{"title":"衰老的心理学。","authors":"J. Birren","doi":"10.2307/2948683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Developmental psychology has investi-gated a multitude of developmentalphenomena in different phases of thelife span and in multiple domains offunctioning. However, the resultingknowledge about human development ingeneral and aging in particular continuesto be fragmented, with relatively littleconnection across disparate strands ofresearch and different research traditions(Baltes,Lindenberger,Staudinger,inpress;Magnusson, 1996). Informed by work ofothers (e.g., Baltes, 1997; Freund & Baltes,2000; Marsiske et al., 1995), a centralobjective of this chapter is to use theconceptual framework of selection, opti-mization, and compensation (SOC; Baltes& Baltes, 1990) as a tool for integratingresearch on adaptive resource allocationin life span development. In addition, wepropose that the SOC framework helpsopen up promising research directions,especially if attempts are made to studythe interplay of SOC mechanisms from adynamic systems perspective.In line with the scope of the SOCframework, the general approach takenin this chapter is inherently life spandevelopmental(e.g.,Baltes etal.,inpress).Our specific focus, however, is on lateradulthood and old age. We start byintroducing prominent contemporaryconceptual frameworks of developmentalregulation. In this context, we commenton the benefits and limitations of theresource metaphor for studying develop-mental regulation, given that resource-allocation mechanisms play a prominentrole in all considered frameworks. Thenwe describe the SOC framework in moredetail and conclude that this frameworkmayserveasaheuristictoolforarrivingata more integrated picture of human devel-opment and aging. We elaborate thisclaim in two major ways. First, we makeuse ofSOC to integrate evidence ofa greatvariety of different resource allocationprocesses. Here, we selectively reviewconceptual approaches and recent empiri-cal findings in two research domains:(a) motivational–volitional processes and(b) cognitive–sensorimotor functioning.","PeriodicalId":78356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health and human behavior","volume":"336 2 1","pages":"65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1966-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"196","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The psychology of aging.\",\"authors\":\"J. Birren\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/2948683\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Developmental psychology has investi-gated a multitude of developmentalphenomena in different phases of thelife span and in multiple domains offunctioning. However, the resultingknowledge about human development ingeneral and aging in particular continuesto be fragmented, with relatively littleconnection across disparate strands ofresearch and different research traditions(Baltes,Lindenberger,Staudinger,inpress;Magnusson, 1996). Informed by work ofothers (e.g., Baltes, 1997; Freund & Baltes,2000; Marsiske et al., 1995), a centralobjective of this chapter is to use theconceptual framework of selection, opti-mization, and compensation (SOC; Baltes& Baltes, 1990) as a tool for integratingresearch on adaptive resource allocationin life span development. In addition, wepropose that the SOC framework helpsopen up promising research directions,especially if attempts are made to studythe interplay of SOC mechanisms from adynamic systems perspective.In line with the scope of the SOCframework, the general approach takenin this chapter is inherently life spandevelopmental(e.g.,Baltes etal.,inpress).Our specific focus, however, is on lateradulthood and old age. We start byintroducing prominent contemporaryconceptual frameworks of developmentalregulation. In this context, we commenton the benefits and limitations of theresource metaphor for studying develop-mental regulation, given that resource-allocation mechanisms play a prominentrole in all considered frameworks. Thenwe describe the SOC framework in moredetail and conclude that this frameworkmayserveasaheuristictoolforarrivingata more integrated picture of human devel-opment and aging. We elaborate thisclaim in two major ways. First, we makeuse ofSOC to integrate evidence ofa greatvariety of different resource allocationprocesses. Here, we selectively reviewconceptual approaches and recent empiri-cal findings in two research domains:(a) motivational–volitional processes and(b) cognitive–sensorimotor functioning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":78356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of health and human behavior\",\"volume\":\"336 2 1\",\"pages\":\"65\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1966-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"196\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of health and human behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/2948683\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of health and human behavior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/2948683","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 196
摘要
发展心理学研究了生命不同阶段和多个功能领域的大量发展现象。然而,由此产生的关于人类发展和衰老的知识仍然是碎片化的,不同研究领域和不同研究传统之间的联系相对较少(Baltes,Lindenberger,Staudinger,inpress;Magnusson, 1996)。参考其他人的工作(例如,Baltes, 1997;Freund & Baltes,2000;Marsiske et al., 1995),本章的一个中心目标是使用选择、优化和补偿(SOC;baltes&baltes, 1990)作为整合生命周期发展中适应性资源配置研究的工具。此外,我们认为SOC框架有助于开辟有前景的研究方向,特别是如果尝试从动态系统的角度研究SOC机制的相互作用。与社会科学框架的范围一致,本章中采用的一般方法本质上是生命周期发育(例如;、Baltes等等。inpress)。然而,我们的具体重点是后期和老年。我们首先介绍当代发展调控的重要概念框架。在此背景下,鉴于资源分配机制在所有考虑的框架中发挥着突出作用,我们评论了资源隐喻在研究发展调节方面的好处和局限性。然后,我们更详细地描述了SOC框架,并得出结论,该框架可以作为一种启发式工具,以获得人类发展和衰老的更完整的图景。我们从两个主要方面阐述这一主张。首先,我们利用soc来整合各种不同资源分配过程的证据。在这里,我们选择性地回顾了两个研究领域的概念方法和最近的实证发现:(a)动机-意志过程和(b)认知-感觉运动功能。
Developmental psychology has investi-gated a multitude of developmentalphenomena in different phases of thelife span and in multiple domains offunctioning. However, the resultingknowledge about human development ingeneral and aging in particular continuesto be fragmented, with relatively littleconnection across disparate strands ofresearch and different research traditions(Baltes,Lindenberger,Staudinger,inpress;Magnusson, 1996). Informed by work ofothers (e.g., Baltes, 1997; Freund & Baltes,2000; Marsiske et al., 1995), a centralobjective of this chapter is to use theconceptual framework of selection, opti-mization, and compensation (SOC; Baltes& Baltes, 1990) as a tool for integratingresearch on adaptive resource allocationin life span development. In addition, wepropose that the SOC framework helpsopen up promising research directions,especially if attempts are made to studythe interplay of SOC mechanisms from adynamic systems perspective.In line with the scope of the SOCframework, the general approach takenin this chapter is inherently life spandevelopmental(e.g.,Baltes etal.,inpress).Our specific focus, however, is on lateradulthood and old age. We start byintroducing prominent contemporaryconceptual frameworks of developmentalregulation. In this context, we commenton the benefits and limitations of theresource metaphor for studying develop-mental regulation, given that resource-allocation mechanisms play a prominentrole in all considered frameworks. Thenwe describe the SOC framework in moredetail and conclude that this frameworkmayserveasaheuristictoolforarrivingata more integrated picture of human devel-opment and aging. We elaborate thisclaim in two major ways. First, we makeuse ofSOC to integrate evidence ofa greatvariety of different resource allocationprocesses. Here, we selectively reviewconceptual approaches and recent empiri-cal findings in two research domains:(a) motivational–volitional processes and(b) cognitive–sensorimotor functioning.