and off‑line perspectives. Although
the Fourth Industrial Revolution brought researchers more
opportunities and advantages to study topics that were previously
inaccessible, using technologies for research does not come without
challenges. This is especially the case with social media studies
comprising large datasets and where it is not always possible to
identify fake profiles, bots, spam or manipulated information
without having access to advanced data analysis software. Another
point is that views expressed in social media do not always
represent offline perspectives. However, while Q methodology has,
over the years, adapted its techniques to accommodate new
technologies, more can be done to embrace a web 2.0 environment. Why
and how social media studies could be augmented with Q methodology
to reveal individuals’ perspectives and attitudes about topics will
be examined and potential difficulties will be highlighted. Not yet
a mainstream method, Q methodology combines the strengths of two
robust qualitative and quantitative methods sequentially to reveal
and isolate the subjective perspectives of groups of participants.
This methodology could, therefore, be useful when a social media
study puts forward novel ideas and findings that should be supported
by offline views. In this regard, the paper provides some guidelines
by referring to the five phases of a Q study and describing how a
social media study could not only benefit from but also apply Q
methodology to augment results. Supplementing social media research
with Q methodology could be empowering and provide opportunities for
further research and debate.
期刊介绍:
The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods (EJBRM) provides perspectives on topics relevant to research methods applied in the field of business and management. Through its publication the journal contributes to the development of theory and practice. The journal accepts academically robust papers that contribute to the area of research methods applied in business and management research. Papers submitted to the journal are double-blind reviewed by members of the reviewer committee or other suitably qualified readers. The Editor reserves the right to reject papers that, in the view of the editorial board, are either of insufficient quality, or are not relevant enough to the subject area. The editor is happy to discuss contributions before submission. The journal publishes work in the categories described below. Research Papers: These may be qualitative or quantitative, empirical or theoretical in nature and can discuss completed research findings or work in progress. Case Studies: Case studies are welcomed illustrating business and management research methods in practise. View Points: View points are less academically rigorous articles usually in areas of controversy which will fuel some interesting debate. Conference Reports and Book Reviews: Anyone who attends a conference or reads a book that they feel contributes to the area of Business Research Methods is encouraged to submit a review for publication.