预测慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重患者对Niv的需求:无咖啡因与改良无咖啡因评分的比较研究

Mushfiq Newaz Ahmed, Nihar Ranjan Saha, Md. Sayedul Islam
{"title":"预测慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重患者对Niv的需求:无咖啡因与改良无咖啡因评分的比较研究","authors":"Mushfiq Newaz Ahmed, Nihar Ranjan Saha, Md. Sayedul Islam","doi":"10.3329/bjm.v34i20.66162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) leads to multiple hospital admissions, longer hospital stays, increased treatment costs as well as increased morbidity and mortality. Currently, no optimal scoring system exists that can predict need for NIV in patients with acute exacerbation of COPD. Accurate prognostic tool can help physicians to select the appropriate level of care and preparedness.To compare DECAF [(D) dyspnoea, (E) eosinopenia, (C) consolidation, (A) acidemia, (F) atrial fibrillation] and modified DECAF score [(D) dyspnoea, (E) eosinopenia, (C) consolidation, (A) acidemia, (F) frequency of hospital admission] in predicting the need for NIV in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.\nMethods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Respiratory Medicine, NIDCH, Mohakhali, Dhaka from June 2021 to August 2022. A total of 91 patients with acute exacerbation of COPD were enrolled in this study. All patients were subjected to complete medical history taking, chest examination, dyspnoea assessment by extended modified Medical Research Council Dyspnoea (eMRCD), complete blood count, chest radiograph, ECG, and arterial blood gas analysis. Both DECAF and modified DECAF score were calculated and the need for NIV was documented. All collected data were analysed using appropriate statistical formula and SPSS programme.\nResults: Out of 91 patients, 20 patients (21.97%) required non-invasive ventilation. The area under the ROC curve of DECAF and modified DECAF score was 0.973 and 0.974 respectively in predicting the need for NIV. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of DECAF score were 84.21%, 94.44%, 80.00% and 95.77% respectively at a cut off value of 3. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of modified DECAF score were 84.52%, 100%, 100% and 96.51% respectively at a cut off value of 4\nConclusion: Both DECAF score and the modified DECAF score are practical and can be calculated easily using simple questions and routine investigations available during the initial admission. Both were good predictors, but modified DECAF was superior in predicting need for NIV in patients with acute exacerbation of COPD Bangladesh\nJ Medicine 2023; Vol. 34, No. 2(1) Supplement: 208-209          ","PeriodicalId":8721,"journal":{"name":"Bangladesh Journal of Veterinary Medicine","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction of the Need for Niv in Patients With Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Comparative Study Between Decaf And Modified Decaf Score\",\"authors\":\"Mushfiq Newaz Ahmed, Nihar Ranjan Saha, Md. Sayedul Islam\",\"doi\":\"10.3329/bjm.v34i20.66162\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) leads to multiple hospital admissions, longer hospital stays, increased treatment costs as well as increased morbidity and mortality. Currently, no optimal scoring system exists that can predict need for NIV in patients with acute exacerbation of COPD. Accurate prognostic tool can help physicians to select the appropriate level of care and preparedness.To compare DECAF [(D) dyspnoea, (E) eosinopenia, (C) consolidation, (A) acidemia, (F) atrial fibrillation] and modified DECAF score [(D) dyspnoea, (E) eosinopenia, (C) consolidation, (A) acidemia, (F) frequency of hospital admission] in predicting the need for NIV in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.\\nMethods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Respiratory Medicine, NIDCH, Mohakhali, Dhaka from June 2021 to August 2022. A total of 91 patients with acute exacerbation of COPD were enrolled in this study. All patients were subjected to complete medical history taking, chest examination, dyspnoea assessment by extended modified Medical Research Council Dyspnoea (eMRCD), complete blood count, chest radiograph, ECG, and arterial blood gas analysis. Both DECAF and modified DECAF score were calculated and the need for NIV was documented. All collected data were analysed using appropriate statistical formula and SPSS programme.\\nResults: Out of 91 patients, 20 patients (21.97%) required non-invasive ventilation. The area under the ROC curve of DECAF and modified DECAF score was 0.973 and 0.974 respectively in predicting the need for NIV. