基于综合地下表征、动态建模和监测的地下储气库过程优化-一个案例研究

Long-xin Li, Yuan Zhou, Limin Li, J. Tinnin, Xian Peng, C. Cranfield, Yu Luo, R. Guises, Yuchao Zhao, Xia Wang, F. Gui, Christopher Burns, Huijuan Yu, Ahmad Reza Younessi Sinaki
{"title":"基于综合地下表征、动态建模和监测的地下储气库过程优化-一个案例研究","authors":"Long-xin Li, Yuan Zhou, Limin Li, J. Tinnin, Xian Peng, C. Cranfield, Yu Luo, R. Guises, Yuchao Zhao, Xia Wang, F. Gui, Christopher Burns, Huijuan Yu, Ahmad Reza Younessi Sinaki","doi":"10.2118/207941-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Underground gas storage (UGS) will be key to addressing supply and demand dynamics as natural gas consumption grows during the coming decades in response to cleaner energy initiatives. The XGS facility began UGS operations in a depleted gas field located in SW China in 2013. Following this initial period of utilization, the site was reassessed to safely increase deliverability during winter months to meet future peak gas demand.\n The XGS field is located in a high tectonic stress region and has a structurally complex and highly faulted geological setting. The carbonate reservoir is heterogeneous and naturally fractured. Initial assessment steps involved determination of maximum storage capacity and estimation of required working gas and cushion gas volumes using fully integrated geological, geophysical, petrophysical frameworks. Geomechanical modeling was embedded into the analysis to determine the long-term impact inferred by cyclical variations of pressures on the reservoir performance and cap rock containment and evaluate both safe operating pressure limits and monitoring requirements.\n The coupling of complex reservoir and geomechanical parameters was required to create a dynamic model within the stress regime that could be history-matched to the early gas depletion phase and subsequent gas storage cycles. Such a holistic approach allows the operator to optimize the number of wells, their placement, trajectories and completion designs to ensure safe and efficient operations and develop strategies for increasing withdrawal rates to meet anticipated future demand. Additionally, tight integration of subsurface understanding with surface requirements, such as turbo-compressors, is critical to meet the UGS designed performance and deliverability objectives and ensure sufficient flexibility to optimize the facility usage.\n A further important task of the final phase of UGS facilities design involves enablement of sustainable operation through a Storage Optimization Plan. The results of the analyses serve as a basis for the design of this plan, in combination with fit-for-purpose surveillance systems of the reservoir and cap-rock seal recording pressure, rock deformation and seismicity in real time, along with regular wellbore inspection.","PeriodicalId":10981,"journal":{"name":"Day 4 Thu, November 18, 2021","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Underground Gas Storage Process Optimization Using Integrated Subsurface Characterization, Dynamic Modeling and Monitoring - A Case Study\",\"authors\":\"Long-xin Li, Yuan Zhou, Limin Li, J. Tinnin, Xian Peng, C. Cranfield, Yu Luo, R. Guises, Yuchao Zhao, Xia Wang, F. Gui, Christopher Burns, Huijuan Yu, Ahmad Reza Younessi Sinaki\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/207941-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Underground gas storage (UGS) will be key to addressing supply and demand dynamics as natural gas consumption grows during the coming decades in response to cleaner energy initiatives. The XGS facility began UGS operations in a depleted gas field located in SW China in 2013. Following this initial period of utilization, the site was reassessed to safely increase deliverability during winter months to meet future peak gas demand.\\n The XGS field is located in a high tectonic stress region and has a structurally complex and highly faulted geological setting. The carbonate reservoir is heterogeneous and naturally fractured. Initial assessment steps involved determination of maximum storage capacity and estimation of required working gas and cushion gas volumes using fully integrated geological, geophysical, petrophysical frameworks. Geomechanical modeling was embedded into the analysis to determine the long-term impact inferred by cyclical variations of pressures on the reservoir performance and cap rock containment and evaluate both safe operating pressure limits and monitoring requirements.