P. Pandey, A. Pande, Smriti Mishra, D. Setya, A. Devra, V. Sinha, A. Bhatt
{"title":"380例肾移植病例luminex交叉配合法及其平均荧光强度的回顾性观察。","authors":"P. Pandey, A. Pande, Smriti Mishra, D. Setya, A. Devra, V. Sinha, A. Bhatt","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0015.6985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Cell-based complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (CDC-XM) and solid phase assays were introduced for assessing HLA antibodies. However, the complexity of data from cell-based and solid phase assays have led to potential confusion about how to use the results for clinical decision making. Aim: Aim of this study was to compare results of cell-based assay and solid phase assay, to evaluate the usefulness of L-XM for pretransplant detection of HLA class I and II donor-specific IgG antibodies, correlate the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) values of class I and class II L-XM assay and with CDC-XM and L-PRA (panel reactive antibodies) results. Methods: In this retrospective study, 380 prospective renal transplant recipients were tested for the presence of HLA antibodies by CDC-XM, IgG-L-XM, IgG-L-PRA & L-SAB screening with their corresponding donor. Results: Fifty-one recipients (13.42%) had a positive CDC-XM. L-XM was positive in 125 recipients (32.89%); class I-L-XM was positive in 46 (36.80%) cases, and class II-L-XM was positive in 58 (46.4%) cases and 21 (16.8%) samples were positive for class I and class II. High background was present in 22 (5.87%) samples, the results of which were confirmed by retesting or by correlation with L-PRA and L-SAB assays. Conclusion: The introduction of more sensitive approaches for the detection of anti-HLA-IgG-antibodies, such as L-XM and L-PRA assay, has allowed the identification of anti-HLA-antibodies in recipient serum which is not usually identified by CDC-XM alone. However, L-XM has some limitations; they can be overcome if we combine this assay with L-PRA.","PeriodicalId":43422,"journal":{"name":"Polish Journal of Surgery","volume":"52 1","pages":"38-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Significance of Luminex-crossmatch assay and its mean fluorescence intensity - a retrospective observation in 380 renal transplant cases.\",\"authors\":\"P. Pandey, A. Pande, Smriti Mishra, D. Setya, A. Devra, V. Sinha, A. Bhatt\",\"doi\":\"10.5604/01.3001.0015.6985\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Cell-based complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (CDC-XM) and solid phase assays were introduced for assessing HLA antibodies. However, the complexity of data from cell-based and solid phase assays have led to potential confusion about how to use the results for clinical decision making. Aim: Aim of this study was to compare results of cell-based assay and solid phase assay, to evaluate the usefulness of L-XM for pretransplant detection of HLA class I and II donor-specific IgG antibodies, correlate the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) values of class I and class II L-XM assay and with CDC-XM and L-PRA (panel reactive antibodies) results. Methods: In this retrospective study, 380 prospective renal transplant recipients were tested for the presence of HLA antibodies by CDC-XM, IgG-L-XM, IgG-L-PRA & L-SAB screening with their corresponding donor. Results: Fifty-one recipients (13.42%) had a positive CDC-XM. L-XM was positive in 125 recipients (32.89%); class I-L-XM was positive in 46 (36.80%) cases, and class II-L-XM was positive in 58 (46.4%) cases and 21 (16.8%) samples were positive for class I and class II. High background was present in 22 (5.87%) samples, the results of which were confirmed by retesting or by correlation with L-PRA and L-SAB assays. Conclusion: The introduction of more sensitive approaches for the detection of anti-HLA-IgG-antibodies, such as L-XM and L-PRA assay, has allowed the identification of anti-HLA-antibodies in recipient serum which is not usually identified by CDC-XM alone. However, L-XM has some limitations; they can be overcome if we combine this assay with L-PRA.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polish Journal of Surgery\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"38-48\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polish Journal of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.6985\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.6985","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
介绍:基于细胞的补体依赖性细胞毒性交叉匹配(CDC-XM)和固相测定法被用于评估HLA抗体。然而,基于细胞和固相测定的数据的复杂性导致了如何将结果用于临床决策的潜在混乱。目的:本研究的目的是比较细胞法和固相法的结果,评价L-XM在移植前检测HLAⅰ类和ⅱ类供体特异性IgG抗体的有效性,将ⅰ类和ⅱ类L-XM法的平均荧光强度(MFI)值与dc - xm和L-PRA(面板反应性抗体)结果相关联。方法:回顾性研究380例准肾移植受者与相应供者通过CDC-XM、IgG-L-XM、IgG-L-PRA和L-SAB筛查进行HLA抗体检测。结果:51例受者(13.42%)CDC-XM阳性。L-XM阳性125例(32.89%);I- l - xm类46例(36.80%)阳性,II- l - xm类58例(46.4%)阳性,I类和II类21例(16.8%)阳性。22份(5.87%)样品存在高本底,经复验或与L-PRA和L-SAB测定的相关性证实。结论:L-XM、L-PRA等检测hla - igg抗体的更灵敏方法的引入,使受体血清中抗hla抗体的鉴定成为可能,而这些抗体通常仅通过CDC-XM无法鉴定。但是,L-XM有一些限制;如果我们将这个实验与L-PRA结合起来,它们就可以被克服。
Significance of Luminex-crossmatch assay and its mean fluorescence intensity - a retrospective observation in 380 renal transplant cases.
Introduction: Cell-based complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (CDC-XM) and solid phase assays were introduced for assessing HLA antibodies. However, the complexity of data from cell-based and solid phase assays have led to potential confusion about how to use the results for clinical decision making. Aim: Aim of this study was to compare results of cell-based assay and solid phase assay, to evaluate the usefulness of L-XM for pretransplant detection of HLA class I and II donor-specific IgG antibodies, correlate the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) values of class I and class II L-XM assay and with CDC-XM and L-PRA (panel reactive antibodies) results. Methods: In this retrospective study, 380 prospective renal transplant recipients were tested for the presence of HLA antibodies by CDC-XM, IgG-L-XM, IgG-L-PRA & L-SAB screening with their corresponding donor. Results: Fifty-one recipients (13.42%) had a positive CDC-XM. L-XM was positive in 125 recipients (32.89%); class I-L-XM was positive in 46 (36.80%) cases, and class II-L-XM was positive in 58 (46.4%) cases and 21 (16.8%) samples were positive for class I and class II. High background was present in 22 (5.87%) samples, the results of which were confirmed by retesting or by correlation with L-PRA and L-SAB assays. Conclusion: The introduction of more sensitive approaches for the detection of anti-HLA-IgG-antibodies, such as L-XM and L-PRA assay, has allowed the identification of anti-HLA-antibodies in recipient serum which is not usually identified by CDC-XM alone. However, L-XM has some limitations; they can be overcome if we combine this assay with L-PRA.