中间段落:在缺乏细节的情况下,呈现和再现历史空白

Q4 Arts and Humanities
Rinaldo Walcott
{"title":"中间段落:在缺乏细节的情况下,呈现和再现历史空白","authors":"Rinaldo Walcott","doi":"10.17159/2309-9585/2018/V44A4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What might it mean to imagine the Middle Passage? What work does imagining the Middle Passage do? Despite its centrality in invocations of transatlantic slavery, representations of the Middle Passage are few. By representations of the Middle Passage, I mean artistic representations across literature, film, music, and visual art that seek to offer imaginative insights into its horrors. M. NourbeSe Philip’s 2008 long poem, Zong! not only documents the murder of some 150 Africans aboard the slave ship from which the poem takes its name, it does something more. The poetics of Zong! enacts those that have gone missing, and thus emerges into a void to place into evidence that which we assumed we had lost. The work of imagination in the poem replaces that which we might think had gone missing prior to its poetic representation. Through reworking and reordering the legal decision in the 1783 court case, Gregson v. Gilbert,1 Philip’s poem recounts the story of the slave ship Zong. The poem re-presents the evidence of the mass murder in the voice of those we might otherwise not hear in such legal documents, in this instance that of Setaey Adamu Boateng. Philip shares authorship of Zong! with Setaey Adamu Boateng, who she tells us guided her and aided her in the recovery and creation the story of the Zong. In this case then, Zong! also exceeds the poem as a form and genre, and even as an event in the proper use of that term. To do so, Philip must break language and break with language. The very page, the architecture of each page of the poem spatialises the break with language, and its representation on the page, as one of voids and or missingness, and simultaneously fills those gaps with knowledge, with untold history, with people and lives that would otherwise remain unknown. Philip’s Zong! is a poem that is a sort of return, but a return, too, brings with it the problem of the missing, the problem of the void. It is a poem that requires us to think the Atlantic Ocean differently and anew. The pages of Zong! exhibit a labour that is intellectual, psychical and psychic, and demands a certain commitment from the reader. Philip, as poet, does not tell the story. Instead, the poet is the medium for Setaey Adamu Boateng; the poet repeats the story as told to her in the form of the written text. Immediately, Philip draws on a practice that is doubled: the ‘as told to’ is a central element of the slave narrative in","PeriodicalId":53088,"journal":{"name":"Kronos","volume":"6 1","pages":"59-68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Middle Passage: In the Absence of Detail, Presenting and Representing a Historical Void\",\"authors\":\"Rinaldo Walcott\",\"doi\":\"10.17159/2309-9585/2018/V44A4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"What might it mean to imagine the Middle Passage? What work does imagining the Middle Passage do? Despite its centrality in invocations of transatlantic slavery, representations of the Middle Passage are few. By representations of the Middle Passage, I mean artistic representations across literature, film, music, and visual art that seek to offer imaginative insights into its horrors. M. NourbeSe Philip’s 2008 long poem, Zong! not only documents the murder of some 150 Africans aboard the slave ship from which the poem takes its name, it does something more. The poetics of Zong! enacts those that have gone missing, and thus emerges into a void to place into evidence that which we assumed we had lost. The work of imagination in the poem replaces that which we might think had gone missing prior to its poetic representation. Through reworking and reordering the legal decision in the 1783 court case, Gregson v. Gilbert,1 Philip’s poem recounts the story of the slave ship Zong. The poem re-presents the evidence of the mass murder in the voice of those we might otherwise not hear in such legal documents, in this instance that of Setaey Adamu Boateng. Philip shares authorship of Zong! with Setaey Adamu Boateng, who she tells us guided her and aided her in the recovery and creation the story of the Zong. In this case then, Zong! also exceeds the poem as a form and genre, and even as an event in the proper use of that term. To do so, Philip must break language and break with language. The very page, the architecture of each page of the poem spatialises the break with language, and its representation on the page, as one of voids and or missingness, and simultaneously fills