帝汶海和解(东帝汶诉澳大利亚):关于委员会关于权限的决定的说明

IF 1.3 3区社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

Ocean Development and International Law Pub Date : 2018-06-20 DOI:10.1080/00908320.2018.1479370

Jianjun Gao

{"title":"帝汶海和解(东帝汶诉澳大利亚):关于委员会关于权限的决定的说明","authors":"Jianjun Gao","doi":"10.1080/00908320.2018.1479370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The Timor Sea Conciliation is the first experience with the compulsory conciliation under Annex V of the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. The Conciliation Commission addressed the objections to its competence as a preliminary matter and rendered a separate decision. This article examines the approach of the Conciliation Commission in dealing with its competence issues and the understandings of the Conciliation Commission as regards the relevant provisions of the 1982 Convention.","PeriodicalId":45771,"journal":{"name":"Ocean Development and International Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Timor Sea Conciliation (Timor-Leste v. Australia): A Note on the Commission's Decision on Competence\",\"authors\":\"Jianjun Gao\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00908320.2018.1479370\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The Timor Sea Conciliation is the first experience with the compulsory conciliation under Annex V of the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. The Conciliation Commission addressed the objections to its competence as a preliminary matter and rendered a separate decision. This article examines the approach of the Conciliation Commission in dealing with its competence issues and the understandings of the Conciliation Commission as regards the relevant provisions of the 1982 Convention.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45771,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ocean Development and International Law\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ocean Development and International Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00908320.2018.1479370\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocean Development and International Law","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00908320.2018.1479370","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

摘要

帝汶海调解是根据1982年《联合国海洋法公约》附件五进行强制调解的第一次经验。调解委员会将对其职权的反对意见作为初步事项处理，并单独作出决定。本文审查了调解委员会处理其权限问题的方法，以及调解委员会对《1982年公约》有关条款的理解。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Timor Sea Conciliation (Timor-Leste v. Australia): A Note on the Commission's Decision on Competence

ABSTRACT The Timor Sea Conciliation is the first experience with the compulsory conciliation under Annex V of the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. The Conciliation Commission addressed the objections to its competence as a preliminary matter and rendered a separate decision. This article examines the approach of the Conciliation Commission in dealing with its competence issues and the understandings of the Conciliation Commission as regards the relevant provisions of the 1982 Convention.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Ocean Development and International Law Multiple-

CiteScore

2.00

自引率

8.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： Ocean Development and International Law is devoted to all aspects of international and comparative law and policy concerning the management of ocean use and activities. It focuses on the international aspects of ocean regulation, ocean affairs, and all forms of ocean utilization. The journal publishes high quality works of scholarship in such related disciplines as international law of the sea, comparative domestic ocean law, political science, marine economics, geography, shipping, the marine sciences, and ocean engineering and other sea-oriented technologies. Discussions of policy alternatives and factors relevant to policy are emphasized, as are contributions of a theoretical and methodological nature.