使用特定于应用程序的代码约定作为代码注释的补充方法有意义吗?

Q4 Social Sciences
R. Teixeira, E. Guerra, Phyllipe Lima, Paulo Meirelles, Fabio Kon
{"title":"使用特定于应用程序的代码约定作为代码注释的补充方法有意义吗?","authors":"R. Teixeira, E. Guerra, Phyllipe Lima, Paulo Meirelles, Fabio Kon","doi":"10.1145/3281074.3281078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Code annotations are extensively used by Java developers, especially in enterprise frameworks and APIs such as Spring and Java EE. Different code elements that frequently share some similarities, sometimes, repeat the annotations. The goal of this paper is to evaluate whether a real-world system could use code conventions as a means to avoid replicating code annotations. We report on a study on the software used for the EMBRACE Space Weather program at INPE to search for similarities.","PeriodicalId":38836,"journal":{"name":"Meta: Avaliacao","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does it make sense to have application-specific code conventions as a complementary approach to code annotations?\",\"authors\":\"R. Teixeira, E. Guerra, Phyllipe Lima, Paulo Meirelles, Fabio Kon\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3281074.3281078\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Code annotations are extensively used by Java developers, especially in enterprise frameworks and APIs such as Spring and Java EE. Different code elements that frequently share some similarities, sometimes, repeat the annotations. The goal of this paper is to evaluate whether a real-world system could use code conventions as a means to avoid replicating code annotations. We report on a study on the software used for the EMBRACE Space Weather program at INPE to search for similarities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38836,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Meta: Avaliacao\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Meta: Avaliacao\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3281074.3281078\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Meta: Avaliacao","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3281074.3281078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

Java开发人员广泛使用代码注释,特别是在企业框架和api(如Spring和Java EE)中。经常共享某些相似之处的不同代码元素有时会重复注释。本文的目标是评估现实世界的系统是否可以使用代码约定作为避免复制代码注释的手段。我们报告了一项关于INPE“拥抱空间天气”项目所用软件的研究,以寻找相似之处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does it make sense to have application-specific code conventions as a complementary approach to code annotations?
Code annotations are extensively used by Java developers, especially in enterprise frameworks and APIs such as Spring and Java EE. Different code elements that frequently share some similarities, sometimes, repeat the annotations. The goal of this paper is to evaluate whether a real-world system could use code conventions as a means to avoid replicating code annotations. We report on a study on the software used for the EMBRACE Space Weather program at INPE to search for similarities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Meta: Avaliacao
Meta: Avaliacao Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信