减少燃料处理的收割机-货代和收割机-堆场系统

Q3 Engineering

European Journal of Forest Engineering Pub Date : 2001-01-01 DOI:10.1080/08435243.2001.10702766

E. S. Drews, B. Hartsough, J. A. Doyal, L. Kellogg

{"title":"减少燃料处理的收割机-货代和收割机-堆场系统","authors":"E. S. Drews, B. Hartsough, J. A. Doyal, L. Kellogg","doi":"10.1080/08435243.2001.10702766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Two harvesting systems were compared for reducing fuel loadings in overstocked conifer stands in eastern Oregon; forest managers also set a high priority on minimizing soil disturbance. Both employed cut-to-length (CTL) harvesters; one used a forwarder and the other a small skyline yarder. Both systems produced very similar and acceptable results in terms of fuels reduction and soil disturbance, but at different stump-to-mill costs: $46/green ton for the forwarder system versus $80/green ton for the yarder system.","PeriodicalId":36173,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Forest Engineering","volume":"24 1","pages":"81 - 91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Harvester-Forwarder and Harvester-Yarder Systems for Fuel Reduction Treatments\",\"authors\":\"E. S. Drews, B. Hartsough, J. A. Doyal, L. Kellogg\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08435243.2001.10702766\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Two harvesting systems were compared for reducing fuel loadings in overstocked conifer stands in eastern Oregon; forest managers also set a high priority on minimizing soil disturbance. Both employed cut-to-length (CTL) harvesters; one used a forwarder and the other a small skyline yarder. Both systems produced very similar and acceptable results in terms of fuels reduction and soil disturbance, but at different stump-to-mill costs: $46/green ton for the forwarder system versus $80/green ton for the yarder system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36173,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Forest Engineering\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"81 - 91\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Forest Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08435243.2001.10702766\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Forest Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08435243.2001.10702766","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 17

摘要

比较了两种采伐系统在减少俄勒冈东部过剩针叶林燃料负荷方面的效果;森林管理者也高度重视减少土壤干扰。两者都采用切割长度(CTL)收割机;一个是货代，另一个是小型天际线货场。两种系统在减少燃料和土壤干扰方面产生了非常相似和可接受的结果，但从树桩到工厂的成本不同:货运系统为46美元/绿色吨，而堆场系统为80美元/绿色吨。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Harvester-Forwarder and Harvester-Yarder Systems for Fuel Reduction Treatments

Abstract Two harvesting systems were compared for reducing fuel loadings in overstocked conifer stands in eastern Oregon; forest managers also set a high priority on minimizing soil disturbance. Both employed cut-to-length (CTL) harvesters; one used a forwarder and the other a small skyline yarder. Both systems produced very similar and acceptable results in terms of fuels reduction and soil disturbance, but at different stump-to-mill costs: $46/green ton for the forwarder system versus $80/green ton for the yarder system.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

European Journal of Forest Engineering Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Forestry

CiteScore

1.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量