探讨辩论参与、沟通能力、沟通理解和辩论能力之间的关系

IF 0.5 Q4 COMMUNICATION
William T. Howe, Ioana A. Cionea
{"title":"探讨辩论参与、沟通能力、沟通理解和辩论能力之间的关系","authors":"William T. Howe, Ioana A. Cionea","doi":"10.1080/10511431.2021.1897274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this original research study, we examined how participating in debate is associated with communication competence (CC), communication apprehension (CA), and argumentativeness (ARG). A sample of participants (N = 201) from around the globe filled out an online survey where they reported demographic information (including debate experience) and completed scales measuring CC, CA, and ARG. Differences between these variables were then examined based on categories such as debaters and non-debaters, US and non-US residency, men and women. Results revealed participants with debate experience scored systematically different than those with no debate experience, even when controlling for participants’ sex and residency geographic region. Previously established relationships between CC, CA, and ARG were also supported. Additionally, significant differences were noted between US participants and non-US participants for several variables. No significant differences were found between men and women; however, an interaction effect between debate participation and sex was found. These results, including their practical implications, are discussed in the context of communication competence and apprehension research as well as argumentation literature.","PeriodicalId":29934,"journal":{"name":"Argumentation and Advocacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the associations between debate participation, communication competence, communication apprehension, and argumentativeness with a global sample\",\"authors\":\"William T. Howe, Ioana A. Cionea\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10511431.2021.1897274\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In this original research study, we examined how participating in debate is associated with communication competence (CC), communication apprehension (CA), and argumentativeness (ARG). A sample of participants (N = 201) from around the globe filled out an online survey where they reported demographic information (including debate experience) and completed scales measuring CC, CA, and ARG. Differences between these variables were then examined based on categories such as debaters and non-debaters, US and non-US residency, men and women. Results revealed participants with debate experience scored systematically different than those with no debate experience, even when controlling for participants’ sex and residency geographic region. Previously established relationships between CC, CA, and ARG were also supported. Additionally, significant differences were noted between US participants and non-US participants for several variables. No significant differences were found between men and women; however, an interaction effect between debate participation and sex was found. These results, including their practical implications, are discussed in the context of communication competence and apprehension research as well as argumentation literature.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29934,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Argumentation and Advocacy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Argumentation and Advocacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10511431.2021.1897274\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Argumentation and Advocacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10511431.2021.1897274","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要:在这项原创研究中,我们研究了参与辩论与沟通能力(CC)、沟通理解(CA)和辩论能力(ARG)之间的关系。来自世界各地的参与者样本(N = 201)填写了一份在线调查,他们报告了人口统计信息(包括辩论经验),并完成了测量CC、CA和ARG的量表。然后根据辩手和非辩手、美国和非美国居民、男性和女性等类别来检查这些变量之间的差异。结果显示,即使在控制了参与者的性别和居住地理区域后,有辩论经验的参与者与没有辩论经验的参与者的得分也存在系统性差异。之前建立的CC、CA和ARG之间的关系也得到了支持。此外,在几个变量上,美国参与者和非美国参与者之间存在显著差异。在男性和女性之间没有发现显著差异;然而,辩论参与和性别之间的互动效应被发现。这些结果及其实际意义将在交际能力和理解研究以及论证文献的背景下进行讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the associations between debate participation, communication competence, communication apprehension, and argumentativeness with a global sample
Abstract In this original research study, we examined how participating in debate is associated with communication competence (CC), communication apprehension (CA), and argumentativeness (ARG). A sample of participants (N = 201) from around the globe filled out an online survey where they reported demographic information (including debate experience) and completed scales measuring CC, CA, and ARG. Differences between these variables were then examined based on categories such as debaters and non-debaters, US and non-US residency, men and women. Results revealed participants with debate experience scored systematically different than those with no debate experience, even when controlling for participants’ sex and residency geographic region. Previously established relationships between CC, CA, and ARG were also supported. Additionally, significant differences were noted between US participants and non-US participants for several variables. No significant differences were found between men and women; however, an interaction effect between debate participation and sex was found. These results, including their practical implications, are discussed in the context of communication competence and apprehension research as well as argumentation literature.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信