不同入路腹膜透析导管出口护理的临床效果

Craig Lockwood RN BN GradDip (ClinNurs) MNSC,  Brent Hodgkinson MSc, Tamara Page RN BN HyperbaricNursCert GradDipNSc(HighDep)
{"title":"不同入路腹膜透析导管出口护理的临床效果","authors":"Craig Lockwood RN BN GradDip (ClinNurs) MNSC,&nbsp; Brent Hodgkinson MSc,&nbsp;Tamara Page RN BN HyperbaricNursCert GradDipNSc(HighDep)","doi":"10.1046/j.1479-697X.2003.00006.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p><b>Objective</b> The objective of this review was to appraise and synthesise the best available evidence on the clinical effectiveness of peritoneal dialysis catheter exit-site care.</p>\n <p><b>Inclusion criteria</b> This review considered all randomised controlled trials that evaluated the effectiveness of peritoneal exit-site care. In the absence of randomised controlled trials, other controlled research designs such as non-randomised controlled trials were considered for inclusion in a narrative summary to enable the identification of current approaches and possible future strategies. Participants of interest were adults with chronic renal failure on maintenance peritoneal dialysis. Interventions of interest were those used to manage peritoneal catheter exit sites, and included types of dressings, frequency of dressings, types of skin care, and use of topical antiseptic or antimicrobial agents.</p>\n <p><b>Search strategy</b> The search sought to find both published and unpublished studies. An initial limited search of MEDLINE and CINAHL databases was undertaken to identify key words contained in the title or abstract, and index terms used to describe relevant articles. A second extensive search was undertaken using all identified key words and index terms. The third step was a search of the reference lists and bibliographies of all relevant articles.</p>\n <p><b>Methodological quality</b> All identified studies that met the inclusion criteria were assessed for methodological validity by two reviewers prior to inclusion in the review. Critical appraisal of studies focused on identifying bias in selection, performance, attrition and detection.</p>\n <p><b>Results</b> This review found few studies of sufficient quality to meet the inclusion criteria. The included studies often utilised historical control groups, potentially confounding measurement of their outcomes. The outcome measures varied considerably, thus meta-analysis was not possible.</p>\n <p><b>Conclusions</b> This review suggests topical mupirocin may reduce the risk of exit-site infection; however, the clinical effectiveness of any one antibiotic, antiseptic or dressing procedure was not established for the prevention or reduction of exit-site infection rates or peritonitis. This review has underlined large gaps in the existing knowledge on the care of exit sites in patients on peritoneal dialysis.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100738,"journal":{"name":"JBI Reports","volume":"1 6","pages":"167-201"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1479-697X.2003.00006.x","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical effectiveness of different approaches to peritoneal dialysis catheter exit-site care\",\"authors\":\"Craig Lockwood RN BN GradDip (ClinNurs) MNSC,&nbsp; Brent Hodgkinson MSc,&nbsp;Tamara Page RN BN HyperbaricNursCert GradDipNSc(HighDep)\",\"doi\":\"10.1046/j.1479-697X.2003.00006.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p><b>Objective</b> The objective of this review was to appraise and synthesise the best available evidence on the clinical effectiveness of peritoneal dialysis catheter exit-site care.</p>\\n <p><b>Inclusion criteria</b> This review considered all randomised controlled trials that evaluated the effectiveness of peritoneal exit-site care. In the absence of randomised controlled trials, other controlled research designs such as non-randomised controlled trials were considered for inclusion in a narrative summary to enable the identification of current approaches and possible future strategies. Participants of interest were adults with chronic renal failure on maintenance peritoneal dialysis. Interventions of interest were those used to manage peritoneal catheter exit sites, and included types of dressings, frequency of dressings, types of skin care, and use of topical antiseptic or antimicrobial agents.</p>\\n <p><b>Search strategy</b> The search sought to find both published and unpublished studies. An initial limited search of MEDLINE and CINAHL databases was undertaken to identify key words contained in the title or abstract, and index terms used to describe relevant articles. A second extensive search was undertaken using all identified key words and index terms. The third step was a search of the reference lists and bibliographies of all relevant articles.</p>\\n <p><b>Methodological quality</b> All identified studies that met the inclusion criteria were assessed for methodological validity by two reviewers prior to inclusion in the review. Critical appraisal of studies focused on identifying bias in selection, performance, attrition and detection.</p>\\n <p><b>Results</b> This review found few studies of sufficient quality to meet the inclusion criteria. The included studies often utilised historical control groups, potentially confounding measurement of their outcomes. The outcome measures varied considerably, thus meta-analysis was not possible.</p>\\n <p><b>Conclusions</b> This review suggests topical mupirocin may reduce the risk of exit-site infection; however, the clinical effectiveness of any one antibiotic, antiseptic or dressing procedure was not established for the prevention or reduction of exit-site infection rates or peritonitis. This review has underlined large gaps in the existing knowledge on the care of exit sites in patients on peritoneal dialysis.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100738,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JBI Reports\",\"volume\":\"1 6\",\"pages\":\"167-201\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1479-697X.2003.00006.x\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JBI Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1479-697X.2003.00006.x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1479-697X.2003.00006.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

