{"title":"最优与朴素多样化:错误发现、交易成本和机器学习","authors":"A. Zareei","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3346139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper shows that sophisticated diversification strategies never underperform the 1/N rule when adjusting for multiple testing; however, their edge is severely undermined by transaction costs. As a way forward, this paper provides a machine learning approach for ex-ante strategy selection. By linking the characteristics of investment scenarios to the out-of-sample performance of strategies, the algorithm never underperforms the 1/N rule, even in the presence of relatively high transaction costs.","PeriodicalId":18891,"journal":{"name":"Mutual Funds","volume":"127 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal versus Naive Diversification: False Discoveries, Transaction Costs and Machine Learning\",\"authors\":\"A. Zareei\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3346139\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper shows that sophisticated diversification strategies never underperform the 1/N rule when adjusting for multiple testing; however, their edge is severely undermined by transaction costs. As a way forward, this paper provides a machine learning approach for ex-ante strategy selection. By linking the characteristics of investment scenarios to the out-of-sample performance of strategies, the algorithm never underperforms the 1/N rule, even in the presence of relatively high transaction costs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18891,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mutual Funds\",\"volume\":\"127 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mutual Funds\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3346139\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mutual Funds","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3346139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Optimal versus Naive Diversification: False Discoveries, Transaction Costs and Machine Learning
This paper shows that sophisticated diversification strategies never underperform the 1/N rule when adjusting for multiple testing; however, their edge is severely undermined by transaction costs. As a way forward, this paper provides a machine learning approach for ex-ante strategy selection. By linking the characteristics of investment scenarios to the out-of-sample performance of strategies, the algorithm never underperforms the 1/N rule, even in the presence of relatively high transaction costs.