吹扫和回收试验在地面气体通量风险评估中的应用

A. Nwachukwu, N. Eluwa, C. Uwa, N. Nwachukwu
{"title":"吹扫和回收试验在地面气体通量风险评估中的应用","authors":"A. Nwachukwu, N. Eluwa, C. Uwa, N. Nwachukwu","doi":"10.21608/CAT.2020.27371.1050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purge and recovery testing is a novel method for measuring ground-gas flux. This method has been tested with Gasclam in boreholes at two landfill sites. The recovery rate of individual gases was used to predict when and at what concentration they would reach the unmonitored receptors. For example, at site 1 in borehole 2, CH4 and CO2 had concentrations of 22 % and 4 % respectively before purging in September 2010 and, 23 % and 4.4 % respectively in May 2011 before purging. While 22 % of CH4 and 4 % of CO2 were recovered in 32 hrs and 14 hrs respectively after purging, 23 % of CH4 and 4.4 % of CO2 were recovered in 52 hrs and 27 hrs respectively after purging. This implies that CH4 and CO2 concentrations recovery in this borehole was faster in September 2010 than in May 2011. The recovery time of the investigated gases [CH4, CO2 and Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)] varied from the length of site visit to over a day. It also varied with season and site. Soil permeability and gas production rate are suspected to be responsible for variations in gas recharge rate. In general, the recovery profiles of VOC were very different from those of CH4 and CO2. VOC tended to recover in no time, indicating that they could get to the receptor much faster compared to other gases, thereby posing more danger. The reproducibility of the gases was not consistent due to their low concentrations.","PeriodicalId":14445,"journal":{"name":"International Journal on Environmental Sciences","volume":"334 1","pages":"11-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Utility of Purge and Recovery Testing in Ground-Gas Flux Risk Assessment\",\"authors\":\"A. Nwachukwu, N. Eluwa, C. Uwa, N. Nwachukwu\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/CAT.2020.27371.1050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purge and recovery testing is a novel method for measuring ground-gas flux. This method has been tested with Gasclam in boreholes at two landfill sites. The recovery rate of individual gases was used to predict when and at what concentration they would reach the unmonitored receptors. For example, at site 1 in borehole 2, CH4 and CO2 had concentrations of 22 % and 4 % respectively before purging in September 2010 and, 23 % and 4.4 % respectively in May 2011 before purging. While 22 % of CH4 and 4 % of CO2 were recovered in 32 hrs and 14 hrs respectively after purging, 23 % of CH4 and 4.4 % of CO2 were recovered in 52 hrs and 27 hrs respectively after purging. This implies that CH4 and CO2 concentrations recovery in this borehole was faster in September 2010 than in May 2011. The recovery time of the investigated gases [CH4, CO2 and Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)] varied from the length of site visit to over a day. It also varied with season and site. Soil permeability and gas production rate are suspected to be responsible for variations in gas recharge rate. In general, the recovery profiles of VOC were very different from those of CH4 and CO2. VOC tended to recover in no time, indicating that they could get to the receptor much faster compared to other gases, thereby posing more danger. The reproducibility of the gases was not consistent due to their low concentrations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14445,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal on Environmental Sciences\",\"volume\":\"334 1\",\"pages\":\"11-18\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal on Environmental Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/CAT.2020.27371.1050\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal on Environmental Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/CAT.2020.27371.1050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

吹扫回收试验是一种测量地面气体通量的新方法。该方法已在两个垃圾填埋场的钻孔中用Gasclam进行了测试。单个气体的回收率被用来预测它们何时以何种浓度到达未监测的受体。例如,2010年9月吹扫前,井眼2站点1的CH4和CO2浓度分别为22%和4%,2011年5月吹扫前,CH4和CO2浓度分别为23%和4.4%。在吹扫后32小时和14小时内分别回收了22%的CH4和4%的CO2,在吹扫后52小时和27小时内分别回收了23%的CH4和4.4%的CO2。这表明2010年9月该井CH4和CO2浓度的恢复速度要快于2011年5月。所研究气体[CH4, CO2和挥发性有机化合物(VOC)]的回收时间从现场访问的长度到一天以上不等。它也随季节和地点而变化。土壤渗透性和产气速率被怀疑是天然气补给速率变化的原因。总的来说,VOC的回收率与CH4和CO2的回收率有很大的不同。挥发性有机化合物往往会在短时间内恢复,这表明与其他气体相比,它们可以更快地到达受体,从而造成更大的危险。由于气体浓度低,重现性不一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Utility of Purge and Recovery Testing in Ground-Gas Flux Risk Assessment
Purge and recovery testing is a novel method for measuring ground-gas flux. This method has been tested with Gasclam in boreholes at two landfill sites. The recovery rate of individual gases was used to predict when and at what concentration they would reach the unmonitored receptors. For example, at site 1 in borehole 2, CH4 and CO2 had concentrations of 22 % and 4 % respectively before purging in September 2010 and, 23 % and 4.4 % respectively in May 2011 before purging. While 22 % of CH4 and 4 % of CO2 were recovered in 32 hrs and 14 hrs respectively after purging, 23 % of CH4 and 4.4 % of CO2 were recovered in 52 hrs and 27 hrs respectively after purging. This implies that CH4 and CO2 concentrations recovery in this borehole was faster in September 2010 than in May 2011. The recovery time of the investigated gases [CH4, CO2 and Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)] varied from the length of site visit to over a day. It also varied with season and site. Soil permeability and gas production rate are suspected to be responsible for variations in gas recharge rate. In general, the recovery profiles of VOC were very different from those of CH4 and CO2. VOC tended to recover in no time, indicating that they could get to the receptor much faster compared to other gases, thereby posing more danger. The reproducibility of the gases was not consistent due to their low concentrations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信