those gaps with knowledge, with untold history, with people and lives that would otherwise remain unknown. Philip’s Zong! is a poem that is a sort of return, but a return, too, brings with it the problem of the missing, the problem of the void. It is a poem that requires us to think the Atlantic Ocean differently and anew. The pages of Zong! exhibit a labour that is intellectual, psychical and psychic, and demands a certain commitment from the reader. Philip, as poet, does not tell the story. Instead, the poet is the medium for Setaey Adamu Boateng; the poet repeats the story as told to her in the form of the written text. Immediately, Philip draws on a practice that is doubled: the ‘as told to’ is a central element of the slave narrative in\",\"PeriodicalId\":53088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kronos\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"59-68\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kronos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17159/2309-9585/2018/V44A4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kronos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/2309-9585/2018/V44A4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

想象中部航道意味着什么?想象中间航道有什么作用?尽管它在跨大西洋奴隶制的召唤中处于中心地位,但对中间航道的描述却很少。通过对《中间航道》的再现,我指的是通过文学、电影、音乐和视觉艺术的艺术表现,试图提供对其恐怖的富有想象力的见解。菲利普2008年的长诗《宗!》这首诗不仅记录了大约150名非洲人在一艘奴隶船上被谋杀的事件,它还做了更多的事情。宗的诗学!使那些已经丢失的东西重新出现,从而出现在一个空白中,将我们认为已经丢失的东西放入证据中。诗歌中想象力的工作取代了我们认为在诗歌表现之前缺失的东西。通过对1783年格莱格森诉吉尔伯特案的法律判决的修改和重新排序,菲利普的诗讲述了奴隶船宗号的故事。这首诗再现了大屠杀的证据,这些人的声音我们可能不会在这样的法律文件中听到,在这种情况下,Setaey Adamu Boateng。菲利普分享宗的作者!与Setaey Adamu Boateng一起,她告诉我们,她指导并帮助她恢复和创造了宗的故事。在这种情况下,宗!也超越了诗歌作为一种形式和体裁,甚至作为一个事件在恰当的使用这个术语。要做到这一点,菲利普必须打破语言,与语言决裂。诗的每一页,每一页的结构都将语言的断裂,以及它在书页上的表现,作为一种空白和/或缺失,空间化了,同时用知识填补了这些空白,用不为人知的历史,用不为人知的人和生活填补了这些空白。菲利普的宗庆后!这首诗是一种回归,但回归也带来了缺失的问题,空虚的问题。这是一首要求我们以不同的方式重新思考大西洋的诗。《宗!》展现一种智力上、精神上和精神上的劳动,要求读者做出一定的承诺。作为诗人,菲利普并没有讲述这个故事。相反,诗人是Setaey Adamu Boateng的媒介;诗人以书面文本的形式重复她所听到的故事。紧接着,菲利普引用了一种双重的做法:“被告知”是《圣经》中奴隶叙事的核心元素
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Middle Passage: In the Absence of Detail, Presenting and Representing a Historical Void
What might it mean to imagine the Middle Passage? What work does imagining the Middle Passage do? Despite its centrality in invocations of transatlantic slavery, representations of the Middle Passage are few. By representations of the Middle Passage, I mean artistic representations across literature, film, music, and visual art that seek to offer imaginative insights into its horrors. M. NourbeSe Philip’s 2008 long poem, Zong! not only documents the murder of some 150 Africans aboard the slave ship from which the poem takes its name, it does something more. The poetics of Zong! enacts those that have gone missing, and thus emerges into a void to place into evidence that which we assumed we had lost. The work of imagination in the poem replaces that which we might think had gone missing prior to its poetic representation. Through reworking and reordering the legal decision in the 1783 court case, Gregson v. Gilbert,1 Philip’s poem recounts the story of the slave ship Zong. The poem re-presents the evidence of the mass murder in the voice of those we might otherwise not hear in such legal documents, in this instance that of Setaey Adamu Boateng. Philip shares authorship of Zong! with Setaey Adamu Boateng, who she tells us guided her and aided her in the recovery and creation the story of the Zong. In this case then, Zong! also exceeds the poem as a form and genre, and even as an event in the proper use of that term. To do so, Philip must break language and break with language. The very page, the architecture of each page of the poem spatialises the break with language, and its representation on the page, as one of voids and or missingness, and simultaneously fills those gaps with knowledge, with untold history, with people and lives that would otherwise remain unknown. Philip’s Zong! is a poem that is a sort of return, but a return, too, brings with it the problem of the missing, the problem of the void. It is a poem that requires us to think the Atlantic Ocean differently and anew. The pages of Zong! exhibit a labour that is intellectual, psychical and psychic, and demands a certain commitment from the reader. Philip, as poet, does not tell the story. Instead, the poet is the medium for Setaey Adamu Boateng; the poet repeats the story as told to her in the form of the written text. Immediately, Philip draws on a practice that is doubled: the ‘as told to’ is a central element of the slave narrative in
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Kronos
Kronos Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信