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of DECAF score were 84.21%, 94.44%, 80.00% and 95.77% respectively at a cut off value of 3. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of modified DECAF score were 84.52%, 100%, 100% and 96.51% respectively at a cut off value of 4\\nConclusion: Both DECAF score and the modified DECAF score are practical and can be calculated easily using simple questions and routine investigations available during the initial admission. Both were good predictors, but modified DECAF was superior in predicting need for NIV in patients with acute exacerbation of COPD Bangladesh\\nJ Medicine 2023; Vol. 34, No. 2(1) Supplement: 208-209          \",\"PeriodicalId\":8721,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bangladesh Journal of Veterinary Medicine\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bangladesh Journal of Veterinary Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3329/bjm.v34i20.66162\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bangladesh Journal of Veterinary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/bjm.v34i20.66162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的恶化导致多次住院,住院时间延长,治疗费用增加以及发病率和死亡率增加。目前,尚无最优评分系统能够预测COPD急性加重期患者是否需要使用NIV。准确的预后工具可以帮助医生选择适当的护理和准备水平。比较DECAF [(D)呼吸困难,(E)红细胞减少,(C)实变,(A)酸血症,(F)房颤]和改良的DECAF评分[(D)呼吸困难,(E)红细胞减少,(C)实变,(A)酸血症,(F)住院次数]预测慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重期患者是否需要使用无创通气。方法:本横断面研究于2021年6月至2022年8月在达卡Mohakhali NIDCH呼吸内科进行。共有91例COPD急性加重患者参加了这项研究。所有患者均接受完整的病史记录、胸部检查、呼吸困难评估(eMRCD)、全血细胞计数、胸片、心电图和动脉血气分析。计算DECAF和改良DECAF评分,记录有无需要使用NIV。所有收集的数据采用相应的统计公式和SPSS程序进行分析。结果:91例患者中有20例(21.97%)需要无创通气。DECAF评分和修正DECAF评分的ROC曲线下面积分别为0.973和0.974。在截断值为3时,DECAF评分的敏感性为84.21%,特异性为94.44%,PPV和NPV分别为80.00%和95.77%。修正后的DECAF评分的敏感性为84.52%,特异性为100%,PPV为100%,NPV为96.51%,临界值为4。结论:修正后的DECAF评分和修正后的DECAF评分均具有实用性,可通过入院时的简单问题和常规调查轻松计算。两者都是良好的预测指标,但改良的DECAF在预测COPD急性加重患者是否需要NIV方面更优[孟加拉国医药2023];第34卷,第2(1)增编:208-209
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prediction of the Need for Niv in Patients With Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Comparative Study Between Decaf And Modified Decaf Score
Background: Exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) leads to multiple hospital admissions, longer hospital stays, increased treatment costs as well as increased morbidity and mortality. Currently, no optimal scoring system exists that can predict need for NIV in patients with acute exacerbation of COPD. Accurate prognostic tool can help physicians to select the appropriate level of care and preparedness.To compare DECAF [(D) dyspnoea, (E) eosinopenia, (C) consolidation, (A) acidemia, (F) atrial fibrillation] and modified DECAF score [(D) dyspnoea, (E) eosinopenia, (C) consolidation, (A) acidemia, (F) frequency of hospital admission] in predicting the need for NIV in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Respiratory Medicine, NIDCH, Mohakhali, Dhaka from June 2021 to August 2022. A total of 91 patients with acute exacerbation of COPD were enrolled in this study. All patients were subjected to complete medical history taking, chest examination, dyspnoea assessment by extended modified Medical Research Council Dyspnoea (eMRCD), complete blood count, chest radiograph, ECG, and arterial blood gas analysis. Both DECAF and modified DECAF score were calculated and the need for NIV was documented. All collected data were analysed using appropriate statistical formula and SPSS programme. Results: Out of 91 patients, 20 patients (21.97%) required non-invasive ventilation. The area under the ROC curve of DECAF and modified DECAF score was 0.973 and 0.974 respectively in predicting the need for NIV. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of DECAF score were 84.21%, 94.44%, 80.00% and 95.77% respectively at a cut off value of 3. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of modified DECAF score were 84.52%, 100%, 100% and 96.51% respectively at a cut off value of 4 Conclusion: Both DECAF score and the modified DECAF score are practical and can be calculated easily using simple questions and routine investigations available during the initial admission. Both were good predictors, but modified DECAF was superior in predicting need for NIV in patients with acute exacerbation of COPD Bangladesh J Medicine 2023; Vol. 34, No. 2(1) Supplement: 208-209          
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信