低成本普及设备的HBC实体身份验证

Zhijun Li, G. Gong
{"title":"低成本普及设备的HBC实体身份验证","authors":"Zhijun Li, G. Gong","doi":"10.1049/iet-ifs.2011.0052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The HB-like entity authentication protocols for low-cost pervasive devices have attracted a great deal of attention because of their simplicity, computational efficiency and solid security foundation on a well-studied hard problem–learning parity with noise. By far, the most efficient protocol is HB#, which is provably resistant to the GRS attack under the conjecture that it is secure in the DET-model. However, in order to achieve 80-bit security, a typical HB# authentication key comprises over 1000 bits, which imposes considerable storage burdens on resource-constrained devices. In this study, the authors propose a new HB-like protocol: HB. The protocol makes use of a special type of circulant matrix, in contrast to the Toeplitz matrix in HB#, to significantly reduce storage consumption and overcome a subtle security proof inefficacy in HB#. In addition, the authors introduce a masking technique that substantially increases noise level from an adversary's standpoint, and thus improves protocol performance. The authors demonstrate that 613-bit authentication key suffices for 80-bit security in the HB protocol, which is quite competitive and more appealing for low-cost devices.","PeriodicalId":13305,"journal":{"name":"IET Inf. Secur.","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"HBC entity authentication for low-cost pervasive devices\",\"authors\":\"Zhijun Li, G. Gong\",\"doi\":\"10.1049/iet-ifs.2011.0052\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The HB-like entity authentication protocols for low-cost pervasive devices have attracted a great deal of attention because of their simplicity, computational efficiency and solid security foundation on a well-studied hard problem–learning parity with noise. By far, the most efficient protocol is HB#, which is provably resistant to the GRS attack under the conjecture that it is secure in the DET-model. However, in order to achieve 80-bit security, a typical HB# authentication key comprises over 1000 bits, which imposes considerable storage burdens on resource-constrained devices. In this study, the authors propose a new HB-like protocol: HB. The protocol makes use of a special type of circulant matrix, in contrast to the Toeplitz matrix in HB#, to significantly reduce storage consumption and overcome a subtle security proof inefficacy in HB#. In addition, the authors introduce a masking technique that substantially increases noise level from an adversary's standpoint, and thus improves protocol performance. The authors demonstrate that 613-bit authentication key suffices for 80-bit security in the HB protocol, which is quite competitive and more appealing for low-cost devices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13305,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IET Inf. Secur.\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IET Inf. Secur.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-ifs.2011.0052\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IET Inf. Secur.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-ifs.2011.0052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

针对低成本普及设备的类hb实体身份验证协议由于其简单性、计算效率和坚实的安全性基础而引起了人们的广泛关注。到目前为止,最有效的协议是hb#,在假定它在dt模型中是安全的情况下,可以证明它抵抗GRS攻击。然而,为了实现80位的安全性,典型的hb#认证密钥包含超过1000位,这对资源受限的设备造成了相当大的存储负担。在这项研究中,作者提出了一种新的类HB方案:HB。与hb#中的Toeplitz矩阵相比,该协议使用了一种特殊类型的循环矩阵,以显着减少存储消耗并克服hb#中微妙的安全证明无效。此外,作者还介绍了一种掩蔽技术,从对手的角度来看,这种技术大大提高了噪声水平,从而提高了协议的性能。作者论证了HB协议中613位认证密钥足以满足80位安全性,这对低成本设备具有相当的竞争力和吸引力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
HBC entity authentication for low-cost pervasive devices
The HB-like entity authentication protocols for low-cost pervasive devices have attracted a great deal of attention because of their simplicity, computational efficiency and solid security foundation on a well-studied hard problem–learning parity with noise. By far, the most efficient protocol is HB#, which is provably resistant to the GRS attack under the conjecture that it is secure in the DET-model. However, in order to achieve 80-bit security, a typical HB# authentication key comprises over 1000 bits, which imposes considerable storage burdens on resource-constrained devices. In this study, the authors propose a new HB-like protocol: HB. The protocol makes use of a special type of circulant matrix, in contrast to the Toeplitz matrix in HB#, to significantly reduce storage consumption and overcome a subtle security proof inefficacy in HB#. In addition, the authors introduce a masking technique that substantially increases noise level from an adversary's standpoint, and thus improves protocol performance. The authors demonstrate that 613-bit authentication key suffices for 80-bit security in the HB protocol, which is quite competitive and more appealing for low-cost devices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信