《人权和基本自由公约》在行政诉讼中的适用以及欧洲人权法院的判例

O. Hrytsaienko
{"title":"《人权和基本自由公约》在行政诉讼中的适用以及欧洲人权法院的判例","authors":"O. Hrytsaienko","doi":"10.17721/2227-796x.2021.4.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this article is to certificate the legal nature of the decisions of the European Courtof Human Rights (starting now referred to as the ECHR), to determine the place of the Conventionon Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (starting now referred to as the Convention) inthe hierarchy of the rule of law, research and elaboration of theoretical and practical provisionson the application of the Convention and the case-law of the ECHR by administrative courts.The author devoted particular attention to exploring the issue of application of provisions of theConvention and the jurisprudence of the ECHR in law enforcement.To achieve the set goals, the content of the Convention and the legislation of Ukraine as the legalbasis for guaranteeing and protecting the rights and freedoms of the individual in the sphereof public legal relations has been analyzed, and theoretical approaches to understanding keyconventional concepts, categories and principles have been elucidated. In addition, the author hasdefined the objectives of the ECHR and the role of the Court’s jurisprudence in law enforcementin Ukraine.The methodological basis of the research became general scientific and uniquelegal methodsto reach knowledge. In particular,scientificlearning methods such as analysis, description,comparison were used. The content of certain concepts had been clarified through a formallogicalapproach,and a comparative legal method had been used in the research of the applicationof the Convention by different States parties.The study found that the case-law of the ECHRtowards Ukraine demonstrated the need for an urgentchange in law enforcement practice and unconditional compliance and application by courts ofthe provisions of the Convention and court decisions of the ECHR. To guarantee the constitutionalright of a person to protection against unlawful decisions, actions or inaction of state bodies and to ensure the right of a person to a fair court during the execution of administrative proceedings,the Convention principles of judicial activity shall be subject to mandatory application, as wellas the Unified requirements of the right of interference in the person’s right.The legislator shouldenshrine these provisions in a procedural law – the Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine.The author concluded that ensuring the proper application by the state of the requirements of theConvention and the practice of the ECHR by the administrative Court would guarantee not onlythe implementation of the Convention rights of the individual but also adequate protection of therights and freedoms of the person from unlawful decisions, actions (inaction) of the subjects ofpower in the sphere of public-legal relations.","PeriodicalId":7222,"journal":{"name":"Administrative law and process","volume":"78 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"APPLICATION OF THE CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS AND THE JURISPRUDENCE OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS\",\"authors\":\"O. Hrytsaienko\",\"doi\":\"10.17721/2227-796x.2021.4.02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objective of this article is to certificate the legal nature of the decisions of the European Courtof Human Rights (starting now referred to as the ECHR), to determine the place of the Conventionon Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (starting now referred to as the Convention) inthe hierarchy of the rule of law, research and elaboration of theoretical and practical provisionson the application of the Convention and the case-law of the ECHR by administrative courts.The author devoted particular attention to exploring the issue of application of provisions of theConvention and the jurisprudence of the ECHR in law enforcement.To achieve the set goals, the content of the Convention and the legislation of Ukraine as the legalbasis for guaranteeing and protecting the rights and freedoms of the individual in the sphereof public legal relations has been analyzed, and theoretical approaches to understanding keyconventional concepts, categories and principles have been elucidated. In addition, the author hasdefined the objectives of the ECHR and the role of the Court’s jurisprudence in law enforcementin Ukraine.The methodological basis of the research became general scientific and uniquelegal methodsto reach knowledge. In particular,scientificlearning methods such as analysis, description,comparison were used. The content of certain concepts had been clarified through a formallogicalapproach,and a comparative legal method had been used in the research of the applicationof the Convention by different States parties.The study found that the case-law of the ECHRtowards Ukraine demonstrated the need for an urgentchange in law enforcement practice and unconditional compliance and application by courts ofthe provisions of the Convention and court decisions of the