英语写作考试中分析性评价与整体性评价的比较研究

IF 0.5 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Hao Wu
{"title":"英语写作考试中分析性评价与整体性评价的比较研究","authors":"Hao Wu","doi":"10.54475/jlt.2021.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The choice of assessment method is particularly important in English writing testing and assessment. Analytical assessment and holistic assessment are two common methods in English writing assessment. The choice of assessment method usually depends on the content and focus of the test. This paper provides a review of previous empirical studies and compares the two assessment methods in terms of reliability, construct validity, practicability, and impact, followed by suggestions in the selection, design, and operation of the assessment methods.","PeriodicalId":53931,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Language Teaching and Learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study of analytical assessment and holistic assessment in English writing tests\",\"authors\":\"Hao Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.54475/jlt.2021.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The choice of assessment method is particularly important in English writing testing and assessment. Analytical assessment and holistic assessment are two common methods in English writing assessment. The choice of assessment method usually depends on the content and focus of the test. This paper provides a review of previous empirical studies and compares the two assessment methods in terms of reliability, construct validity, practicability, and impact, followed by suggestions in the selection, design, and operation of the assessment methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53931,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Language Teaching and Learning\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Language Teaching and Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54475/jlt.2021.001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Language Teaching and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54475/jlt.2021.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在英语写作测试和评估中,评估方法的选择尤为重要。分析性评价和整体性评价是英语写作评价中常用的两种方法。评估方法的选择通常取决于考试的内容和重点。本文对以往的实证研究进行了回顾,从信度、结构效度、实用性和影响等方面对两种评估方法进行了比较,并对评估方法的选择、设计和操作提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparative study of analytical assessment and holistic assessment in English writing tests
The choice of assessment method is particularly important in English writing testing and assessment. Analytical assessment and holistic assessment are two common methods in English writing assessment. The choice of assessment method usually depends on the content and focus of the test. This paper provides a review of previous empirical studies and compares the two assessment methods in terms of reliability, construct validity, practicability, and impact, followed by suggestions in the selection, design, and operation of the assessment methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Language Teaching and Learning
Journal of Language Teaching and Learning EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信