重新构建缺陷思维、微侵犯和教师蔑视观念之间的联系

Q2 Social Sciences
Timberly L. Baker
{"title":"重新构建缺陷思维、微侵犯和教师蔑视观念之间的联系","authors":"Timberly L. Baker","doi":"10.7709/jnegroeducation.88.2.0103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:African American students are being suspended/expelled at a greater rate than their peers, a phenomenon that scholars have come to call the “discipline gap.” As the gap has grown, so have instances of African American student suspension and expulsion for “defiance.” This article offers a revision of the Baker framework, which troubles deficit notions of overrepresentation in the disciplinary category of defiance by offering a different conceptualization of African American students being labeled defiant. The author argues that the very acts classified as defiant are often a response to microaggressions. A framework is presented to explain why African American students are overrepresented in terms of suspension/expulsion for defiance.","PeriodicalId":39914,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Negro Education","volume":"55 1","pages":"103 - 113"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reframing the Connections between Deficit Thinking, Microaggressions, and Teacher Perceptions of Defiance\",\"authors\":\"Timberly L. Baker\",\"doi\":\"10.7709/jnegroeducation.88.2.0103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:African American students are being suspended/expelled at a greater rate than their peers, a phenomenon that scholars have come to call the “discipline gap.” As the gap has grown, so have instances of African American student suspension and expulsion for “defiance.” This article offers a revision of the Baker framework, which troubles deficit notions of overrepresentation in the disciplinary category of defiance by offering a different conceptualization of African American students being labeled defiant. The author argues that the very acts classified as defiant are often a response to microaggressions. A framework is presented to explain why African American students are overrepresented in terms of suspension/expulsion for defiance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39914,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Negro Education\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"103 - 113\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Negro Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7709/jnegroeducation.88.2.0103\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Negro Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7709/jnegroeducation.88.2.0103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

摘要:非洲裔美国学生被停学或开除的比例高于其他学生,学者们将这种现象称为“学科差距”。随着差距的扩大,非裔美国学生因“挑衅”而被停学和开除的事例也越来越多。本文对贝克框架进行了修订,该框架通过对非裔美国学生被贴上挑衅标签的不同概念,解决了在蔑视学科类别中过度代表性的缺陷概念。作者认为,被归类为挑衅的行为往往是对微侵犯的反应。提出了一个框架来解释为什么非洲裔美国学生在因挑衅而被停学/开除方面的比例过高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reframing the Connections between Deficit Thinking, Microaggressions, and Teacher Perceptions of Defiance
Abstract:African American students are being suspended/expelled at a greater rate than their peers, a phenomenon that scholars have come to call the “discipline gap.” As the gap has grown, so have instances of African American student suspension and expulsion for “defiance.” This article offers a revision of the Baker framework, which troubles deficit notions of overrepresentation in the disciplinary category of defiance by offering a different conceptualization of African American students being labeled defiant. The author argues that the very acts classified as defiant are often a response to microaggressions. A framework is presented to explain why African American students are overrepresented in terms of suspension/expulsion for defiance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
The Journal of Negro Education
The Journal of Negro Education Social Sciences-Anthropology
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Negro Education (JNE), a refereed scholarly periodical, was founded at Howard University in 1932 to fill the need for a scholarly journal that would identify and define the problems that characterized the education of Black people in the United States and elsewhere, provide a forum for analysis and solutions, and serve as a vehicle for sharing statistics and research on a national basis. JNE sustains a commitment to a threefold mission: first, to stimulate the collection and facilitate the dissemination of facts about the education of Black people; second, to present discussions involving critical appraisals of the proposals and practices relating to the education of Black people.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信