ECHR. To guarantee the constitutionalright of a person to protection against unlawful decisions, actions or inaction of state bodies and to ensure the right of a person to a fair court during the execution of administrative proceedings,the Convention principles of judicial activity shall be subject to mandatory application, as wellas the Unified requirements of the right of interference in the person’s right.The legislator shouldenshrine these provisions in a procedural law – the Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine.The author concluded that ensuring the proper application by the state of the requirements of theConvention and the practice of the ECHR by the administrative Court would guarantee not onlythe implementation of the Convention rights of the individual but also adequate protection of therights and freedoms of the person from unlawful decisions, actions (inaction) of the subjects ofpower in the sphere of public-legal relations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7222,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Administrative law and process\",\"volume\":\"78 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Administrative law and process\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17721/2227-796x.2021.4.02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administrative law and process","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17721/2227-796x.2021.4.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是证明欧洲人权法院(现称欧洲人权法院)判决的法律性质,确定《人权与基本自由公约》(现称《公约》)在法治体系中的地位,研究和阐述行政法院适用《公约》和《欧洲人权法院》判例法的理论和实践规定。作者特别关注探讨《公约》条款的适用问题和《欧洲人权公约》在执法中的判例。为实现既定目标,本文分析了《公约》的内容以及乌克兰作为在公共法律关系领域保障和保护个人权利和自由的法律基础的立法,并阐明了理解关键常规概念、类别和原则的理论途径。此外,作者还界定了《欧洲人权公约》的目标和法院的法理学在乌克兰执法中的作用。研究的方法论基础成为普遍的科学的和独特的法律方法来获得知识。特别是运用了分析、描述、比较等科学的学习方法。某些概念的内容已通过形式方法加以澄清,并在研究不同缔约国对《公约》的适用情况时使用了比较法方法。研究发现,欧洲人权公约对乌克兰的判例法表明,迫切需要改变执法实践,并要求法院无条件遵守和适用《公约》的规定和欧洲人权公约的法院判决。为保障个人免受国家机关非法决定、行为或不作为侵害的宪法权利,保障个人在行政诉讼执行过程中诉诸公正法院的权利,应当强制适用《公约》关于司法活动的原则,以及对个人权利的干涉权的统一要求。立法者应将这些规定纳入程序法- -乌克兰行政程序法。作者的结论是,确保国家适当适用《公约》的要求和行政法院对《欧洲人权公约》的实践,不仅可以保证个人执行《公约》的权利,而且还可以充分保护个人的权利和自由,使其免受公共法律关系领域权力主体的非法决定、行动(不作为)的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
APPLICATION OF THE CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS AND THE JURISPRUDENCE OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS
The objective of this article is to certificate the legal nature of the decisions of the European Courtof Human Rights (starting now referred to as the ECHR), to determine the place of the Conventionon Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (starting now referred to as the Convention) inthe hierarchy of the rule of law, research and elaboration of theoretical and practical provisionson the application of the Convention and the case-law of the ECHR by administrative courts.The author devoted particular attention to exploring the issue of application of provisions of theConvention and the jurisprudence of the ECHR in law enforcement.To achieve the set goals, the content of the Convention and the legislation of Ukraine as the legalbasis for guaranteeing and protecting the rights and freedoms of the individual in the sphereof public legal relations has been analyzed, and theoretical approaches to understanding keyconventional concepts, categories and principles have been elucidated. In addition, the author hasdefined the objectives of the ECHR and the role of the Court’s jurisprudence in law enforcementin Ukraine.The methodological basis of the research became general scientific and uniquelegal methodsto reach knowledge. In particular,scientificlearning methods such as analysis, description,comparison were used. The content of certain concepts had been clarified through a formallogicalapproach,and a comparative legal method had been used in the research of the applicationof the Convention by different States parties.The study found that the case-law of the ECHRtowards Ukraine demonstrated the need for an urgentchange in law enforcement practice and unconditional compliance and application by courts ofthe provisions of the Convention and court decisions of the ECHR. To guarantee the constitutionalright of a person to protection against unlawful decisions, actions or inaction of state bodies and to ensure the right of a person to a fair court during the execution of administrative proceedings,the Convention principles of judicial activity shall be subject to mandatory application, as wellas the Unified requirements of the right of interference in the person’s right.The legislator shouldenshrine these provisions in a procedural law – the Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine.The author concluded that ensuring the proper application by the state of the requirements of theConvention and the practice of the ECHR by the administrative Court would guarantee not onlythe implementation of the Convention rights of the individual but also adequate protection of therights and freedoms of the person from unlawful decisions, actions (inaction) of the subjects ofpower in the sphere of public-legal relations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信