关于火花到假辉光、辉光过渡机理和放电可探测性的讨论

M. Danikas, R. Bartnikas, J. Novak
{"title":"关于火花到假辉光、辉光过渡机理和放电可探测性的讨论","authors":"M. Danikas, R. Bartnikas, J. Novak","doi":"10.1109/14.236202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The discusser raises questions regarding the above-titled paper by R. Bartnikas and J.P. Novak (ibid., vol.27, p.3-14, 1992) as to how the authors would relate their term 'spark' to 'streamer' and 'Townsend discharges'. The discusser also questions the authors' claim that at voltages slightly above the discharge inception point, pseudoglow discharges appear, which, with further increase of the voltage, transform into glow discharges and these in turn, with an even further voltage increase, transform into spark discharges, and cites experimental work that counters this claim. The authors agree with the discusser on the need for clarification and standardization of terminology. They contest the discusser's point regarding pseudoglow discharges and provide further discussion in support of their claim. >","PeriodicalId":13105,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Electrical Insulation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the spark to pseudoglow and glow transition mechanism and discharge detectability (Discussion, wi\",\"authors\":\"M. Danikas, R. Bartnikas, J. Novak\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/14.236202\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The discusser raises questions regarding the above-titled paper by R. Bartnikas and J.P. Novak (ibid., vol.27, p.3-14, 1992) as to how the authors would relate their term 'spark' to 'streamer' and 'Townsend discharges'. The discusser also questions the authors' claim that at voltages slightly above the discharge inception point, pseudoglow discharges appear, which, with further increase of the voltage, transform into glow discharges and these in turn, with an even further voltage increase, transform into spark discharges, and cites experimental work that counters this claim. The authors agree with the discusser on the need for clarification and standardization of terminology. They contest the discusser's point regarding pseudoglow discharges and provide further discussion in support of their claim. >\",\"PeriodicalId\":13105,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Transactions on Electrical Insulation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Transactions on Electrical Insulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/14.236202\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Electrical Insulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/14.236202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

讨论者对R. Bartnikas和J.P. Novak的上述论文(同上,第27卷,第3-14页,1992年)提出了问题,即作者如何将他们的术语“火花”与“流光”和“Townsend放电”联系起来。讨论者还质疑了作者的说法,即在略高于放电起始点的电压下,会出现假辉光放电,随着电压的进一步增加,会转变为辉光放电,而这些辉光放电又会随着电压的进一步增加而转变为火花放电,并引用了实验工作来反驳这一说法。作者同意讨论者关于术语需要澄清和标准化的观点。他们对讨论者关于假辉光放电的观点提出了质疑,并提供了进一步的讨论来支持他们的主张。>
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the spark to pseudoglow and glow transition mechanism and discharge detectability (Discussion, wi
The discusser raises questions regarding the above-titled paper by R. Bartnikas and J.P. Novak (ibid., vol.27, p.3-14, 1992) as to how the authors would relate their term 'spark' to 'streamer' and 'Townsend discharges'. The discusser also questions the authors' claim that at voltages slightly above the discharge inception point, pseudoglow discharges appear, which, with further increase of the voltage, transform into glow discharges and these in turn, with an even further voltage increase, transform into spark discharges, and cites experimental work that counters this claim. The authors agree with the discusser on the need for clarification and standardization of terminology. They contest the discusser's point regarding pseudoglow discharges and provide further discussion in support of their claim. >
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信