\\n The coupling of complex reservoir and geomechanical parameters was required to create a dynamic model within the stress regime that could be history-matched to the early gas depletion phase and subsequent gas storage cycles. Such a holistic approach allows the operator to optimize the number of wells, their placement, trajectories and completion designs to ensure safe and efficient operations and develop strategies for increasing withdrawal rates to meet anticipated future demand. Additionally, tight integration of subsurface understanding with surface requirements, such as turbo-compressors, is critical to meet the UGS designed performance and deliverability objectives and ensure sufficient flexibility to optimize the facility usage.\\n A further important task of the final phase of UGS facilities design involves enablement of sustainable operation through a Storage Optimization Plan. The results of the analyses serve as a basis for the design of this plan, in combination with fit-for-purpose surveillance systems of the reservoir and cap-rock seal recording pressure, rock deformation and seismicity in real time, along with regular wellbore inspection.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10981,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 4 Thu, November 18, 2021\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 4 Thu, November 18, 2021\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/207941-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 4 Thu, November 18, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/207941-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着未来几十年天然气消费量的增长,为响应清洁能源倡议,地下储气库(UGS)将成为解决供需动态的关键。2013年,XGS在中国西南部的一个废弃气田开始了UGS作业。在最初的利用期结束后,对该基地进行了重新评估,以安全提高冬季的产能,以满足未来的天然气峰值需求。XGS油田位于高构造应力场区,具有构造复杂、高断裂的地质背景。碳酸盐岩储层具有非均质性和天然裂缝性。最初的评估步骤包括确定最大储存容量,并利用全面综合的地质、地球物理、岩石物理框架估计所需的工作气体和缓冲气体体积。地质力学建模嵌入到分析中,以确定压力周期性变化对储层性能和盖层安全壳的长期影响,并评估安全操作压力极限和监测要求。复杂储层和地质力学参数的耦合需要在应力状态下创建一个动态模型,该模型可以与早期天然气枯竭阶段和随后的天然气储存循环进行历史匹配。这种全面的方法使作业者能够优化井的数量、位置、轨迹和完井设计,以确保安全高效的作业,并制定提高采出率的策略,以满足预期的未来需求。此外,将地下理解与地面需求(如涡轮压缩机)紧密结合,对于满足UGS设计的性能和可交付性目标至关重要,并确保足够的灵活性,以优化设施的使用。UGS设施设计最后阶段的另一项重要任务是通过存储优化计划实现可持续运行。分析结果可作为该方案设计的基础,结合适合用途的储层和盖层密封监测系统,实时记录压力、岩石变形和地震活动,并定期进行井筒检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Underground Gas Storage Process Optimization Using Integrated Subsurface Characterization, Dynamic Modeling and Monitoring - A Case Study
Underground gas storage (UGS) will be key to addressing supply and demand dynamics as natural gas consumption grows during the coming decades in response to cleaner energy initiatives. The XGS facility began UGS operations in a depleted gas field located in SW China in 2013. Following this initial period of utilization, the site was reassessed to safely increase deliverability during winter months to meet future peak gas demand. The XGS field is located in a high tectonic stress region and has a structurally complex and highly faulted geological setting. The carbonate reservoir is heterogeneous and naturally fractured. Initial assessment steps involved determination of maximum storage capacity and estimation of required working gas and cushion gas volumes using fully integrated geological, geophysical, petrophysical frameworks. Geomechanical modeling was embedded into the analysis to determine the long-term impact inferred by cyclical variations of pressures on the reservoir performance and cap rock containment and evaluate both safe operating pressure limits and monitoring requirements. The coupling of complex reservoir and geomechanical parameters was required to create a dynamic model within the stress regime that could be history-matched to the early gas depletion phase and subsequent gas storage cycles. Such a holistic approach allows the operator to optimize the number of wells, their placement, trajectories and completion designs to ensure safe and efficient operations and develop strategies for increasing withdrawal rates to meet anticipated future demand. Additionally, tight integration of subsurface understanding with surface requirements, such as turbo-compressors, is critical to meet the UGS designed performance and deliverability objectives and ensure sufficient flexibility to optimize the facility usage. A further important task of the final phase of UGS facilities design involves enablement of sustainable operation through a Storage Optimization Plan. The results of the analyses serve as a basis for the design of this plan, in combination with fit-for-purpose surveillance systems of the reservoir and cap-rock seal recording pressure, rock deformation and seismicity in real time, along with regular wellbore inspection.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信