随机有序约束下csp的流复杂度

Raghuvansh R. Saxena, Noah G. Singer, M. Sudan, Santhoshini Velusamy
{"title":"随机有序约束下csp的流复杂度","authors":"Raghuvansh R. Saxena, Noah G. Singer, M. Sudan, Santhoshini Velusamy","doi":"10.1137/1.9781611977554.ch156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We initiate a study of the streaming complexity of constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs) when the constraints arrive in a random order. We show that there exists a CSP, namely $\\textsf{Max-DICUT}$, for which random ordering makes a provable difference. Whereas a $4/9 \\approx 0.445$ approximation of $\\textsf{DICUT}$ requires $\\Omega(\\sqrt{n})$ space with adversarial ordering, we show that with random ordering of constraints there exists a $0.48$-approximation algorithm that only needs $O(\\log n)$ space. We also give new algorithms for $\\textsf{Max-DICUT}$ in variants of the adversarial ordering setting. Specifically, we give a two-pass $O(\\log n)$ space $0.48$-approximation algorithm for general graphs and a single-pass $\\tilde{O}(\\sqrt{n})$ space $0.48$-approximation algorithm for bounded degree graphs. On the negative side, we prove that CSPs where the satisfying assignments of the constraints support a one-wise independent distribution require $\\Omega(\\sqrt{n})$-space for any non-trivial approximation, even when the constraints are randomly ordered. This was previously known only for adversarially ordered constraints. Extending the results to randomly ordered constraints requires switching the hard instances from a union of random matchings to simple Erd\\\"os-Renyi random (hyper)graphs and extending tools that can perform Fourier analysis on such instances. The only CSP to have been considered previously with random ordering is $\\textsf{Max-CUT}$ where the ordering is not known to change the approximability. Specifically it is known to be as hard to approximate with random ordering as with adversarial ordering, for $o(\\sqrt{n})$ space algorithms. Our results show a richer variety of possibilities and motivate further study of CSPs with randomly ordered constraints.","PeriodicalId":11639,"journal":{"name":"Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex.","volume":"51 1","pages":"4083-4103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Streaming complexity of CSPs with randomly ordered constraints\",\"authors\":\"Raghuvansh R. Saxena, Noah G. Singer, M. Sudan, Santhoshini Velusamy\",\"doi\":\"10.1137/1.9781611977554.ch156\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We initiate a study of the streaming complexity of constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs) when the constraints arrive in a random order. We show that there exists a CSP, namely $\\\\textsf{Max-DICUT}$, for which random ordering makes a provable difference. Whereas a $4/9 \\\\approx 0.445$ approximation of $\\\\textsf{DICUT}$ requires $\\\\Omega(\\\\sqrt{n})$ space with adversarial ordering, we show that with random ordering of constraints there exists a $0.48$-approximation algorithm that only needs $O(\\\\log n)$ space. We also give new algorithms for $\\\\textsf{Max-DICUT}$ in variants of the adversarial ordering setting. Specifically, we give a two-pass $O(\\\\log n)$ space $0.48$-approximation algorithm for general graphs and a single-pass $\\\\tilde{O}(\\\\sqrt{n})$ space $0.48$-approximation algorithm for bounded degree graphs. On the negative side, we prove that CSPs where the satisfying assignments of the constraints support a one-wise independent distribution require $\\\\Omega(\\\\sqrt{n})$-space for any non-trivial approximation, even when the constraints are randomly ordered. This was previously known only for adversarially ordered constraints. Extending the results to randomly ordered constraints requires switching the hard instances from a union of random matchings to simple Erd\\\\\\\"os-Renyi random (hyper)graphs and extending tools that can perform Fourier analysis on such instances. The only CSP to have been considered previously with random ordering is $\\\\textsf{Max-CUT}$ where the ordering is not known to change the approximability. Specifically it is known to be as hard to approximate with random ordering as with adversarial ordering, for $o(\\\\sqrt{n})$ space algorithms. Our results show a richer variety of possibilities and motivate further study of CSPs with randomly ordered constraints.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11639,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex.\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"4083-4103\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611977554.ch156\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611977554.ch156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

研究了当约束以随机顺序到达时约束满足问题的流复杂度。我们证明存在一个CSP,即$\textsf{Max-DICUT}$,它的随机排序产生一个可证明的差异。虽然$\textsf{DICUT}$的$4/9 \approx 0.445$近似需要具有对抗排序的$\Omega(\sqrt{n})$空间,但我们表明,对于约束的随机排序,存在只需要$O(\log n)$空间的$0.48$ -近似算法。我们还给出了在对抗排序设置的变体中求解$\textsf{Max-DICUT}$的新算法。具体来说,我们给出了一般图的两遍$O(\log n)$空间$0.48$逼近算法和有界度图的单遍$\tilde{O}(\sqrt{n})$空间$0.48$逼近算法。在消极方面,我们证明了csp,其中令人满意的分配的约束支持单向独立分布需要$\Omega(\sqrt{n})$ -空间的任何非平凡逼近,即使约束是随机排序的。这是以前只知道对抗性排序约束。将结果扩展到随机有序约束需要将硬实例从随机匹配的并集切换到简单的Erdös-Renyi随机(超)图,并扩展可以在此类实例上执行傅里叶分析的工具。以前考虑过随机排序的唯一CSP是$\textsf{Max-CUT}$,其中排序不会改变近似性。具体来说,对于$o(\sqrt{n})$空间算法,随机排序与对抗排序一样难以近似。我们的结果显示了更丰富的可能性,并激发了随机有序约束下csp的进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Streaming complexity of CSPs with randomly ordered constraints
We initiate a study of the streaming complexity of constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs) when the constraints arrive in a random order. We show that there exists a CSP, namely $\textsf{Max-DICUT}$, for which random ordering makes a provable difference. Whereas a $4/9 \approx 0.445$ approximation of $\textsf{DICUT}$ requires $\Omega(\sqrt{n})$ space with adversarial ordering, we show that with random ordering of constraints there exists a $0.48$-approximation algorithm that only needs $O(\log n)$ space. We also give new algorithms for $\textsf{Max-DICUT}$ in variants of the adversarial ordering setting. Specifically, we give a two-pass $O(\log n)$ space $0.48$-approximation algorithm for general graphs and a single-pass $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{n})$ space $0.48$-approximation algorithm for bounded degree graphs. On the negative side, we prove that CSPs where the satisfying assignments of the constraints support a one-wise independent distribution require $\Omega(\sqrt{n})$-space for any non-trivial approximation, even when the constraints are randomly ordered. This was previously known only for adversarially ordered constraints. Extending the results to randomly ordered constraints requires switching the hard instances from a union of random matchings to simple Erd\"os-Renyi random (hyper)graphs and extending tools that can perform Fourier analysis on such instances. The only CSP to have been considered previously with random ordering is $\textsf{Max-CUT}$ where the ordering is not known to change the approximability. Specifically it is known to be as hard to approximate with random ordering as with adversarial ordering, for $o(\sqrt{n})$ space algorithms. Our results show a richer variety of possibilities and motivate further study of CSPs with randomly ordered constraints.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信