“在空中行走”背后的“更好的判断”:希尼对毕晓普的生产性误读

IF 0.1 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE
Christopher Laverty
{"title":"“在空中行走”背后的“更好的判断”:希尼对毕晓普的生产性误读","authors":"Christopher Laverty","doi":"10.1215/0041462X-8912273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This essay examines the influence of Elizabeth Bishop on Seamus Heaney's poetics in the 1980s and 1990s as he became a global poet. She stands as a unique and overlooked exemplar in Heaney's poetic pantheon. His reading of Bishop's work, for all its limitations, nonetheless enables some of his most celebrated poetry of \"home.\" Since the 1990s, Bishop's reputation has grown considerably, and recent critical assessments of newly published work have led to new ways of reading her older collections, so that the \"reticence\" for which she was famed now appears less as an aesthetic principle—as Heaney understands it—than as a concession to a repressive environment. Through intertextual close-readings alongside an examination of Heaney's literarycritical responses to her work, this essay argues Heaney's view of Bishop is often refracted through the lens of his own concerns. Ultimately, however, that view helps Heaney develop a poetics where form itself—the essential border-making and border-crossing apparatus—is emblematic of a solution to political crisis, making his misreading a highly productive one.","PeriodicalId":44252,"journal":{"name":"TWENTIETH CENTURY LITERATURE","volume":"150 1","pages":"57 - 74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The \\\"Better Judgement\\\" behind the \\\"Walk on Air\\\": Heaney's Productive Misreading of Bishop\",\"authors\":\"Christopher Laverty\",\"doi\":\"10.1215/0041462X-8912273\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This essay examines the influence of Elizabeth Bishop on Seamus Heaney's poetics in the 1980s and 1990s as he became a global poet. She stands as a unique and overlooked exemplar in Heaney's poetic pantheon. His reading of Bishop's work, for all its limitations, nonetheless enables some of his most celebrated poetry of \\\"home.\\\" Since the 1990s, Bishop's reputation has grown considerably, and recent critical assessments of newly published work have led to new ways of reading her older collections, so that the \\\"reticence\\\" for which she was famed now appears less as an aesthetic principle—as Heaney understands it—than as a concession to a repressive environment. Through intertextual close-readings alongside an examination of Heaney's literarycritical responses to her work, this essay argues Heaney's view of Bishop is often refracted through the lens of his own concerns. Ultimately, however, that view helps Heaney develop a poetics where form itself—the essential border-making and border-crossing apparatus—is emblematic of a solution to political crisis, making his misreading a highly productive one.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44252,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"TWENTIETH CENTURY LITERATURE\",\"volume\":\"150 1\",\"pages\":\"57 - 74\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"TWENTIETH CENTURY LITERATURE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1215/0041462X-8912273\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TWENTIETH CENTURY LITERATURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/0041462X-8912273","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文考察了伊丽莎白·毕晓普对希尼在上世纪八九十年代成为全球诗人的诗学思想的影响。在希尼的诗坛中,她是一个独特而又被忽视的典范。他对毕晓普作品的阅读,尽管有其局限性,但仍然使他的一些最著名的诗歌“家”得以实现。自20世纪90年代以来,毕晓普的声誉得到了相当大的提升,最近对新出版作品的批判性评估导致了阅读她的旧作品集的新方法,因此,她因“沉默”而闻名的现在看来,与其说是一种美学原则——正如希尼所理解的那样——不如说是对压抑环境的让步。通过互文细读,以及希尼对其作品的文学批评回应的考察,本文认为希尼对毕晓普的看法往往是通过他自己的关注折射出来的。然而,这种观点最终帮助希尼发展了一种诗学,在这种诗学中,形式本身——基本的边界划定和跨越边界的工具——是政治危机解决方案的象征,使他的误读成为一种卓有成效的误读。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The "Better Judgement" behind the "Walk on Air": Heaney's Productive Misreading of Bishop
Abstract:This essay examines the influence of Elizabeth Bishop on Seamus Heaney's poetics in the 1980s and 1990s as he became a global poet. She stands as a unique and overlooked exemplar in Heaney's poetic pantheon. His reading of Bishop's work, for all its limitations, nonetheless enables some of his most celebrated poetry of "home." Since the 1990s, Bishop's reputation has grown considerably, and recent critical assessments of newly published work have led to new ways of reading her older collections, so that the "reticence" for which she was famed now appears less as an aesthetic principle—as Heaney understands it—than as a concession to a repressive environment. Through intertextual close-readings alongside an examination of Heaney's literarycritical responses to her work, this essay argues Heaney's view of Bishop is often refracted through the lens of his own concerns. Ultimately, however, that view helps Heaney develop a poetics where form itself—the essential border-making and border-crossing apparatus—is emblematic of a solution to political crisis, making his misreading a highly productive one.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信