目的本综述的目的是评价和综合现有的关于腹膜透析导管出口护理的临床效果的最佳证据。纳入标准:本综述纳入了所有评估腹膜出口护理有效性的随机对照试验。在没有随机对照试验的情况下,其他对照研究设计,如非随机对照试验,被考虑纳入叙述性总结,以确定当前的方法和可能的未来策略。研究对象为接受维持性腹膜透析的慢性肾功能衰竭的成年人。关注的干预措施是那些用于管理腹膜导管出口部位的干预措施,包括敷料的类型、敷料的频率、皮肤护理的类型以及局部防腐剂或抗菌剂的使用。搜索策略搜索旨在找到已发表和未发表的研究。对MEDLINE和CINAHL数据库进行初步有限搜索,以确定标题或摘要中包含的关键词,以及用于描述相关文章的索引术语。使用所有确定的关键字和索引项进行第二次广泛搜索。第三步是查找所有相关文章的参考书目和参考书目。方法学质量所有符合纳入标准的研究在纳入本综述前由两名审稿人评估方法学效度。对研究的批判性评价侧重于确定在选择、表现、损耗和检测方面的偏见。结果本综述发现很少有足够质量的研究符合纳入标准。纳入的研究通常使用历史对照组,这可能会混淆其结果的测量。结果测量差异很大,因此不可能进行meta分析。结论本综述提示外用莫匹罗星可降低手术部位外感染的风险;然而,任何一种抗生素、防腐剂或敷料程序在预防或减少手术部位外感染率或腹膜炎方面的临床效果尚未确定。这篇综述强调了在腹膜透析患者出口部位护理方面现有知识的巨大差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical effectiveness of different approaches to peritoneal dialysis catheter exit-site care

Objective The objective of this review was to appraise and synthesise the best available evidence on the clinical effectiveness of peritoneal dialysis catheter exit-site care.

Inclusion criteria This review considered all randomised controlled trials that evaluated the effectiveness of peritoneal exit-site care. In the absence of randomised controlled trials, other controlled research designs such as non-randomised controlled trials were considered for inclusion in a narrative summary to enable the identification of current approaches and possible future strategies. Participants of interest were adults with chronic renal failure on maintenance peritoneal dialysis. Interventions of interest were those used to manage peritoneal catheter exit sites, and included types of dressings, frequency of dressings, types of skin care, and use of topical antiseptic or antimicrobial agents.

Search strategy The search sought to find both published and unpublished studies. An initial limited search of MEDLINE and CINAHL databases was undertaken to identify key words contained in the title or abstract, and index terms used to describe relevant articles. A second extensive search was undertaken using all identified key words and index terms. The third step was a search of the reference lists and bibliographies of all relevant articles.

Methodological quality All identified studies that met the inclusion criteria were assessed for methodological validity by two reviewers prior to inclusion in the review. Critical appraisal of studies focused on identifying bias in selection, performance, attrition and detection.

Results This review found few studies of sufficient quality to meet the inclusion criteria. The included studies often utilised historical control groups, potentially confounding measurement of their outcomes. The outcome measures varied considerably, thus meta-analysis was not possible.

Conclusions This review suggests topical mupirocin may reduce the risk of exit-site infection; however, the clinical effectiveness of any one antibiotic, antiseptic or dressing procedure was not established for the prevention or reduction of exit-site infection rates or peritonitis. This review has underlined large gaps in the existing knowledge on the care of exit sites in patients on peritoneal dialysis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信