欧洲合同法的原则:自治的商业法还是普遍的商业法的一部分?

Q4 Social Sciences
Zeeshan Mansoor
{"title":"欧洲合同法的原则:自治的商业法还是普遍的商业法的一部分?","authors":"Zeeshan Mansoor","doi":"10.1504/IJPL.2013.050526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Commission on European contract law contends that the principles of European contract law are a source of European lex mercatoria. The concept of lex mercatoria itself, however, is still ambiguous. This paper analyses the current academic opinion on the nature of lex mercatoria and provides a more practical definition which focuses on the role of the arbitrator and better clarifies this confusing system of law. It further explains how the PECL, like any other set of principles developed to regulate international trade, form a part of the universal lex mercatoria.","PeriodicalId":39023,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Private Law","volume":"134 1","pages":"24-37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Principles of European contract law: an autonomous lex mercatoria or part of a universal lex mercatoria?\",\"authors\":\"Zeeshan Mansoor\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/IJPL.2013.050526\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Commission on European contract law contends that the principles of European contract law are a source of European lex mercatoria. The concept of lex mercatoria itself, however, is still ambiguous. This paper analyses the current academic opinion on the nature of lex mercatoria and provides a more practical definition which focuses on the role of the arbitrator and better clarifies this confusing system of law. It further explains how the PECL, like any other set of principles developed to regulate international trade, form a part of the universal lex mercatoria.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39023,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Private Law\",\"volume\":\"134 1\",\"pages\":\"24-37\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Private Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPL.2013.050526\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Private Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPL.2013.050526","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

欧洲合同法委员会认为,欧洲合同法的原则是欧洲商业法的来源。然而,商事法本身的概念仍然是模糊的。本文分析了目前学术界对商事法性质的看法,并提出了一个更实用的定义,该定义侧重于仲裁员的作用,更好地澄清了这一令人困惑的法律制度。它进一步解释了PECL如何像其他为规范国际贸易而制定的一套原则一样,构成普遍贸易法的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Principles of European contract law: an autonomous lex mercatoria or part of a universal lex mercatoria?
The Commission on European contract law contends that the principles of European contract law are a source of European lex mercatoria. The concept of lex mercatoria itself, however, is still ambiguous. This paper analyses the current academic opinion on the nature of lex mercatoria and provides a more practical definition which focuses on the role of the arbitrator and better clarifies this confusing system of law. It further explains how the PECL, like any other set of principles developed to regulate international trade, form a part of the universal lex mercatoria.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信